Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious What criteria would you use to ban OnlyFans and the likes but not porn in general?

crew2

crew2

Captain
★★★★
Joined
Dec 4, 2017
Posts
1,894
Not that this is going to happen any time soon but as we know OnlyFans is degenerate garbage and it being banned as the digital whoring platform that it is would be great. It is one thing checking out foids in porn which most of us do but every average and ugly foid being able to go on OnlyFans to whore themselves out rather than settling for their looksmatch on a scale by the millions is even worse. It essentially means they will adopt the I don't need no man attitude and support themselves in the most disgusting ways for their whole youth and beyond. And for every whore on OnlyFans there is a lonely man out there who could've made a great boyfriend for her...probably posting here.

The problem is what criteria would you use to ban one and not the other is you could? Like if this was up for debate in congress and you personally had to present arguments about why it should be banned what would you out forward? Just something I think about now and again so was curious. Mine are below.

Legal:-

  • It is essentially digital prostitution and hence shouldn't be allowed in countries where real life prostitution is illegal
  • Underage kids can go on and directly interact with the whores and ask them to do all kinds of disgusting things without the whore even knowing that she is interacting with a child. This interaction is also instantaneous and unfiltered meaning the whore could do whatever she wants in front of the kid and he wouldn't be able to un-see it whereas porn is just a recorded media with no real time interaction possible
Societal:-

  • It is encouraging women to be promiscuous and good men don't want to settle down with promiscuous women
  • Rather than finding a mate and starting a family whores and selling their bodies on the internet for decades
 
cope just ban everything so there's no more excuses like "oh you're inkler? just play with your dick in a dark room. problem solved"
 
cope just ban everything so there's no more excuses like "oh you're inkler? just play with your dick in a dark room. problem solved"
Low IQ. I asked what your reasons were for banning this stuff if you had the chance to present arguments.
 
Low IQ. I asked what your reasons were for banning this stuff if you had the chance to present arguments.

Legal:-

  • It is essentially digital prostitution and hence shouldn't be allowed in countries where real life prostitution is illegal
  • Underage kids can go on and directly interact with the whores and ask them to do all kinds of disgusting things without the whore even knowing that she is interacting with a child. This interaction is also instantaneous and unfiltered meaning the whore could do whatever she wants in front of the kid and he wouldn't be able to un-see it whereas porn is just a recorded media with no real time interaction possible
Societal:-

  • It is encouraging women to be promiscuous and good men don't want to settle down with promiscuous women
  • Rather than finding a mate and starting a family whores and selling their bodies on the internet for decades
cope, trading nudes is allowed provided they are not underage, even degenerate art shows with nudity and large audiences are allowed
cope, underage kids can and already are watching porn since extremely low ages and no one cares
cope, no one cares about what men want, even in "based countries" like poland, russia, ukraine
cope, no world government practices that type of restraining of women's personal freedoms, not even "based countries"
 
cope, trading nudes is allowed provided they are not underage, even degenerate art shows with nudity and large audiences are allowed
cope, underage kids can and already are watching porn since extremely low ages and no one cares
cope, no one cares about what men want, even in "based countries" like poland, russia, ukraine
cope, no world government practices that type of restraining of women's personal freedoms, not even "based countries"

Sounds like projection coping to me. Again I asked what reasons YOU would give to ban these things. Spit it out.
 
@I want to believe

29362.jpg



faggot-above-me.jpg
 
Sounds like projection coping to me. Again I asked what reasons YOU would give to ban these things. Spit it out.
what is your major malfunction, maggot? you think you can reason with today's government and tell them magic words that will reverse their policy a full 180 degrees?

the "reason" for banning this stuff is that it doesn't belong in a functioning, fertile, future-oriented society, because no one is supposed to have time to sit around playing with their dicks or taking photo selfies of their cunts, they're too busy working, interacting with others and building a family.
the idea that you're supposed to timidly debate why some forms of pornography need to be restrained a little is a sign that you're trying to relate with a total shit government instead of replacing it with one that isn't total shit.
 
Haram nudity is.

More reasons, you need?.
 
what is your major malfunction, maggot? you think you can reason with today's government and tell them magic words that will reverse their policy a full 180 degrees?
It sounds like you've got the malfunction, dirtbag. I said in the opening sentence "Not that this is going to happen anytime soon" i.e. I'm not expecting it to happen because the usual braindead reply on here is "cope" rather than actual discussion unless you include a disclaimer like that. I was asking what reasons YOU would put forward to get these things banned if in theory you had the chance. This is why it's best not to just either quote-spam everybody's posts twenty four seven or post a few word answers to increase your post count here and instead read what's written.

the "reason" for banning this stuff is that it doesn't belong in a functioning, fertile, future-oriented society, because no one is supposed to have time to sit around playing with their dicks or taking photo selfies of their cunts, they're too busy working, interacting with others and building a family.
the idea that you're supposed to timidly debate why some forms of pornography need to be restrained a little is a sign that you're trying to relate with a total shit government instead of replacing it with one that isn't total shit.
True.
Haram nudity is.

