Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion wh should low SMV men treat women with respect versus being an asshole if the end result is the same for them, i.e. social rejection

Bangkok or bust

Bangkok or bust

A life of poorer quality due to skull & bones
-
Joined
Mar 22, 2018
Posts
4,175
The Golden Rule is the principle of treating others as you want to be treated, but what reason do low SMV men have to be nice and gentlemanly to women or anyone for that matter, when they are going to be treated like dogshit? The implication is that you can at least expect the same treatment in return, if not, more. Okay, so what are the implications of realizing this fact? On a cost analysis basis, being a gentleman and being nice can take a lot of effort on your part if you aren't a naturally kind soul to begin with, thus, why bother going the extra mile for women who aren't going to give you any benefits for it regardless? There's no real incentive from a utilitarian point of view because the outcome in interpersonal success isn't changing. Why is this problematic? Well, this is how you breed 'misogynists' and assholes when women aren't incentivizing the correct behavior.
 
This is why normans fear incels. They know we have nothing more to lose. Afraid of the consequences.
 
THIS DUDE
Funny how society condones bullying except when it comes to short ugly men that are seen as a genetic trash by foids and normies.
 
THIS DUDE
Funny how society condones bullying except when it comes to short ugly men that are seen as a genetic trash by foids and normies.
Then they claim to support "body positivity".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top