We need to find an uncontacted tribe of abos and make them worship ER

[DarkStar]

See, another reason why black is a stupid term. It's not even clear which black-skinned races it refers to.

Well, most Africans have sub-saharan DNA, even Ethiopians & Somalis who are mixed with Natufian(MENA)

They all have darker skin, similar skull structure/morphology, so it's a fair enough term

 

[comradespiderman29]

was just one example...

Ok

never claimed otherwise

Hitties were one of the few indo European groups in Anatolia. Most Anatolians were not indo European.

What does black mean then

People who have mostly sub Saharan DNA.

Makes no sense at all. With that logic, blondes, redheads would all be considered their own race instead of white.

Because, blondes and redheads have the same DNA as whites with dark brown hair.

 

[SoycuckGodOfReddit]

Magdalenasolismaxxing

 

[comradespiderman29]

He brought up slavs first

I brought slavs up to prove that gulf Arabs and Levantines are the same race. Just because, gulf Arabs have more Natufian DNA doesn't mean they're another race, Just like how slavs are not different just because, they have slight Asiatic DNA, and just like how Turks are not East Asian because, they have slight Asiatic DNA.
@DarkStarDown

 

[comradespiderman29]

Abos are very genetically different from Blacks & have different morphology facially

Exactly.

skin tone” it has a lot to do with genotype, hair-eye color, cephalic measurements(skull shape) as well as facial morphology which I consider the

Idk why people don't understand this. It's DNA and what the things you mentioned, which is influenced by your DNA.

 

[comradespiderman29]

Because as far as I know ''black'' just means someone with black skin which abos fulfill that requirement.

No, black is someone who PRIMARILY HAS SUB-SAHARAN DNA. It's not about skin colour, Abos are genetically different from blacks. most Africans(except northern Africans) have SUB-SAHARAN DNA. That's why they are called black Abos also have different features, compared to blacks.

 

[comradespiderman29]

I'm genuinely curious as to why the other guy can call the sentinelese black but not abos.

Because, sentelese people are believed to have sub Saharan DNA, unlike, abos. They migrated to those Islands from Africa and haven't Mixed with anyone.

 

[comradespiderman29]

Well, most Africans have sub-saharan DNA, even Ethiopians & Somalis who are mixed with Natufian(MENA)

They all have darker skin, similar skull structure/morphology, so it's a fair enough term

And Also ethiopians and somalis are primarily, sub Saharan, unlike, Turks and slavs, who barely have any gook DNA.

 

[DarkStar]

And Also ethiopians and somalis are primarily, sub Saharan, unlike, Turks and slavs, who barely have any gook DNA.

Yeah I think it's around 60% or so.

 

[comradespiderman29]

See, another reason why black is a stupid term. It's not even clear which black-skinned races it refers to.

SUB-SAHARAN Africans. And as @DarkStarDown said. Somalis/Ethiopians, Afro-Latinos, and African-Americans.

 

[Emba]

I just airdropped 20 BMWs and a few (metric) tons of vannila lattes near Ayers Rock...

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

Aren't Subsaharan Africans and Aboriginals even more distant from each other than either are from Europeans?

How the hell do greeks have congo DNA? How the hell do French have asian DNA?

For the Greks, I can imagine maybe some geneflow as a result of slave trade millenia ago, but I'm not sure about the French result there. Could be that the data they were using would be outdated by now, I've looked at the datasets and methods they used but I barely understood what they were saying there, maybe you or @DarkStarDown would understand it more and spot the mistake, I'm really not too knowledgeable on those techniques.

For these analyses, we generated new genome-wide SNP data using the Illumina 370K array from 61 Yemenis, chosen to represent all geographic regions of the country. These new data were merged with published data from the HOA [16], the Middle East [48], North Africa [43], Qatar [50], southern Africa [51], west Africa [49], the HapMap3 project [52], and the Human Genome Diversity Project [53]. After reduction to SNPs shared across all source datasets and quality control, the main merged dataset included 2,194 individuals from 81 populations for 16,766 SNPs (Table S1)

100% agreed. I was Just using slavs as an example. Wasn't calling slavs Asians lol.

