Theory We have to justify our existence through intelligence

[torturedsubject]

if we aren’t highly accomplished doctors, engineers, software developers, biophysicists, etc. we’re useless in the eyes of the world. Doesn’t matter how kind, respectful, or hard working you are.

The only way to prove we can prove our worth to this normie world is through academic and career success. We don’t have innate value like they do. That’s why if you have an iq below 130 you might consider taking a hike up the Eiffel Tower (jk).

 

[Autist]

130 is midwit

155 minimum to be considered normal

 

[DoomThreeKoala]

Strong first post

 

[Ryo_Hazuki]

Pretty based for a first post.

The first thing you are judged on is your looks, which for the sake of this post encompasses face, hair, height, race, (perceived) age, etc.

The second thing you are judged on is your career. That's why when you meet someone outside of the workplace, the first question they ask about yourself if what you do for work. And obviously what you do for work has strong implications for not only your income, but your IQ. I know a lot of people say "it's not what you know, it's who you know" but I think this is SOMEWHAT overrated. Nepotism is obviously a think but I think we all know the average IQ of engineers, lawyers, doctors, etc is vastly higher than the average IQ of janitors, fast food workers, and warehouse workers.

But of course the problem is IQ is genetic, just like looks. In fact, it's arguably MORE genetic than looks in todays world where cosmetic surgery exists, but there's no equivalent for IQ. I know nootropics exist, but it's questionable if they're all that effective at all, and at best you're looking at a very mild (and obviously temporary) increase in cognitive ability.

This is why I'd argue out of all inherent, genetic qualities that aren't looks related (which again, includes all the things I mentioned earlier) IQ is far and away the most important.

 

[Deleted Member 8090]

I'm pretty retarded

 

[Diddy]