Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion What about violent pre/post industrial militant expansion by men?

  • Thread starter To_Live_is to_Serve
  • Start date
To_Live_is to_Serve

To_Live_is to_Serve

To_Live_is_to_Serve
Joined
Nov 24, 2019
Posts
1,462
I have been inspired by medieval vikings, mongols and Islamists when writing this post.

Imagine strong healthy men who ride around on horses, destroy cities, kill weak and ugly men, take all women, kill all women who don't follow extremely specific rules, re-forging a new global society. Imagine your are a 15-year old Chad from a tribe and want to wage war and reproduce. You ride out with your men, killing shorter, weaker, uglier, poorer less successful men than yourself. You take any loot you can carry. You get lots of bitches who are grateful to you for killing their beta men even if they will not survive the winter. Cities would disappear, forests would retake Eurasia and the Americas, you're being a great imperialist and environmentalist, you move to where you want to move waging war against sedentary people, taking their gold and their women, giving no mercy, having had sex with 100 women when you return to claim your prime JB stacies.



The world would change. After all land is taken, only these warring horse-riding tribes would remain. They fight among each other, living to relieve the world of lesser men, weaker men, uglier men as well as hunting, serving your people and fathering many sons. Their would be great comradely among the men; they are happy; they follow human nature; they eat meat for every meal and have sex with lots of women. Evolution would shift course, only the strongest most beautiful merciless tribal men speaking the same language descended from the same alpha Chad would be on the earth. Vikings built boats with which they west to America. This conquering people could conquer the world, ridding it of the pest that is weak men and humans in general. There would not be any incels; there would be happiness and there would be beauty.
 
I see your point
 
Too much reading for my high ass, tldr please... GrAYcel
 
High iq post
 
Good read @To_Live_is to_Serve, but just a far flung fantasy.

I can imagine such an outlandishly great situation for myself in a similar manner but with much less effort. Just imagine you being Chad in the modern day, that alone is enough coping material for anyone.
 
This is some extreme self hatred OP.
ridding it of the pest that is weak men and humans in general. There would not be any incels; there would be happiness and there would be beauty.
These weak men are what created all of the sciences that allow you to post here. Just because a man is strong and attractive to foids doesn't make him better than a trucel who cures aids. Its that foids and their sexual selection are retarded. Besides, eventually guns would be created and these chads would get slaughtered by the hundreds, just like in China.
 
Interesting points of view
 
That's like a comic book version of vikings and Mongols.
 
Just because a man is strong and attractive to foids doesn't make him better than a trucel who cures aids. Its that foids and their sexual selection are retarded.

Competition between tribes would be a form of natural selection favouring patriarchal tribes with little female selection.



Besides, eventually guns would be created and these chads would get slaughtered by the hundreds, just like in China.
Inventions basically require cities, geniuses and sedentary living. Things would not get invented as fat as they have been the latest 5000 years if ever.


These weak men are what created all of the sciences that allow you to post here. Just because a man is strong and attractive to foids doesn't make him better than a trucel who cures aids.

Evolution doesn't favour intelligence or morality for the sake of it. Normies and geniuses would be relieved from the world, no longer chained to it against their will in the form of their descendants. The vision I have postulated is not the most Utopian in every way but neither is the current state of the world or the most likely predictions. A man who is successful in the world I described would not be good in the sense of intelligence, inventiveness or compassion; it is a different mentality that would succeed and be considered good. The best most moral men are often not successful in the world as it is now. There would not be any incels in this world. Earth would be much more beautiful if all men killed lesser men if they could. Sedentary living, shortness, overpopulation and all misuse of the ground would not be. This forum would not need to exist as any incel would just wage war until dead or Chad status acquired,
 
Stop, you're making the female lurkers get wet in their panties.
 
There would not be any incels in this world.
80/20 still applies even here. If everyone is chad, gigachad is the new chad and the previous chads are now incels. Women are never happy with anything.
Inventions basically require cities, geniuses and sedentary living.
All of these things happened though, proving that the lifestyle you talk about was and is inferior. The world wouldn't stay full of hunter gather warbands forever because a agriculture is easier than hunting and gathering.
Evolution doesn't favour intelligence or morality for the sake of it.
That is only because foids are what select. Suppose we could reproduce without women. Don't you think the evolutionary profile would change? And evolution does favor intelligence. See european imperialism. The only thing stopping high IQ individuals from creating some virus and killing everybody is laws and copes. Tall retard chad still gets sick and dies from pneumonia, or dies from a gunshot wound or asphyxiation from a chemical agent.
Competition between tribes would be a form of natural selection favouring patriarchal tribes with little female selection.
That's not really true. Patriarchy didn't come about until the creation of agriculture. See the native americans. Many were very matriarchial.
 

Similar threads

AngryUbermensch
Replies
47
Views
604
Copexodius Maximus
Copexodius Maximus
D
Replies
27
Views
875
UnderdevelopedSlav
U
Balding Subhuman
Replies
12
Views
709
XDFLAMEBOY
XDFLAMEBOY
AshamedVirgin34
Replies
19
Views
1K
PsychoCel1
PsychoCel1
screwthefbi
Replies
7
Views
294
screwthefbi
screwthefbi

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top