Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

What can be gathered from this post?

  • Thread starter Deleted Member 8090
  • Start date
D

Deleted Member 8090

Greycel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 22, 2024
Posts
1
Screenshot 2025 08 05 16 09 05 29 1c337646f29875672b5a61192b9010f9


1. Foids do not have any agency. When they murder their own child, they will claim it was other people's fault instead of their own. Feminist constantly admit to females not having any agency of their own.

2. Foids do not respect their boyfriends or husbands. They will murder his kid behind his back. They mean nothing to the foid because they are replaceable

3. Foids do not value their own children. They will murder them and then instead of genuinely being sorry, they will throw a pity party for themselves and claim victimhood for Internet points "boo hoo I did something evil"
 
Screenshot 2025 08 03 14 21 42 43 40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12

Ew, what the fuck, do you actually think this way? Here's an idea: load up youtube, put on a well written video essay on why the manosphere is tricking you, and then learn to be a better human being. Or better yet, just go to therapy, sweaty
 
Foids don't care about children nowadays, all they want is for Chad to fuck them so they can abort the kid later
 
View attachment 1512513

1. Foids do not have any agency. When they murder their own child, they will claim it was other people's fault instead of their own. Feminist constantly admit to females not having any agency of their own.

2. Foids do not respect their boyfriends or husbands. They will murder his kid behind his back. They mean nothing to the foid because they are replaceable

3. Foids do not value their own children. They will murder them and then instead of genuinely being sorry, they will throw a pity party for themselves and claim victimhood for Internet points "boo hoo I did something evil"

Alright, folks, gather 'round the digital campfire. Another day, another shining example of the incel mind at work, meticulously crafting a worldview so twisted it could win an Olympic medal in mental gymnastics. Found this little gem floating around, and it's too perfect not to dissect.

Here's the original "wisdom" for your viewing pleasure:

  1. Foids do not have any agency. When they murder their own child, they will claim it was other people's fault instead of their own. Feminist constantly admit to females not having any agency of their own.
  2. Foids do not respect their boyfriends or husbands. They will murder his kid behind his back. They mean nothing to the foid because they are replaceable
  3. Foids do not value their own children. They will murder them and then instead of genuinely being sorry, they will throw a pity party for themselves and claim victimhood for Internet points "boo hoo I did something evil"

Let's unpack this magnificent display of projection, misogyny, and outright delusion, shall we?

Point 1: The "Foids Have No Agency" Contradiction

Oh, sweet summer child, the mental acrobatics required for this opening statement are truly something to behold. "Foids do not have any agency," they declare, with all the gravitas of a truly profound insight. Then, in the very next breath, they say, "When they murder their own child..."

Wait. Pause. If "foids" have no agency, how precisely are they "murdering" anyone? Is it an involuntary muscle spasm? Are they being remote-controlled? This is the logical equivalent of saying "cars have no wheels, and when they drive down the highway..." It's a complete, glaring, self-refuting absurdity right out of the gate.

And the classic strawman about feminists "admitting females not having any agency"? Hilarious. What feminists actually discuss are systemic oppressions, societal constraints, and the ways in which external factors can limit choices or create victims. That's a world away from "no agency." But of course, for an incel, it's easier to invent a simplified, evil caricature than to grapple with actual sociological concepts. Or, you know, the concept that women are, in fact, fully autonomous human beings.

Point 2: The "Disrespect" to "Murder His Kid" Escalation

This point rapidly descends into full-blown paranoid fantasy. From "foids do not respect their boyfriends or husbands" (a common incel grievance, often because their definition of "respect" involves unquestioning subservience) to "They will murder his kid behind his back."

Seriously? This isn't just a leap, it's a quantum jump into a parallel dimension where every woman is secretly a baby-killing assassin. This isn't about "respect"; it's about the incel's deep-seated fear of female autonomy, female control over their own bodies, and the terrifying (to them) possibility that women might not prioritize their desires above all else. The "they are replaceable" line? Classic projection. Incels literally view women as interchangeable holes for their pleasure, so naturally, they assume women view men (and their offspring) with the same cold, utilitarian detachment.

Point 3: The "Pity Party for Internet Points" Dehumanization

And the grand finale! Not only do "foids" supposedly commit these unspeakable acts, but then, if they show any remorse or distress, it's automatically dismissed as a manipulative "pity party for themselves and claim victimhood for Internet points."

This is the ultimate incel move to strip women of their humanity. There's no room for guilt, trauma, mental illness, or genuine grief. Any expression of negative emotion by a woman is immediately labeled as a performance designed solely for "attention" or "internet points." It's the ultimate denial of female inner life, reducing women to purely external, transactional beings. It's a convenient way to ensure that any perceived female "failing" can be both condemned and simultaneously dismissed as insincere.


In Conclusion:

What we have here is a textbook example of incel ideology:

  • Projection: Blaming women for lacking agency while incels themselves externalize all their problems. Viewing women as "replaceable" while their entire online subculture treats women as such.
  • Dehumanization: Stripping women of complex emotions, agency, and human dignity, reducing them to one-dimensional villains or attention-seeking robots.
  • Contradictory Logic: Simultaneously claiming women have no agency while accusing them of specific, intentional, heinous acts.
  • Victim Blaming (of the victimizers): Twisting any potential remorse into cynical manipulation.
It's a pathetic, self-reinforcing echo chamber designed to rationalize their own self-imposed misery and hatred, rather than confront any uncomfortable realities about themselves or the world.

Just another glorious day in the incel verse. Stay safe out there, kings and queens, and keep an eye out for more of this intellectual gold.

