Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

What are your thoughts about NAWALT?

Is NAWALT a thing?

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 17.9%
  • No

    Votes: 32 82.1%

  • Total voters
    39
  • Poll closed .
Honeypot

Honeypot

Banned
-
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
4,344
Personally I think most woman are hypergamy shits but as far as biology come there has to be at least 1% of woman who are different just for the sake of genetic mutations.

As far as my little knowledge about evolution goes it's the same, evolution also support NAWALT theory as most foids always reproduce so they perpetuate more mutations=more types of behaviour, looks, etc.

This is the inverse with males as foids wipe out most of our genetic diversity every generation that passes, in theory we should all be more similar between ourselves than the foids are between themselves, one example is that most males have high sexual drive, ease to build muscle, etc.

If someone comes with another biology or evolution theory that contradicts mine I would appreciate it in order to expand my blackpill knowledge.
 
Last edited:
Not All Women Are Like That is a lie.
 
awalt
94355
awalt
94355
awalt
94355
 
Behavior can be changed and culled but you can't change the base instincts that has been based on millions of years. AWALT is now the status. Just as we have a strong instinct to eat food when hungry, foids have a strong instinct to fuck chads.
 
Behavior can be changed and culled but you can't change the base instincts that has been based on millions of years. AWALT is now the status. Just as we have a strong instinct to eat food when hungry, foids have a strong instinct to fuck chads.
Interesting but my point is that foids perpetuate all kind of base instincts because they lacked any form of natural selection also since millions years ago. I'm surprised we don't need to force them to eat to keep being alive at this point, we always took care of everything.
 
All foids are specimens of the same species therefore AWALT.
 
It only applies to 2D tbh.
 
If 1% of women are NAWALT, that doesn't change anything for us. They'll just marry gigachads and leave the rest of the male population with typical foids.

Anyway, I've yet to see a true NAWALT unicorn, at least among the ranks of bloggers/Internet celebrities. Every "anti-feminist"/MRA/"blackpilled" Internet foid has turned out to be rabidly anti-incel, a thot who's taken dozens of Chad dicks, just doing it for money, or all of the above.
 
Not all women are hoes, most of them, an overwhelming majority, just happen to be.
 
No, AWALT tbh. Even the ones that [currently] aren't whores would become whores if they were placed in an environment which lets them slut around.
 
no man i idk most of them are but even supposed lonely,shy,ignored ones they read books or watch movies like twilights or shit which allows them to slut around atleast in that reality so given the chance they would become like that too and go only for chads
 
What about it? it's just a tool of dismissal, a get out of an argument free card.
 
You aren’t fully blackpilled if you believe NAWALT.
 
I'd say less than a percent actually are different. But it won't fix our problem, 80% of men having to compete with 1%
 
Women aren't like that if you're a Chad.
 
Personally I think most woman are hypergamy shits but as far as biology come there has to be at least 1% of woman who are different just for the sake of genetic mutations.

As far as my little knowledge about evolution goes it's the same, evolution also support NAWALT theory as most foids always reproduce so they perpetuate more mutations=more types of behaviour, looks, etc.

This is the inverse with males as foids wipe out most of our genetic diversity every generation that passes, in theory we should all be more similar between ourselves than the foids are between themselves, one example is that most males have high sexual drive, ease to build muscle, etc.

If someone comes with another biology or evolution theory that contradicts mine I would appreciate it in order to expand my blackpill knowledge.
High IQ avatar
 
NAWALT honestly is true, not every woman is cruel. Just because they fuck a lot of chads doesn't make them bad people. It's like getting mad at a cheetah for killing prey
 
Nawalts exist but the odds of finding one is smaller than the odds winning a lottery. Nevermind the fact that they would be out of our league even if you find one
 
NAWALT honestly is true, not every woman is cruel. Just because they fuck a lot of chads doesn't make them bad people. It's like getting mad at a cheetah for killing prey

It does make them bad people though if they're denying that they fuck a lot of Chads and manipulating men into believing that they don't only desire Chad (which they are).

