R
I’ve never understood how this bizarre phenomenon has emerged and become such a huge issue over the last ten years. Historically, dealing with women was just part of life, something men had to put up with. But this scene now, with so many lonely, disaffected men, is unprecedented and shows how civilization is crumbling.
I looked up the origins of incels and it turns out this has been a long-standing problem. Men unable to find a wife because of social class, war, poverty, or shyness. Yet most men in monogamous societies still managed to marry and pass on their genes.
Now people, (mostly women and simp followers), use the term as an insult against anyone questioning foids' behavior, even if the criticism comes from married men or men in relationships. They see the roughly 20 percent of young men who have never had an intimate relationship not as a social problem but as a 'male loser epidemic.' That is insane.
Twenty percent of men being denied basic needs like stable jobs, a home, a family, is not a small echo chamber. It is a massive problem. No ruling elite wants their disgruntled male youth to grow large enough to threaten their power, yet everyone pretends male loneliness does not exist.
What is worse is how young women respond. Instead of understanding the responsibilities each sex has in relationships and supporting each other, they turn against men, claiming incels are expecting too much, that men and society owe them nothing, especially if it interferes with their 'fun' journey.
This has pushed both sexes further apart, including politically. Young single women lean heavily Democrat while men lean increasingly conservative. This is visible in countries like South Korea and the United States, though the gap is worse in some places.
So my question remains: when and how did modern inceldom crystallize and get worse? I don’t remember it being an issue in the 2000s. Back then dealing with women was whatever. Divorce and single-parent households were becoming common, but it was still easy to meet women at a bar or in high school. So what is really behind this problem today?
I looked up the origins of incels and it turns out this has been a long-standing problem. Men unable to find a wife because of social class, war, poverty, or shyness. Yet most men in monogamous societies still managed to marry and pass on their genes.
Now people, (mostly women and simp followers), use the term as an insult against anyone questioning foids' behavior, even if the criticism comes from married men or men in relationships. They see the roughly 20 percent of young men who have never had an intimate relationship not as a social problem but as a 'male loser epidemic.' That is insane.
Twenty percent of men being denied basic needs like stable jobs, a home, a family, is not a small echo chamber. It is a massive problem. No ruling elite wants their disgruntled male youth to grow large enough to threaten their power, yet everyone pretends male loneliness does not exist.
What is worse is how young women respond. Instead of understanding the responsibilities each sex has in relationships and supporting each other, they turn against men, claiming incels are expecting too much, that men and society owe them nothing, especially if it interferes with their 'fun' journey.
This has pushed both sexes further apart, including politically. Young single women lean heavily Democrat while men lean increasingly conservative. This is visible in countries like South Korea and the United States, though the gap is worse in some places.
So my question remains: when and how did modern inceldom crystallize and get worse? I don’t remember it being an issue in the 2000s. Back then dealing with women was whatever. Divorce and single-parent households were becoming common, but it was still easy to meet women at a bar or in high school. So what is really behind this problem today?