Yes, most genealogists ignore anything below 5% usually,(2% and under isn't even considered lol)

Yup. Talking about actually notable admixtures, this map seems to be what that looks like:

If you get really pedantic, you can double the colored area and get maps like those two, but in that case we are really talking about very small numbers:

I just airdropped 20 BMWs and a few (metric) tons of vannila lattes near Ayers Rock...

The God of a new cargo cult has just been born.

 

[DarkStar]

Aren't Subsaharan Africans and Aboriginals even more distant from each other than either are from Europeans?


For the Greks, I can imagine maybe some geneflow as a result of slave trade millenia ago,

Not sure on that, I've seen other genetic admixture results. Not to mention, wouldn't it have also impacted other parts of the Balkans as well?

If anything, it's very minute & likely came from much older(neolithic I would guess) migrations, since if it was more recent it would be higher & more visible.

(sample I found on this site: https://thuletide.wordpress.com/202...ite-middle-easterners-clearly-race-isnt-real/)


View: https://imgur.com/buAH86V


Also from another good source for you guys to read if interested, quite well written & elaborated: https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/08/08/what-is-white-a-guide-for-complete-novices/


Minus the foid worship which is present everywhere, thuletide is a really great writer-i'm on his telegram channel even jfl.

Also shows a comprehensive list of the phenos in Europe:

Aside from Eastern types, I think I have family members from every category/sub-category here; I believe mine is a Mid-Euro type which would be Atlantid with some Alpinid influence on it.

What's interesting, is that morphology wise it seems South Euro types have more in common with North Euro types, but hair-eye color wise, East Euro types have more in common.

@comradespiderman29 @Fatass3000 @FakeFakecel

 

[FakeFakecel]

Hitties were one of the few indo European groups in Anatolia. Most Anatolians were not indo European.

Never claimed otherwise

 

[FakeFakecel]

People who have mostly sub Saharan DNA.

Says who?

Because, blondes and redheads have the same DNA as whites with dark brown hair.

A different phenotype indicates a different genotype

 

[FakeFakecel]

No, black is someone who PRIMARILY HAS SUB-SAHARAN DNA.

Says who?

have SUB-SAHARAN DNA.

"Sub saharan DNA" is such a wide fucking umbrella. Sub saharan africa is the most genetically diverse place on earth.

 

[FakeFakecel]

Because, sentelese people are believed to have sub Saharan DNA, unlike, abos. They migrated to those Islands from Africa and haven't Mixed with anyone.

You're making a lot of assumptions here. We haven't had a single North Sentinelese subject to test the genes of.

 

[FakeFakecel]

SUB-SAHARAN Africans. And as @DarkStarDown said. Somalis/Ethiopians, Afro-Latinos, and African-Americans.

But why?

 

[FakeFakecel]

What's interesting, is that morphology wise it seems South Euro types have more in common with North Euro types, but hair-eye color wise, East Euro types have more in common.

Seems like the indo-european migrations at work. They've introduced a lot of genetic material to the pool of the various regions of europe but keep in mind that it was still occupied before they arrived so it's not just completely the IE's. This curious state of affairs is caused by the differences of the pre-indo-european populations

 

[DarkStar]

Seems like the indo-european migrations at work. They've introduced a lot of genetic material to the pool of the various regions of europe but keep in mind that it was still occupied before they arrived so it's not just completely the IE's. This curious state of affairs is caused by the differences of the pre-indo-european populations

Most Europeans are a mix of ANF/EEF(already similar to Steppe/Yamnaya), Steppe, and Hunter-Gatherers, with some amounts of Natufian & Asiatic.

 

[ilieknothing]

Are abos considered black in Australia? @ilieknothing

They call themselves black but they don’t do that cause they are the same as Africans