Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News "What incels say about Charlie Kirk - Message boards were ablaze"

Oneitiscel

Oneitiscel

Failed Jestermaxxx LDAR Extraordinaire
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Posts
7,005
Online time
3d 7h

But a good number came from two fringe communities that on the face of it would appear to have little in common: incels (i.e. sexually frustrated men who self-identify as “involuntary celibate”) and trans women. I know this because last week I spent the best part of a day trawling through their respective online echo-chambers to see what they were saying about Kirk’s murder.

One of these forums is estimated to have more than 20,000 active members. Here, incels share their personal testimonies and vent.
The news of Kirk’s death provoked a chorus of celebration: “Rest in Piss bitch,” wrote one poster.

@GmeOvr
“I feel kind of happy to hear this news and see this video,” chimed in another.

@Kanga
“Good, death to all normies,” read yet another post.

@Vector2800
Soon enough, a consensus had solidified, which was that Kirk’s murder was a good thing because he was a normal person — a “normoid” — who had a wife and children. “Not a single drop of empathy for a 6’3 MTN [mid-tier normie] neurotypical IQ mogger with wife and kids,” read one post.

@Charlie Kirk Koala
“Agreed,” noted one poster, “he was a normie sex haver.”

@aryanmikmaq
In many posts, a narrative had formed: they (the normies) hate us (the incels) and want us dead: so fuck them. For example: “Just because troons [trans-identifying people] hate him [Kirk] as well won’t make me change my opinion… He would’ve bullied me to my death. I celebrate the death of normscums.”

@Charlie Kirk Koala
Some incels had more specific reasons for celebrating Kirk’s murder, mainly to do with his support for Israel and their own raging anti-Semitism and misogyny. “He was a gynocentric constantly talking about protecting white foids [women],” thundered one poster.

@Vector2800
“He was a zionist dog,” fumed another.

@caineturbat2003
“Whatever the disagreement you and others had with him [Kirk] over his support for Israel, this kind of violence is not the solution. We can’t lose our humanity.” This post drew precisely zero responses.

@wereq

Congratulations to everyone who made it to the article :feelsLightsaber:
 
tldr: ethnoids celebrated a whitoid's death
 
now show them what leftist twitter mob says about charlie kirk
 
They cherry picked messages to push the narrative that incel radicalism is more dangerous than leftist.
There were plenty of threads on this site criticizing his assassination and how it outlined increasingly violent behavior from progressives. (who despise incels and want us dead as well)
But ofc they ignored those. Per usual.
 
this forum was ablaze :feelskek:
 
Who was the accelerationist?
 
now show them what leftist twitter mob says about charlie kirk
They won't. They're too busy trying to push "IT'S THE INCELS THAT ARE DANGEROUS" narrative. Yes, it was incels who burned down cities in 2020, right?
 
Stupid niggers they didn't post my Charlie Kirk appreciation threads
 
UnHerd tries to do something different — and harder. We are not interested in contrarianism, or opposition for its own sake; but we make it our mission to challenge herd mentality wherever we see it.
How dare you besmirch an obvious Zionist?!
 
They cherry picked messages to push the narrative that incel radicalism is more dangerous than leftist.
There were plenty of threads on this site criticizing his assassination and how it outlined increasingly violent behavior from progressives. (who despise incels and want us dead as well)
But ofc they ignored those. Per usual.
 
They cherry picked messages to push the narrative that incel radicalism is more dangerous than leftist.
There were plenty of threads on this site criticizing his assassination and how it outlined increasingly violent behavior from progressives. (who despise incels and want us dead as well)
But ofc they ignored those. Per usual.
 
They cherry picked messages to push the narrative that incel radicalism is more dangerous than leftist.
There were plenty of threads on this site criticizing his assassination and how it outlined increasingly violent behavior from progressives. (who despise incels and want us dead as well)
But ofc they ignored those. Per usual.
 
Usual retards biasing everything
 
Someone mail them this thread
 
Despite the rethoric, incel "extremism" is the most peaceful "extremism" ever.

50 people globaly only through decades? Basically nonexistent.
 
50 people globaly only through decades? Basically nonexistent.
They compared it to actual terror groups as well.

