Title. Every post I see from the f@g is basically, "Well ackshuually, incel is a state of being, NOT an ideology." STFU!!! WRONG!!! There's a difference between being involuntary celibate and being an incel. An incel is not an involuntary celibate person. Example: Suppose someone can't get laid in all their years of being. This person, however, is completely deluded into thinking he has a chance (subconsciously) of getting laid if he subscribes to feminist ideology and simps for every woman he sees; a complete left-wing SOY BOY. While he may be "involuntary celibate," he is not an incel. Incel is a complicated term, but addresses a subculture of MEN who have similar traits and is based on certain archetypical men (Elliot Rodger, Adam Lanza, and other sexless failsons). An incel, more than anything else, has a distinct set of characteristics, and it is in the spirit of the Enlightenment value that the world is knowable that I elucidate the following characteristics of the so-called incel:
1) Fascistic thinking, right wing tendencies or other forms of political radicalism.--Let's look no further than Elliot Rodger. To those of us who are high iq enough and are able to concentrate for long periods of time, to those of us who read his manifesto know that Elliot Rodger was an educated Fascist. He frequented a Barnes and Noble (or a comparable bookstore, I can't really remember) and studied Fascist philosophy and developed Fascist worldviews. Don't believe me? He lamented that his friend (I forget who) was not as right wing and authoritarian as he was. Let's now move to Seung Hui Cho, the Virginia Tech shooter. He was a Christian fanatic who plagiarized Revelation-style writing of "whores," "drunkards," and "hedonists." Clearly a political radical. Now consider Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook shooter. A self-described "turbo-virgin," who so much as never even touched a woman's hand in years, called into John Zerzan's (famous eco-anarchist) podcast lamenting the horrors of society's programming of its inhabitants. He used the example of Travis the Chimp. A chimp who, happily living into his habitat, was raised as a human would be raised. He was given a human home, raised by other humans; however, all was not well. He became fat, lazy, and watched TV all day. One day he did the monkey equivalent of "going postal." He lashed out against humans, to disastrous effect. He was immediately put down. Adam Lanza also frequently wrote how civilization is evil, and how, through institutions such as school, church, etc. indoctrinated humans into hating their own natural desires--hating their nature. Having said this, Adam Lanza was kind of psychotic. He supported normalizing pedophilia (pedosexuality, he called it) and was a latent homosexual (I am saying this after reading most of his musings, he frequently talked about wanting to be saved by a stronger, older man).
2) A certain acceptance of the blackpill.--This is common in practically every thread in which incels congregate on this website. We all know that white, skinny/fit, tall, genetically superior men have better chances of getting laid than us genetically inferior mutts. This is probably the most distinguishing characteristic that separates incels from non-incels. We accept reality as is. We recognize sex is a stepping stone to self actualization as articulated by Maslow's hierarchy of needs--and an inability to attain it leads to self-destruction, self-loathing, and unfulfillment. To not have intimacy, sex, or sexual love is to not experience one of life's greatest pleasures, and one cannot fully attain success in life without it. There will always be a "sex-sized" hole in his heart, forever agape.
3) Self-awareness.--To be incel, one must recognize oneself as incel. One must look in the mirror and see oneself as incel. The Lacanian mirror stage must occur in the psychoanalytic process of attaining self-awareness--one cannot be in denial. All of us on this website who haven't ascended know we are incels. To a certain extent, this is subsumed into number (2). One must both blackpilled and aware, as awareness is subsumed under the blackpill.
These are my requirements of the incel. Political radicalism, acceptance of the blackpill, and self-awareness--these categories, to a certain extent, riff and play off one another. In fact, you could reduce it all to accepting the blackpill; however, my point still stands. One is not an incel if he does not have these characteristics. If all incel means is involuntary celibate, we are erasing the work of our ideological and actionary predecessors. We are vastly simplifying and trivializing the movement we have created; the community, the relief we find in one another's company--is the bluepilled normie sexless soy boy
included in this movement? No, no he is not. Those of us on this website share characteristics, and these characteristics are the ones I've written about. There is still a lot of diversity in our movement--some people still argue about the validity of JBW theory and other associated theories. May we find solace in one another's struggles, and may this website continue to live on, forever and forever.
