C
CopingGymcel
poop
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Posts
- 7,502
This is basically what he is trying to say: Most of the members on this forum aren't truecels and fall in the 4/10 range (that could just mean that we're infected by volcels or he could simply be wrong, but take it as you like). He clearly stated that some are in fact truecels, about 10% he said. Now, that means he is saying that 10% of this forum couldn't get laid no matter what, which means he is not denying that lookism exists.
He is simply stating that 4/10 is not ugly enough on its own to merit someone being an incel and that most 4/10s live normal lives and have relationships and that if someone is 4/10 and incel, that person lacks the NT part, which is very important (it's stupid to deny this).
For people who didn't understand what he was trying to get across, this is basically it.
It's very stupid to deny behavior and only focus on F A C E, as both are very important in most cases.
He is simply stating that 4/10 is not ugly enough on its own to merit someone being an incel and that most 4/10s live normal lives and have relationships and that if someone is 4/10 and incel, that person lacks the NT part, which is very important (it's stupid to deny this).
For people who didn't understand what he was trying to get across, this is basically it.
It's very stupid to deny behavior and only focus on F A C E, as both are very important in most cases.