.
if you'd ask soycealists and kommies, they will say yes definitely,
if you'd ask westernised normies, they'll cry MUH KULCHARAL REBOLUSHAN REEE MILLIONS OF CHINKS DIED REEE DEY KILLED SPARROWS AND RESULTED IN BUGS EPIDEMIC AND FAMINE REEE
realitiy is it's mixed bag of things
- the REASON communists in china gained power over the nationalist Kwomitang IS SIMPLY BECAUSE AMERICANS CEASED BACKING NATIONALISTS AT VERY KEY MOMENT IN THEIR FIGHT AGAINST COMMUNISTS, THE AMERICAN COMMANDER WAS GIVEN ORDER TO RETREAT IN MIDDLE OF BUILDING STRATEGIES WITH THE NATIONALISTS TO COUNTER INCOMING COMMUNIST AGGRESSION FROM NORTH; so they were "ALLOWED" to go down as kommies by then powers who defeated the Nazis and Imperial Japanese
- Mao's policies against opium farming and selling and all were quite nice in its execution though, it wasn't done by just use of brute force but those sellers and farmers were given options to grow and sell food crops or do other productive things and getting paid for all that; while they opened rehab centres for opium addicts and all - overall their anti-narcotic program was a big success
- one argument that Soycealists and others often make is Mao's regime was brutal over "anti socialist-chinese traitorous" elements in the vast region of china - that means they did all brutalities to suppress any random movement against communist takeover of china, and by virtue of that they were able to secure themselves from external sabotage from other world powers notably anglosphere that were itching to break them apart again after "temporary" retreat in post-ww2 world
but i don't fully agree with this argument
- The china that Mao left behind, despite being poverty striken and malnutritioned and all; was actually strong enough to keep all their subjects united (by either communist unionism instilled among people or just plain common sense of sticking together) against all kind of internal and external ;separatism; or ;revolts; so he solved big problem they had had in past and successors like Deng Xiao Ping etc could cut deals with the western powers to gain manufacturing et al from them without compromising national security aspects
so that way a big yes
and what not
but i am ardent opposer of soycealism so even if he was all goodie goodie i shall never consider that motherfucker as based
if you'd ask westernised normies, they'll cry MUH KULCHARAL REBOLUSHAN REEE MILLIONS OF CHINKS DIED REEE DEY KILLED SPARROWS AND RESULTED IN BUGS EPIDEMIC AND FAMINE REEE
realitiy is it's mixed bag of things
- the REASON communists in china gained power over the nationalist Kwomitang IS SIMPLY BECAUSE AMERICANS CEASED BACKING NATIONALISTS AT VERY KEY MOMENT IN THEIR FIGHT AGAINST COMMUNISTS, THE AMERICAN COMMANDER WAS GIVEN ORDER TO RETREAT IN MIDDLE OF BUILDING STRATEGIES WITH THE NATIONALISTS TO COUNTER INCOMING COMMUNIST AGGRESSION FROM NORTH; so they were "ALLOWED" to go down as kommies by then powers who defeated the Nazis and Imperial Japanese
- Mao's policies against opium farming and selling and all were quite nice in its execution though, it wasn't done by just use of brute force but those sellers and farmers were given options to grow and sell food crops or do other productive things and getting paid for all that; while they opened rehab centres for opium addicts and all - overall their anti-narcotic program was a big success
- one argument that Soycealists and others often make is Mao's regime was brutal over "anti socialist-chinese traitorous" elements in the vast region of china - that means they did all brutalities to suppress any random movement against communist takeover of china, and by virtue of that they were able to secure themselves from external sabotage from other world powers notably anglosphere that were itching to break them apart again after "temporary" retreat in post-ww2 world
but i don't fully agree with this argument
- The china that Mao left behind, despite being poverty striken and malnutritioned and all; was actually strong enough to keep all their subjects united (by either communist unionism instilled among people or just plain common sense of sticking together) against all kind of internal and external ;separatism; or ;revolts; so he solved big problem they had had in past and successors like Deng Xiao Ping etc could cut deals with the western powers to gain manufacturing et al from them without compromising national security aspects
so that way a big yes
and what not
but i am ardent opposer of soycealism so even if he was all goodie goodie i shall never consider that motherfucker as based
Mao should have nuked Central and Southern India.
He was the greatest man to ever live on this earth.
Knowledgeable curry.
mao was a super good military commander, but horrible ruler that led to disasterous results. in addition, he was also a massive feminist
Joking or not, this isn't based
www.scmp.com
his campaigns destroyed traditional Chinese culture which many involved oppressing foids. Now CCP has brought back the worst of chink culture (such as wagecuck) without the good parts (keep foids at home)
Joking or not, this isn't based
Mao offered 10m women for trade with US
Mao Zedong proposed sending 10 million women to the United States during talks with top US envoy Henry Kissinger in 1973, according to newly released documents.
www.scmp.com
his campaigns destroyed traditional Chinese culture which many involved oppressing foids. Now CCP has brought back the worst of chink culture (such as wagecuck) without the good parts (keep foids at home)
The kmt was so bad that CCP easily won over them.
Still, I wished Qing dynasty (something like it) could continue. Much more based than current China
In addition I'd say the shit that happened in cultural revolution were probably true. CCP is top-down and the bottom obey without any questions, sometimes they fake results to gain more "points" in the eyes of the leaders or to preserve their positions/lives
Probably killed the most people of any man ever tbh
I used to worship him as a reddit commie (in my 2014-2016 phase), but now I look back, he's a mixed man
Should have just Nuked India entirely and everything around it too. Less cels on the planet, less overall suffering.
The curries would have made him eat a good few nukes themselves but hey, it is what it is.
he is ideal commie leader for all edgy teens; but once you get over it you may realise he was just average
Deng Xiao Ping was much better leader than him
No fuck that commie
< commie
< based
The absolute state of .is
< based
The absolute state of .is
Greater than ER?
My thought exactly. Sexual liberation of foids it's a common thing among socialists leaders. Lenin had a phrase about this, couldn't find it or remember it though.
Would you say Mao created the environment for the birth of the lie-flat movement and for China to become one of the main incel nations today?
no opinion
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
