News What do y'all think of incel studies?

[ChindianEugenicist]

One is the loneliest number: Involuntary celibacy (incel), mental health, and loneliness - PMC

Incels—a ragtag collection of young males who have rallied around their shared experience of romantic rejection—have slowly emerged as an online group of interest to researchers, no doubt as a result of several high-profile attacks. Much of this ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

The Angry Echo Chamber: A Study of Extremist and Emotional Language Changes in Incel Communities Over Time - PMC

Involuntary celibates, or incels, are part of a growing online subculture. Incels are men who are unable to engage in a sexual relationship with a woman and who experience significant distress and anger as a result. In recent years, high-profile ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-03/ti727_disengagement_from_online_misogynistic_incel_communities.pdf

Involuntary celibates (“incels”) refers to a group consisting mostly of heterosexual men that exists predominantly in online spaces. These men are united by a belief that they are victimized by a postfeminist society, leading to an inability to engage in sexual intimacy with women. Recent acts of mass violence have been linked to self-identified incels, leading to an increased need for awareness of incel worldviews, argot, and demographics among psychiatrists. Limited research exists to describe this heterogenous group, with existing data suggesting higher rates of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation within the demographic. This column reviews the incel worldview, existing literature, how to identify an individual with incel beliefs based on vocabulary and internet usage, and treatment modalities.

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

A huge flaw with these studies is that they study incels the same way a zoologist studies lions. An outsider observing the in-group. No self-admitted incels or former incels are ever included in organizing the study or being interviewed. That said, I can't say a lot of their findings are flat-out wrong. They're just bluepill.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

Academia is corrupted. The more I study sciences. the more I come to the conclusion that they're currently based upon ideological dogmas. Thus they're worthless in form they got in our times. The studies on inkwelldom are pure hypergamist propaganda.

 

[tired as fuck]

Academia is corrupted. The more I study sciences. the more I come to the conclusion that they're currently based upon ideological dogmas. Thus they're worthless in form they got in our times. The studies on inkwelldom are pure hypergamist propaganda.

Elaborate a bit pls I'm interested

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

Elaborate a bit pls I'm interested

There are dogmatic presuppositions applied in most of fields, which from necessity lead to expected results instead of flowing freely to what is true. In medieval and later, one was expected to always found knowledge upon the dogma of God's existence; therefore every scholastic treatise had been confirming his existence, greatness, goodness etc, leading to confirm what it rose up from. Current sciences are build upon dogmas of equality between humans and foids, no psychic difference between these two, and some more. For example, Fisher's biology is rejected because he proved that female choice is always dysgenic and destructive; what leads to the fact that rape is an eugenic act. There cannot even exist a study that reveals foids' subhumanity, for it will be rejected as psuedoscientific simply for rejecting this ideological foundation.

Empirical sciences has to remain pure from such filth. And that's why science is up to us, blackpillists, having prime empirical knowledge of true femoid behavior around chad; knowledge that most don't have, since chads are not many and thus are most likely to be seen artificially. Meeks is prime example of this.

 

[tired as fuck]

There are dogmatic presuppositions applied in most of fields, which from necessity lead to expected results instead of flowing freely to what is true. In medieval and later, one was expected to always found knowledge upon the dogma of God's existence; therefore every scholastic treatise had been confirming his existence, greatness, goodness etc, leading to confirm what it rose up from. Current sciences are build upon dogmas of equality between humans and foids, no psychic difference between these two, and some more. For example, Fisher's biology is rejected because he proved that female choice is always dysgenic and destructive; what leads to the fact that rape is an eugenic act. There cannot even exist a study that reveals foids' subhumanity, for it will be rejected as psuedoscientific simply for rejecting this ideological foundation.

Empirical sciences has to remain pure from such filth. And that's why science is up to us, blackpillists, having prime empirical knowledge of true femoid behavior around chad; knowledge that most don't have, since chads are not many and thus are most likely to be seen artificially. Meeks is prime example of this.

Every study bearing a conclusion that contradicts the ideological dogmas is either never published or published with the researchers explicitly stating "we don't know why it is like this, we expected this other thing, there were either some errors or we need to come up with a way of how to spin this around and interpret it in our favor". This is why I didn't decide to go into humanities but into maths: too much ideological bullshitting. Academia needs to be gutted, it is rotten throughout. Breeding ground for blue haired 41 percenters. Tired.

The only problem with what I've read is that implicitly, you state there is a way to conduct studies or even just live without adhering to any axiom, which is false, at some point there always are axioms placed.

