Let us call the entire dating world, which we see as the sum of sexual relationship experiences that occurs within space-time continuum a muddle. The entire incelospheric/manospheric/looksmaxx discourse revolves around this muddle.
It appears that nobody has been able to reach a consensus regarding that muddle. Perhaps the consensus is that there is no consensus. I would like to visualize this muddle as an invisible, huge, blob like entity.
Most of the individuals who post on incelospheric/manospheric/looksmaxx platforms make models to simplify this muddle for convenience.
Individuals risk accuracy if their models are too simple. It can cause emotional and hallucinogenic effects if these models include "guilty parties" as in Just be Xs, X-pills and X is the law's. If the model attempts to account for everything(every data point) about the muddle, then the model becomes identical to muddle. In other words, the model is seen as "impractical" or "incomprehensible". Some causes of hasty "modelling":
1- Socio-cultural-economic factors
2- Cognitive bias( Human brains' heuristic processes to make things simpler, tendency to take shortcuts)
3- Bandwagon effect
4- Site rules, pressure from other individuals, group conformity
5- Personal motives
6- Subjective nature of human experience
Observe how people in those platforms handle "artefacts"(Instagram photos, TikTok videos, infographs, statistical charts, tweets, etc.) to "verify" their models. Nietzsche said "We are all greater artists than we realize". Just like this, a person can create an universe that JBX is true. Socrates said "I know that I know nothing". All those "artefacts" fall short of explaining deep muddle. At this point, all we need to do is sit down and observe our thoughts and others' carefully and be conscious in my opinion. Life is full of mystery.
It appears that nobody has been able to reach a consensus regarding that muddle. Perhaps the consensus is that there is no consensus. I would like to visualize this muddle as an invisible, huge, blob like entity.
Most of the individuals who post on incelospheric/manospheric/looksmaxx platforms make models to simplify this muddle for convenience.
Individuals risk accuracy if their models are too simple. It can cause emotional and hallucinogenic effects if these models include "guilty parties" as in Just be Xs, X-pills and X is the law's. If the model attempts to account for everything(every data point) about the muddle, then the model becomes identical to muddle. In other words, the model is seen as "impractical" or "incomprehensible". Some causes of hasty "modelling":
1- Socio-cultural-economic factors
2- Cognitive bias( Human brains' heuristic processes to make things simpler, tendency to take shortcuts)
3- Bandwagon effect
4- Site rules, pressure from other individuals, group conformity
5- Personal motives
6- Subjective nature of human experience
Observe how people in those platforms handle "artefacts"(Instagram photos, TikTok videos, infographs, statistical charts, tweets, etc.) to "verify" their models. Nietzsche said "We are all greater artists than we realize". Just like this, a person can create an universe that JBX is true. Socrates said "I know that I know nothing". All those "artefacts" fall short of explaining deep muddle. At this point, all we need to do is sit down and observe our thoughts and others' carefully and be conscious in my opinion. Life is full of mystery.
