Giracel
everything connected
★
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2025
- Posts
- 3,013
- Online time
- 1d 5h
As a young autist I was obsessed with Narnia series and probably read it at least 5 times. I am thinking about it again lately and realizing some of the characters were kind of based. For anyone who has read the series, consider the following:
Edmund Pevensie (Book 2): his three normie siblings mistreated him, and he had every right to betray them. But he wasn't exactly a great person to begin with. I would call him semi-based.
Eustace Scrubb (Book 5): by the point in the series we meet him, Edmund is older and no longer based—he and his sister Lucy are now mistreating their intellectual cousin Eustace. I remember identifying with him hugely, as I also had a normie brother-sister cousin pair I disliked, and they looked down on me bcuz I wasn't a neurotypical obsessed with latest trends. Unfortunately he too becomes un-based eventually in the story… I should've known that identifying with the initial character of Eustace was an indication of future inceldom bcuz he is basically the kind of person who grows up to become one
Edmund Pevensie (Book 2): his three normie siblings mistreated him, and he had every right to betray them. But he wasn't exactly a great person to begin with. I would call him semi-based.
Eustace Scrubb (Book 5): by the point in the series we meet him, Edmund is older and no longer based—he and his sister Lucy are now mistreating their intellectual cousin Eustace. I remember identifying with him hugely, as I also had a normie brother-sister cousin pair I disliked, and they looked down on me bcuz I wasn't a neurotypical obsessed with latest trends. Unfortunately he too becomes un-based eventually in the story… I should've known that identifying with the initial character of Eustace was an indication of future inceldom bcuz he is basically the kind of person who grows up to become one