 

[Pancakecel]

Y'all

 

[DepravedAndDeprived]

I always read them and check if a post of mine got screencapped

 

[DepravedAndDeprived]

Also:

Y'all

 

[Steiner_Atlas]

They frame us like a group of space aliens, or some colony of bacteria instead of humans with legitimate complaints.

This forum is just a zoo for normies and foids to gawk at.

 

[GreerTech Creations]

I majored in Incel Studies at Starfleet Academy

 

[GreerTech Creations]

Academia is corrupted. The more I study sciences. the more I come to the conclusion that they're currently based upon ideological dogmas. Thus they're worthless in form they got in our times. The studies on inkwelldom are pure hypergamist propaganda.

There are dogmatic presuppositions applied in most of fields, which from necessity lead to expected results instead of flowing freely to what is true. In medieval and later, one was expected to always found knowledge upon the dogma of God's existence; therefore every scholastic treatise had been confirming his existence, greatness, goodness etc, leading to confirm what it rose up from. Current sciences are build upon dogmas of equality between humans and foids, no psychic difference between these two, and some more. For example, Fisher's biology is rejected because he proved that female choice is always dysgenic and destructive; what leads to the fact that rape is an eugenic act. There cannot even exist a study that reveals foids' subhumanity, for it will be rejected as psuedoscientific simply for rejecting this ideological foundation.

Empirical sciences has to remain pure from such filth. And that's why science is up to us, blackpillists, having prime empirical knowledge of true femoid behavior around chad; knowledge that most don't have, since chads are not many and thus are most likely to be seen artificially. Meeks is prime example of this.

Absolute TRVTHNUKE

 

[XtremeMax]

i dont read them i have better things to do like play video games, post here and drink alcohol

 

[entombed]

It’s Pseudo intellectual garbage

 

[itsovER99]

bs

 

[Grodd]

I don't care

 

[Rampagecel]

They act like these studies will be used for anything. Nothing really happens other than shitty Netflix docuseries.

 

[PhineasSpear]

Pile of lies created to serve their gynocentric ideology.

 

[Mr Producer]

methodology is always bullshit, and they almost never account for hawthorne effect

 

[Mr Producer]

Academia is corrupted. The more I study sciences. the more I come to the conclusion that they're currently based upon ideological dogmas. Thus they're worthless in form they got in our times. The studies on inkwelldom are pure hypergamist propaganda.

There are dogmatic presuppositions applied in most of fields, which from necessity lead to expected results instead of flowing freely to what is true. In medieval and later, one was expected to always found knowledge upon the dogma of God's existence; therefore every scholastic treatise had been confirming his existence, greatness, goodness etc, leading to confirm what it rose up from. Current sciences are build upon dogmas of equality between humans and foids, no psychic difference between these two, and some more. For example, Fisher's biology is rejected because he proved that female choice is always dysgenic and destructive; what leads to the fact that rape is an eugenic act. There cannot even exist a study that reveals foids' subhumanity, for it will be rejected as psuedoscientific simply for rejecting this ideological foundation.

Empirical sciences has to remain pure from such filth. And that's why science is up to us, blackpillists, having prime empirical knowledge of true femoid behavior around chad; knowledge that most don't have, since chads are not many and thus are most likely to be seen artificially. Meeks is prime example of this.

well said

 

[lonely01]

One is the loneliest number: Involuntary celibacy (incel), mental health, and loneliness - PMC

Incels—a ragtag collection of young males who have rallied around their shared experience of romantic rejection—have slowly emerged as an online group of interest to researchers, no doubt as a result of several high-profile attacks. Much of this ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

The Angry Echo Chamber: A Study of Extremist and Emotional Language Changes in Incel Communities Over Time - PMC

Involuntary celibates, or incels, are part of a growing online subculture. Incels are men who are unable to engage in a sexual relationship with a woman and who experience significant distress and anger as a result. In recent years, high-profile ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-03/ti727_disengagement_from_online_misogynistic_incel_communities.pdf

A huge flaw with these studies is that they study incels the same way a zoologist studies lions. An outsider observing the in-group. No self-admitted incels or former incels are ever included in organizing the study or being interviewed. That said, I can't say a lot of their findings are flat-out wrong. They're just bluepill.

Agreed. But then again researchers try to engage with us and they are just rejected and ignored. I asked on this forum if I should participate in research happening at my university and everyone was against it. I honestly don't see any harm in it, especially if they discuss the results of the poor mental health state that 99.99% of user on this forum are in, and where that comes from. See things from our point of view.