I believe it is of fundamental importance to address the collective writings presented in Henry David Thoreau's "Walden." The book illustrates the degradation of the working man and his spirit through dehumanization and the bourgeoise class undermining the proletariat. While such controversial views remind us of the obtruding sentiment of Marxism, we must consider the significance of his texts, and how they may relate to our cause.
"ever lived a more simple and meagre life than the poor. The ancient philosophers, Chinese, Hindoo, Persian, and Greek, were a class than which none has been poorer in outward riches, none so rich in inward. We know not much about them. It is remarkable that we know so much of them as we do. The same is true of the more modern reformers and benefactors of their race. None can be an impartial or wise observer of human life but from the vantage ground of what we should call voluntary poverty. Of a life of luxury the fruit is luxury, whether in agriculture, or commerce, or literature, or art. There are nowadays professors of philosophy, but not philosophers. Yet it is admirable to profess because it was once admirable to live. To be a philosopher is not merely to have subtle thoughts, nor even to found a school, but so to love wisdom as to live according to its dictates, a life of simplicity, independence, magnanimity, and trust. It is to solve some of the problems of life, not only theoretically, but practically. The success of great scholars and thinkers is commonly a courtier-like success, not kingly, not manly. They make shift to live merely by conformity, practically as their fathers did, and are in no sense the progenitors of a nobler race of men. But why do men degenerate ever? What makes families run out? What is the nature of the luxury which enervates and destroys nations? Are we sure that there is none of it in our own lives? The philosopher is in advance of his age even in the outward form of his life. He is not fed, sheltered, clothed, warmed, like his contemporaries. How can a man be a philosopher and not maintain his vital heat by better methods than other men? " (Economy
This paragraph in Economy represents the bourgeoise class invasion of the arts and culture. They have invaded our civilization, reducing us to automated beings focused primarily on our frivolous efforts at accumulating that which satisfies our desires of hunger, lust, and drive. Man has been reduced to only a process that continues through generations and generations. A cyclical process in which no divine purpose is involved with this new mechanized being. Through these means, Cultural Marxism implants its pluralist roots further into our civilization, systematically eradicating the remaining elements of idealism and classicism. Capitalism and Communism serve as an axis of evil; infringing upon our rights as men. This paragraph in Walden represents how these evil forces have taken away the former values of Antiquity. They have replaced us with a form of subtle servitude, disguised in its most pernicious manifest forms as something friendly to us. They disguised our labor as an appurtenant aspect of our identity. Furthermore, the celebration of labor (Marxism leads to inevitable degradation, with the lowering of a class standard. Capitalism is the celebration of the material property which it brings. This only brings suffering to the individual which receives such gifts from labor. He desires something MORE then what he has earned. He can no longer take the antiquated systems of Marxism and Capitalism, desiring something anew. Despite the subtle Socialist leanings of Walden, we can read between the lines of your average Aryan man. We can interpret his true meaning when he says such things, and I believe this serves as an accurate representation of how Western man has been dehumanized and deracialized.
"ever lived a more simple and meagre life than the poor. The ancient philosophers, Chinese, Hindoo, Persian, and Greek, were a class than which none has been poorer in outward riches, none so rich in inward. We know not much about them. It is remarkable that we know so much of them as we do. The same is true of the more modern reformers and benefactors of their race. None can be an impartial or wise observer of human life but from the vantage ground of what we should call voluntary poverty. Of a life of luxury the fruit is luxury, whether in agriculture, or commerce, or literature, or art. There are nowadays professors of philosophy, but not philosophers. Yet it is admirable to profess because it was once admirable to live. To be a philosopher is not merely to have subtle thoughts, nor even to found a school, but so to love wisdom as to live according to its dictates, a life of simplicity, independence, magnanimity, and trust. It is to solve some of the problems of life, not only theoretically, but practically. The success of great scholars and thinkers is commonly a courtier-like success, not kingly, not manly. They make shift to live merely by conformity, practically as their fathers did, and are in no sense the progenitors of a nobler race of men. But why do men degenerate ever? What makes families run out? What is the nature of the luxury which enervates and destroys nations? Are we sure that there is none of it in our own lives? The philosopher is in advance of his age even in the outward form of his life. He is not fed, sheltered, clothed, warmed, like his contemporaries. How can a man be a philosopher and not maintain his vital heat by better methods than other men? " (Economy
This paragraph in Economy represents the bourgeoise class invasion of the arts and culture. They have invaded our civilization, reducing us to automated beings focused primarily on our frivolous efforts at accumulating that which satisfies our desires of hunger, lust, and drive. Man has been reduced to only a process that continues through generations and generations. A cyclical process in which no divine purpose is involved with this new mechanized being. Through these means, Cultural Marxism implants its pluralist roots further into our civilization, systematically eradicating the remaining elements of idealism and classicism. Capitalism and Communism serve as an axis of evil; infringing upon our rights as men. This paragraph in Walden represents how these evil forces have taken away the former values of Antiquity. They have replaced us with a form of subtle servitude, disguised in its most pernicious manifest forms as something friendly to us. They disguised our labor as an appurtenant aspect of our identity. Furthermore, the celebration of labor (Marxism leads to inevitable degradation, with the lowering of a class standard. Capitalism is the celebration of the material property which it brings. This only brings suffering to the individual which receives such gifts from labor. He desires something MORE then what he has earned. He can no longer take the antiquated systems of Marxism and Capitalism, desiring something anew. Despite the subtle Socialist leanings of Walden, we can read between the lines of your average Aryan man. We can interpret his true meaning when he says such things, and I believe this serves as an accurate representation of how Western man has been dehumanized and deracialized.
