Yes, "Traditional" catholics are especially guilty of this
RageFuel We conservatives always fight among ourselves. We're disagreeable while our enemies, globohomo misandrist feminist neoliberals are like a hive mind.
State of Christianity.
incels.is
Christianity has outlived its usefulness for the WestState of Christianity.
Lefties definitely fight among themselves a lot, they just know when it's time to present a united front and they kind of hide the infighting.
Good example is the blackballing of Bernie Sanders that took place behind the scenes. And the collapse of "intersectionality", womanism vs feminism, etc. It's kind of hard to not fight among yourselves when you keep coming up with new categories of oppression and new LGBT identities every 3 seconds.
Bipartisan politics is BS anyway. Two sides of the same corporate, kosher coin.
Good example is the blackballing of Bernie Sanders that took place behind the scenes. And the collapse of "intersectionality", womanism vs feminism, etc. It's kind of hard to not fight among yourselves when you keep coming up with new categories of oppression and new LGBT identities every 3 seconds.
Bipartisan politics is BS anyway. Two sides of the same corporate, kosher coin.
its literally the exact opposite of this lol. find a single unified left wing group. even LGBT has a problem with troons. meanwhile white supremacists accept any people as long as they're vaguely related to nazism
P
Incels should fight for Islamic fundamentalism.
Islam is based but too many on the right denounce it because of its association with shitskin sand-niggers.
personality type leads to political affiliation leads to behavior as a group
think the best way to conceptualize it is "warriors" vs "shamans" or "philosophers"
warriors are self-reliant, show their aggression openly and directly, draw power and influence from personal strenght, more individualistic, less neurotic, less indiscriminately cooperative. rightwingers tend more towards this type.
intellectuals are less mentally stable (studies showed high IQ correlating with mental illnesses until they differentiated between high IQ in business and high IQ in academia. only in the later did the correlation hold), their aggression is social in nature, blaming, shaming, gaslighting, gossip etc (more feminine men, more female typical strategies and behaviors), they draw power and influence through influence over others, meaning they get their way by occupying a high position in society, so they rely on and desperately seek social status, they are more collectivist and cooperate more opportunistically.
you can see this split in almost everything, even in the prefered choice of physical activity. rightwingers go weightlifting. higher society lefties go running. rightwing politicans care about their career, leftwing politicians are true believers that care about the cause.
turns out, in a battle of group interests you don't want to be part of the group made out of independent individualists.
interdependence creates loyality and without loyality cooperation breaks down in the long term.
since those are mostly innate (genetic) predispositions, you can't make right wingers into leftists. you would have a better chance trying to subvert leftists by using their own tendencies against them, by playing their game by their rules. incels are more marginalised than all the groups leftists are championing, so there is at least a theoretical path to victory on that route.
rightwingers will en large stop being on your side or giving a fuck about you the second they themselfs are no longer affected (individualists, remember?). how many would still be invested in incels as a group if they got a girlfriend tomorrow? how many would still care enough to invest time and effort and money and accept personal risk for the cause? some few might, but as a group rightwingers won't care enough.
think the best way to conceptualize it is "warriors" vs "shamans" or "philosophers"
warriors are self-reliant, show their aggression openly and directly, draw power and influence from personal strenght, more individualistic, less neurotic, less indiscriminately cooperative. rightwingers tend more towards this type.
intellectuals are less mentally stable (studies showed high IQ correlating with mental illnesses until they differentiated between high IQ in business and high IQ in academia. only in the later did the correlation hold), their aggression is social in nature, blaming, shaming, gaslighting, gossip etc (more feminine men, more female typical strategies and behaviors), they draw power and influence through influence over others, meaning they get their way by occupying a high position in society, so they rely on and desperately seek social status, they are more collectivist and cooperate more opportunistically.
you can see this split in almost everything, even in the prefered choice of physical activity. rightwingers go weightlifting. higher society lefties go running. rightwing politicans care about their career, leftwing politicians are true believers that care about the cause.
turns out, in a battle of group interests you don't want to be part of the group made out of independent individualists.
interdependence creates loyality and without loyality cooperation breaks down in the long term.
since those are mostly innate (genetic) predispositions, you can't make right wingers into leftists. you would have a better chance trying to subvert leftists by using their own tendencies against them, by playing their game by their rules. incels are more marginalised than all the groups leftists are championing, so there is at least a theoretical path to victory on that route.
rightwingers will en large stop being on your side or giving a fuck about you the second they themselfs are no longer affected (individualists, remember?). how many would still be invested in incels as a group if they got a girlfriend tomorrow? how many would still care enough to invest time and effort and money and accept personal risk for the cause? some few might, but as a group rightwingers won't care enough.
they fight amongst themselfs about who gets to be on top, but against their enemy they are a united front. liberals and less woke lefties might argue about what exactly is "fair" or what does and does not constitude a thought crime. but they agree on common values and goals.
right has islamists, christians, Nietzsche-reading atheist, Nietzsche-reading atheist jews, neo-nazis and whom ever else can not submit to leftist dogma. how are you gonna get these groups to cooperate when they mostly don't share values, don't share goals, have just as much of a problem with each other as they have with the left?
Very insightful and brutal. This is why we need collectivism.
I have been trying to get right leaning people to collectivise more and by now I think you might have better chances trying to get the left to accept incels into their victim hierachy. At least that's in line with their innate tendencies. And if discontent in the population gets strong enough, it might eventually make sense politically for them to offer an olive branch to the male half of the voters.
Getting individualists to collectivise is like teaching a fish to ride a bike.
And I can relate to their unwillingness to betray their nature. I'm more left leaning, and I couldn't become an individualist on command either, even if it made sense or was advantegous.
Getting individualists to collectivise is like teaching a fish to ride a bike.
And I can relate to their unwillingness to betray their nature. I'm more left leaning, and I couldn't become an individualist on command either, even if it made sense or was advantegous.
dude they have all the power in the land and use what ever divide and conquer trick out there to attack their opponents. the thing is that trump got attacked so hard because his unite-the-right was strategic genius. the thing is that the right is actually the diverse side and the libs really are the hivemind conformists masquerading as underdog rebels. because who wants to be an evil whitey when you can masquerade as a rebel and stomp out anyone else and project your own crap onto your targets.
yep I'm into pairing things from the past with modern technology because this progressivist shit sucks and is creating social problems.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