What do you think? Sorry for English errors or awkward sentences, I was listening to music while writing this.
1) Fascistic thinking, right wing tendencies or other forms of political radicalism.--Let's look no further than Elliot Rodger. To those of us who are high iq enough and are able to concentrate for long periods of time, to those of us who read his manifesto know that Elliot Rodger was an educated Fascist. He frequented a Barnes and Noble (or a comparable bookstore, I can't really remember) and studied Fascist philosophy and developed Fascist worldviews. Don't believe me? He lamented that his friend (I forget who) was not as right wing and authoritarian as he was. Let's now move to Seung Hui Cho, the Virginia Tech shooter. He was a Christian fanatic who plagiarized Revelation-style writing of "whores," "drunkards," and "hedonists." Clearly a political radical. Now consider Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook shooter. A self-described "turbo-virgin," who so much as never even touched a woman's hand in years, called into John Zerzan's (famous eco-anarchist) podcast lamenting the horrors of society's programming of its inhabitants. He used the example of Travis the Chimp. A chimp who, happily living into his habitat, was raised as a human would be raised. He was given a human home, raised by other humans; however, all was not well. He became fat, lazy, and watched TV all day. One day he did the monkey equivalent of "going postal." He lashed out against humans, to disastrous effect. He was immediately put down. Adam Lanza also frequently wrote how civilization is evil, and how, through institutions such as school, church, etc. indoctrinated humans into hating their own natural desires--hating their nature. Having said this, Adam Lanza was kind of psychotic. He supported normalizing pedophilia (pedosexuality, he called it) and was a latent homosexual (I am saying this after reading most of his musings, he frequently talked about wanting to be saved by a stronger, older man).
2) A certain acceptance of the blackpill.--This is common in practically every thread in which incels congregate on this website. We all know that white, skinny/fit, tall, genetically superior men have better chances of getting laid than us genetically inferior mutts. This is probably the most distinguishing characteristic that separates incels from non-incels. We accept reality as is. We recognize sex is a stepping stone to self actualization as articulated by Maslow's hierarchy of needs--and an inability to attain it leads to self-destruction, self-loathing, and unfulfillment. To not have intimacy, sex, or sexual love is to not experience one of life's greatest pleasures, and one cannot fully attain success in life without it. There will always be a "sex-sized" hole in his heart, forever agape.
3) Self-awareness.--To be incel, one must recognize oneself as incel. One must look in the mirror and see oneself as incel. The Lacanian mirror stage must occur in the psychoanalytic process of attaining self-awareness--one cannot be in denial. All of us on this website who haven't ascended know we are incels. To a certain extent, this is subsumed into number (2). One must both blackpilled and aware, as awareness is subsumed under the blackpill.
These are my requirements of the incel. Political radicalism, acceptance of the blackpill, and self-awareness--these categories, to a certain extent, riff and play off one another. In fact, you could reduce it all to accepting the blackpill; however, my point still stands. One is not an incel if he does not have these characteristics. If all incel means is involuntary celibate, we are erasing the work of our ideological and actionary predecessors. We are vastly simplifying and trivializing the movement we have created; the community, the relief we find in one another's company--is the bluepilled normie sexless soy boy
included in this movement? No, no he is not. Those of us on this website share characteristics, and these characteristics are the ones I've written about. There is still a lot of diversity in our movement--some people still argue about the validity of JBW theory and other associated theories. May we find solace in one another's struggles, and may this website continue to live on, forever and forever.What do you think? Sorry for English errors or awkward sentences, I was listening to music while writing this.