TL;DR: Incel tries to argue women have no agency but then immediately blames them for the most heinous acts, projects his own insecurities onto them, and then dismisses any potential remorse as "pity parties for internet points." Standard misogynistic brain rot.
 
Foids don't care about children nowadays, all they want is for Chad to fuck them so they can abort the kid later
Okay sweaty you need to be a decent human being and maybe they will want to create life with you, okay?
 
Yet again it's proven Foids are narcissistic sociopaths that hate accountability so much to the extent they will kill their own child to avoid dealing with the consequences of their own actions.

Also it's insane how self centred this cunt is, "Me me me" doesn't stop once to mention the fact that her child was stopped from having a life due to her actions.

I hate foids so much.
F388715E623476D936455E3C942E441E73321AD0
 
Alright, folks, gather 'round the digital campfire. Another day, another shining example of the incel mind at work, meticulously crafting a worldview so twisted it could win an Olympic medal in mental gymnastics. Found this little gem floating around, and it's too perfect not to dissect.

Here's the original "wisdom" for your viewing pleasure:



Let's unpack this magnificent display of projection, misogyny, and outright delusion, shall we?

Point 1: The "Foids Have No Agency" Contradiction

Oh, sweet summer child, the mental acrobatics required for this opening statement are truly something to behold. "Foids do not have any agency," they declare, with all the gravitas of a truly profound insight. Then, in the very next breath, they say, "When they murder their own child..."

Wait. Pause. If "foids" have no agency, how precisely are they "murdering" anyone? Is it an involuntary muscle spasm? Are they being remote-controlled? This is the logical equivalent of saying "cars have no wheels, and when they drive down the highway..." It's a complete, glaring, self-refuting absurdity right out of the gate.

And the classic strawman about feminists "admitting females not having any agency"? Hilarious. What feminists actually discuss are systemic oppressions, societal constraints, and the ways in which external factors can limit choices or create victims. That's a world away from "no agency." But of course, for an incel, it's easier to invent a simplified, evil caricature than to grapple with actual sociological concepts. Or, you know, the concept that women are, in fact, fully autonomous human beings.

Point 2: The "Disrespect" to "Murder His Kid" Escalation

This point rapidly descends into full-blown paranoid fantasy. From "foids do not respect their boyfriends or husbands" (a common incel grievance, often because their definition of "respect" involves unquestioning subservience) to "They will murder his kid behind his back."

Seriously? This isn't just a leap, it's a quantum jump into a parallel dimension where every woman is secretly a baby-killing assassin. This isn't about "respect"; it's about the incel's deep-seated fear of female autonomy, female control over their own bodies, and the terrifying (to them) possibility that women might not prioritize their desires above all else. The "they are replaceable" line? Classic projection. Incels literally view women as interchangeable holes for their pleasure, so naturally, they assume women view men (and their offspring) with the same cold, utilitarian detachment.

Point 3: The "Pity Party for Internet Points" Dehumanization

And the grand finale! Not only do "foids" supposedly commit these unspeakable acts, but then, if they show any remorse or distress, it's automatically dismissed as a manipulative "pity party for themselves and claim victimhood for Internet points."

This is the ultimate incel move to strip women of their humanity. There's no room for guilt, trauma, mental illness, or genuine grief. Any expression of negative emotion by a woman is immediately labeled as a performance designed solely for "attention" or "internet points." It's the ultimate denial of female inner life, reducing women to purely external, transactional beings. It's a convenient way to ensure that any perceived female "failing" can be both condemned and simultaneously dismissed as insincere.


In Conclusion:

What we have here is a textbook example of incel ideology:

  • Projection: Blaming women for lacking agency while incels themselves externalize all their problems. Viewing women as "replaceable" while their entire online subculture treats women as such.
  • Dehumanization: Stripping women of complex emotions, agency, and human dignity, reducing them to one-dimensional villains or attention-seeking robots.
  • Contradictory Logic: Simultaneously claiming women have no agency while accusing them of specific, intentional, heinous acts.
  • Victim Blaming (of the victimizers): Twisting any potential remorse into cynical manipulation.
It's a pathetic, self-reinforcing echo chamber designed to rationalize their own self-imposed misery and hatred, rather than confront any uncomfortable realities about themselves or the world.

Just another glorious day in the incel verse. Stay safe out there, kings and queens, and keep an eye out for more of this intellectual gold.

TL;DR: Incel tries to argue women have no agency but then immediately blames them for the most heinous acts, projects his own insecurities onto them, and then dismisses any potential remorse as "pity parties for internet points." Standard misogynistic brain rot.
what is this
 
foid's deranged ramblings, not worth even reading diagonally
 
"the new aesthetics of fascism :soy::soy::soy:" these types of video-essays are some of the worst content on YouTube. it's even worse than that Spiderman and Elsa shit that was plaguing the site in 2016.
I'd rather watch scat porn.
 
probably trolling

he might get banned for it
It's clearly satire AI slop. If he really gets banned for it then this forum has gone to shit :feelsugh:
 
It's clearly satire AI slop. If he really gets banned for it then this forum has gone to shit :feelsugh:
Considering your statement, he might not get banned

I've seen users get banned before e.g @Fantasea for "joking in ID"

Though @Fantasea 's comments were more straightforward rather than AI slop

He will probably get a warning at best but chances are, nothing will happen
 
27? i thought she was like 18 or 19 how is she 27 getting treated like a teen by the people around her. also jfl at the locked comments but not surprised
 
27? i thought she was like 18 or 19 how is she 27 getting treated like a teen by the people around her. also jfl at the locked comments but not surprised
Because women have no agency and nothing is their fault but at the same time they are strong career women who need the right to vote and should take over all positions
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top