B
liberal are just a bunch of hypocrite. They claim to fight against fascism, but act like the Blackshirts when i dont support their candidate
Why tf are niggers confusing me for a social democrat? It's an entirely different thing you GrAYI believe in compromise with bourgeois state through liberal democracy
both libs and cuckservatives are retarded
No. Like I said, I have a mix of liberal and conservative views.
So you’re a libcuck? Because normies are woke beta soy cucks.
Far right shill, you are.
Not believing in race realism is not liberal. It's common sense
Im actually based because I'm not afraid to speak out against race "realists" who spread misinformation
LDAR libtard champion comfy safe space.
No, I'm independent. I don't side with a political party
It’s all jokes
No, race is very real
Jfl, you sound like a Redditor labeling anyone you dislike as a "
muh far right shill!"
Race "realists" and white supremacists label anyone who disagrees with them as "liberal" or "Redditor"Jfl, you sound like a Redditor labeling anyone you dislike as a "
He goons to sheboon femdom
Yeah, and you're doing the same
And it's because they follow the same dialectic as Redditors, consider that?
Nah, it's factual information
You're just in denial
And frankly, I'm happy most here acknowledge racial realism
He was a troll/LARP lolHe goons to sheboon femdom
B
The processes differ, though both still advocate for socialism. Social democrats aim for long term (gradual evolution), while democratic socialists aim for short term shift (revolutionary change)
Both rejected the idea of dictatorship of the proletariat "Becaushe dicthathorshhip of thhe prowethariath ish bad gyaahh"
, instead they believed the downfall of capitalism must be brought through an electoralism in bourgeoisie state
B
Nahh, fascist (liberal) is psychologically and ideologically close to my view or you could say I m liberal (fascist)
Social Democracy isn't even socialist, it's pro-capitalist.The processes differ, though both still advocate for socialism. Social democrats aim for long term (gradual evolution), while democratic socialists aim for short term shift (revolutionary change)
Both rejected the idea of dictatorship of the proletariat "Becaushe dicthathorshhip of thhe prowethariath ish bad gyaahh"
Dictatorships never end well nigga.
I meant that I was joking
B
I m not talking about word the way liberals used it. How they use the word: "Strong man government without our precious, PRECIOUS FREEDOMS!!"
I m talking about Dictatorship of the Proletariat. DotP are collective. The decisions of the proletariat as a class, exercised through the republic of councils, will be final and cannot be appealed by other classes, as the proletariat dismantle the capitalist society and with it the class system
No, I’d rather fund a party that actually cares for lonely single men.
Democrats fucking despises men and republicans only care for families. From how I see it.
Democrats fucking despises men and republicans only care for families. From how I see it.
Liberals are metastases in the body of the nation: They promote multicultural madness, emasculate men, sexualize children, and replace tradition with TikTok.
Nah, man. You're just anti-white. It is very simple.
You are trying to hide that behind all this pseudeo intellectual babble and anti'whote science.
Just admit it and gtfo.
I believe in might. The more power I have, the righter I am.
Nothing matters when I call ALL of the shots.
Nothing matters when I call ALL of the shots.
This is not true. Anti-racist is not code for anti-white. Claiming that anti-racist means anti-white is typical retarded right wing logic
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
