
Albertopenheimer
change ur pfp to this its only a matter of time
★★★
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2025
- Posts
- 1,291
I really thought much about the question wheter theres a need to justify it or not. But i came to the conclusion that we dont have to, heres
At the beginning i thought that if you like woman (heterosexuality) and the question is about emotions,
emotions should be used as arguments
But on the other hand there are also non-emotional arguments that speak for misoginy.
And thats where i got confused because
theres only 1 true answer
still getting 2 equaly strong arguments
But i realized that emotions arent valid in the first place, meaning non emotional arguments are stronger (which applied to the soy thought)
But than i thought about what phiolosophy was appliable to the conclusion of having two possibly true thesis
So i ended up with this possibility stick:
But no matter what, you could keep the possibility stick growing,
making it effectively infinitly long
and since infinity doesnt have an end, it makes it a rl hard question.
So i looked at the details and noticed
that no matter at what "site" you look, the misoginistic one alway meta mogs the soy one,
(what i mean with "site):
meaning that the misoginistic one makes more sense
and yh, the title was KINDA clickbait
At the beginning i thought that if you like woman (heterosexuality) and the question is about emotions,
emotions should be used as arguments
But on the other hand there are also non-emotional arguments that speak for misoginy.
And thats where i got confused because
theres only 1 true answer
still getting 2 equaly strong arguments
But i realized that emotions arent valid in the first place, meaning non emotional arguments are stronger (which applied to the soy thought)
But than i thought about what phiolosophy was appliable to the conclusion of having two possibly true thesis
So i ended up with this possibility stick:
But no matter what, you could keep the possibility stick growing,
making it effectively infinitly long
and since infinity doesnt have an end, it makes it a rl hard question.
So i looked at the details and noticed
that no matter at what "site" you look, the misoginistic one alway meta mogs the soy one,
(what i mean with "site):
meaning that the misoginistic one makes more sense
and yh, the title was KINDA clickbait