Firstly, I am not into lolis. I personally like amazonian women, like the ideal female body in my eyes is Esdeath (go figure). But unless you're a religiouscel, there is no good reason to be against it. Because the number one feminist shaming tactic is to cry out paedophile the moment men express their natural sexuality, like preferring pure women. Like a normie would literally prefer to be a betabuxxer deluxe before even considering marrying an 18-year-old. This tactic was used by feminists in the 20s, and in fact, the first bill introduced by a woman lawmaker was pushing the age of marriage to 21. This isn't what I am interpreting; this is what they say: "Supporters of the law believe that a greater age at marriage will make more time available to girls for completing their education, gaining skills, and potentially entering the workforce. This may lead to greater economic independence. Studies consistently show that women with higher education levels are more likely to use contraceptives, delay childbirth, and make informed decisions about their health and family planning."(source:https://www.orfonline.org/expert-sp...raising-the-legal-age-improve-health-outcomes) So that's why a normie would die on the hill of oh bratha your a paedophile while he gets treated like a abused puppy getting starfish sex now I am not in support of lowering it to 14 or anything like that but I am pointing out a normie would fold while someone who ismore on the based side doesnt care if toilets consider him a "paedophile"