More reasons, you need?.
That's good enough to me. But I suspect most of the stuff I do is probably haram as well. Is playing games and watching YouTube videos haram?
 
Last edited:
@I want to believe

29362.jpg



faggot-above-me.jpg
That's stupid, btw.
And why do you think OnlyFans is a problem in itself?
Do you think if there weren't cucks ready to pay foids for literally nothing, there would be OnlyFans or shit like that? As for me, I doubt it.
 
That's stupid, btw.
And why do you think OnlyFans is a problem in itself?
Do you think if there weren't cucks ready to pay foids for literally nothing, there would be OnlyFans or shit like that? As for me, I doubt it.
Yep well so is blindly quoting a post without giving your own thoughts or reading the opening post.

OnlyFans is a problem because it encourages degeneracy from foids, allows foids to leech thousands from men every day by taking money from them in exchange for simply showing their bodies and it also stops women from settling down with a partner for decades because they can essentially show their pussy on the internet rather than building a family with a man which leaves a man lonely every time it happens. For every whore on there there is a lonely suicidal man who could be a potential boyfriend for her. The real question is why would you NOT think that OnlyFans is a problem?

Cucks existing is one thing, facilitating cucking and simping on a massive scale and monetising it is another.
 
A sin tax on pornography could be useful since it ultimately is harmful, even if in a minor way. It doesn't matter whether it's placed on producers or consumers since I imagine consumers will pay for it either way. This could be used to discourage people from OF subscriptions and squeeze money out of simps in exchange for reducing taxes in other places. However, a significant amount of the content on OF is not pornographic in nature. Sure we can reduce the demand for actual whores, but how can we possibly make a foid just saying the name of a guy, which people pay for btw, illegal within our current western parameters?

The problem is ultimately a cultural one and many men have no qualms about pursuing such avenues of satisfaction. Incels would have to group together and form societies where hypergamy and female worship is rebuked at every step. It's totally legal to have an OF account in most of the developing world but yet foids there are too scared to. That's the real game changer.
 
A sin tax on pornography could be useful since it ultimately is harmful, even if in a minor way. It doesn't matter whether it's placed on producers or consumers since I imagine consumers will pay for it either way. This could be used to discourage people from OF subscriptions and squeeze money out of simps in exchange for reducing taxes in other places. However, a significant amount of the content on OF is not pornographic in nature. Sure we can reduce the demand for actual whores, but how can we possibly make a foid just saying the name of a guy, which people pay for btw, illegal within our current western parameters?

The problem is ultimately a cultural one and many men have no qualms about pursuing such avenues of satisfaction. Incels would have to group together and form societies where hypergamy and female worship is rebuked at every step. It's totally legal to have an OF account in most of the developing world but yet foids there are too scared to. That's the real game changer.
Good point blue. The western parameters you mentioned are the issue. While we just KNOW that OnlyFans is wrong the same way we know that having sex with out sisters and with animals is wrong it is putting that across in a tangible way by providing our own parameters as to why it should be banned and the likes of, say porn, shouldn't that is the difficulty. Unless we ban all nudity Islamic style.

And I think this highlights the problem. When we were less technologically developed we had a near perfect system but now people rely on garbage like this to the extent that no Government could get rid of it at the risk of losing muh votes.

Degenerate culture and slut acceptance has been a game changer. When I was in school and college if a girl slept with guys she was slut shamed by fellow girls and men. Crazy how much things have changed.
 
Degenerate culture and slut acceptance has been a game changer. When I was in school and college if a girl slept with guys she was slut shamed by fellow girls and men. Crazy how much things have changed.
Yea, I think that's why spreading the blackpill is useful even thought it might get watered down in some aspects. I like seeing how often people are called out for simping, well at least online anyways.
 

Similar threads

Fancy Alcoholic
Replies
11
Views
242
Fancy Alcoholic
Fancy Alcoholic
Q
Replies
89
Views
2K
Qwertyuiop99
Q
I
Replies
22
Views
723
despisedpaul
despisedpaul
Redbeard7
Replies
33
Views
838
UglyDumbass
U

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top