giribot
Autistic ShoegazeCel
★
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2023
- Posts
- 82
He is the face of incel ideology because of how people praise him, but did he actually follow blackpill philosphy? Throughout his manifesto, I was hoping to find hints of fatalism embedded in his thoughts, but I don't think he ever got to the point of that. He felt frustrated and angry, but I always felt that he aligned more with redpill than blackpill. An example of this was after Halloween when he was 18 years old where he described that he felt terrified after being approached by "a group of thugs", so that led to his "commitment to start exercising and lifting weights" to increase his confidence. He even thought this would make foids go after him.
Don't get me wrong, I understand that his actions towards foids meant that he *lost hope*, but he still wanted to fight. He still wanted to fight the unfairness in the world instead of LDAR. He believed he was destined for greatness, quite literally the opposite of what blackpill is about (there's nothing to change, there's nothing to do, there's nothing for the individual who believes in it to do about the unfairness of the world).
One of the quotes that stuck out to me was this one:
To be angry about the injustices one faces is a sign of strength. It is a sign that one has the will to fight back against those injustices, rather than bowing down and accepting it as fate.
Instead of placing emphasis on ER and his violent actions, why don't we place emphasis on the individuals who truly believe in the blackpill philosophy? I mean, who are those people anyways?
In brief, I just wanted to ask that. I'm open to all perspectives, just curious what everyone thinks. I might expand to this post in the future if I think of any other examples from his perspective.
Don't get me wrong, I understand that his actions towards foids meant that he *lost hope*, but he still wanted to fight. He still wanted to fight the unfairness in the world instead of LDAR. He believed he was destined for greatness, quite literally the opposite of what blackpill is about (there's nothing to change, there's nothing to do, there's nothing for the individual who believes in it to do about the unfairness of the world).
One of the quotes that stuck out to me was this one:
To be angry about the injustices one faces is a sign of strength. It is a sign that one has the will to fight back against those injustices, rather than bowing down and accepting it as fate.
Instead of placing emphasis on ER and his violent actions, why don't we place emphasis on the individuals who truly believe in the blackpill philosophy? I mean, who are those people anyways?
In brief, I just wanted to ask that. I'm open to all perspectives, just curious what everyone thinks. I might expand to this post in the future if I think of any other examples from his perspective.