If cheetahs could talk and manipulate people into believing that they had no interest in killing smaller animals and then came into peoples' backyards and killed their pets, I'm pretty sure people would consider them "bad" and would hate them.
 
Theres not much difference between a prostitute and a mother in the current society. Both already rode the cock carousel.
 
It does make them bad people though if they're denying that they fuck a lot of Chads and manipulating men into believing that they don't only desire Chad (which they are).

If cheetahs could talk and manipulate people into believing that they had no interest in killing smaller animals and then came into peoples' backyards and killed their pets, I'm pretty sure people would consider them "bad" and would hate them.
This analogy is creative as hell.
 
Personally I think most woman are hypergamy shits but as far as biology come there has to be at least 1% of woman who are different just for the sake of genetic mutations.
If 1% of women are NAWALT, that doesn't change anything for us. They'll just marry gigachads and leave the rest of the male population with typical foids.
Nawalts exist but the odds of finding one is smaller than the odds winning a lottery. Nevermind the fact that they would be out of our league even if you find one
Regarding the evolutionary mumbo jumbo. All stats point to men being nature's shotgun method. We have the most variation among us because we're the primary mechanism of adaptation. If 2 out of 20 men couldn't figure out how to preserve meat because they're smart due to variation then its game over. It doesn't matter that the other 10 guys are short betas, they can just carry the meat. They won't reproduce anyway.

Women are by design mediocre. You can't have two genders wildly varying because it's risky.
The sentiments of old where people used to say woman is defined by what kind of man she marries is completely true. They're assets. They follow distribution patterns of money. Top 0.001% rich have as much money relatively as 0.001% Chad.
They're not even subhuman, they're literally and unironically objects.

That being said, since they're made of same stuff as us, they still have variation, but hoping for a unicorn is path to destruction.
 
No, NAWALT doesn't exist because hypergamy as a mating strategy is strongly conserved in female brain. While can exist a woman who is better (=less hypergamous) than another one, all women are hypergamous to a degree.

From a female perspective being less hypergamous when conditions are favourable to hypergamy brings no actual advantage. It would be a positive factor if society worked as it should, practicing slutshaming and allowing a man to have certainty of paternity, for example.

The problem is, societal conditioning is evolutionarily much weaker than innate mating strategies, and since no society repressed long enough hypergamous strategies, ideally thousands of years I believe, if not a million, the neural networks for said strategy are still alive and kicking, ready to blow up at the minimal ignition.
 
NAWALT chanters only pretend to be so because of their societal pressuring that usually favours monogamy to gain acceptance amongst normalcels. Most of them knows that they need normalcel support to survive. Those who come from more liberal progressive backgrounds
or can survive without betabuxx usually don't care to chant that mantra to give hope for normalcels.
Wait a decade or so so that degenerte hypergamy becomes commonplace and no foid would bother with that mantra and rather fuck chads.
 
It does make them bad people though if they're denying that they fuck a lot of Chads and manipulating men into believing that they don't only desire Chad (which they are).

If cheetahs could talk and manipulate people into believing that they had no interest in killing smaller animals and then came into peoples' backyards and killed their pets, I'm pretty sure people would consider them "bad" and would hate them.

That's a smart analogy and much better than the dumb one that defended womyn that the other poster made.

Cheetahs have to kill to survive. Women can survive without being sluts.
 
Nope, they’re all the same, i wish NAWALT was real though
 
i believe in 99WALT tbh.
 
NAWALT may be true but it does not change anything for us as the very small fraction of NAWALT women will only go for the absolute top of men. Which means GigaChad, not incels.
 

Similar threads

daydreamER
Replies
43
Views
434
edgelordcel
edgelordcel
Balding Subhuman
Replies
8
Views
396
nvrbegan
nvrbegan
NeverGetUp
Replies
19
Views
350
Emba
Emba

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top