According to one well-cited academic study on incels, incel-related violence has claimed the lives of nearly 50 victims globally. This is 50 too many, but is vastly overshadowed by, for example, the menace of jihadi terrorism, which in Western Europe alone has caused the deaths of over 650 people since 1994, injuring well over 5000 more.

now show them what leftist twitter mob says about charlie kirk
An excerpt from the article regarding the trans reaction in their online communities:

Many posters responded to the news of Kirk’s murder with unbridled glee, not by saying anything but by posting GIFs. One showed a man smoking a cigar, with the caption “Rest in piss you won’t be missed”. Another showed Jeremy Clarkson sardonically mouthing the words “Oh no! Anyway.”

Most posters, though, were more forthcoming. One asked: “Anyone else suddenly feeling in a good mood?” Another responded: “I’m celebrating too. I did a little dance. I sang ‘Stayin’ Alive.’ And I had a couple of tequila shots.” Others were more measured, clarifying that what they were celebrating was not Kirk’s death, exactly, but rather, in the words of one post, “the prevention of future harmful and hateful actions/effects to society that his death represents”. This was a persistent theme in many of the hundreds of posts I came across: that Kirk constituted an existential threat to trans people and thus deserved not a shred of empathy. “I feel sorry for his family,” one poster wrote, “but this guy was a piece of shit. For years, he advocated violence against transgender people, insinuating he was going to kill us.” Others were even more scathing: “He wasn’t a person. Just a Nazi in human skin.”

A few responded to the news of Kirk’s murder by expressing alarm at how it would rebound on them. “My concern,” said one, “is that MAGA/GOP will use this as another dog whistle to eradicate us.” Another confided that while they were thrilled to hear the news of Kirk’s death, this feeling was attenuated by the “fear that the government will use this as an excuse to harm us”.

Overall, their reaction to his death is notably more sophomoric & melodramatic than the teenage edgelords on this forum.
 
Hey I made a few kirk related posts

Why wasn’t I mentioned??
 
40+ incels on the thread

Kirkpill undefeated
 
He quoted me wrong, I wrote: "Rest in Piss zionist bitch" not "Rest in Piss bitch"
 
Bro no fucking way :lul:
 




@GmeOvr


@Kanga


@Vector2800


@Charlie Kirk Koala


@aryanmikmaq


@Charlie Kirk Koala


@Vector2800


@caineturbat2003


@wereq

Congratulations to everyone who made it to the article :feelsLightsaber:
i wasn’t mentioned. was i not good enough :(
 
dnrd not quoted
 
He's a normie fag with a wife and kids, why would I care about him? Ntm unintelligent Chads will piss their pants if they have to have a kid with just any hole they meet.
 
They cherry picked messages to push the narrative that incel radicalism is more dangerous than leftist.
There were plenty of threads on this site criticizing his assassination and how it outlined increasingly violent behavior from progressives. (who despise incels and want us dead as well)
But ofc they ignored those. Per usual.
 
Fuark someone already did it. Well done.
 
Is he talking about me lol. That one accelerationist?
 
I celebrated his death at first but then I realized he likely got killed for starting to question these narratives that he was known for pushing.
 
So strange how they just cherry pick certain posts like that. Tons of posts weren't like that.


I said:

"31 and violently shot in front of his young children. That's pretty messed up.

It's amazing to me that anyone tries to find a way to downplay that."

but I doubt that kind of post would have been included in their article!
 
Last edited:
They cherry picked messages to push the narrative that incel radicalism is more dangerous than leftist.
There were plenty of threads on this site criticizing his assassination and how it outlined increasingly violent behavior from progressives. (who despise incels and want us dead as well)
But ofc they ignored those. Per usual.
Yea, they cherry picked a part of my thread, specifically that "he was a zionist dog" quote to paint me as some bloodthirsty maniac, but if you would look closely my point was that of pure apathy. I suspect the article was written by someone with a big nose.
 
wish he referenced my meme
 
this forum was ablaze :feelskek:
It really was though. The entire Lounge was FILLED WITH NOTHING BUT THREADS related to him getting shot that day.
 
We are all Charlie, he didn't deserve that
 




@GmeOvr


@Kanga


@Vector2800


@Charlie Kirk Koala


@aryanmikmaq


@Charlie Kirk Koala


@Vector2800


@caineturbat2003


@wereq

Congratulations to everyone who made it to the article :feelsLightsaber:
Lmfao
 

Similar threads

VλREN
Replies
20
Views
787
NIGGA BANBAN
NIGGA BANBAN
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
10
Views
837
nihilum
nihilum
Last2025cel
Replies
49
Views
2K
nihilum
nihilum
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
52
Views
2K
Bulbasaur
Bulbasaur

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top