Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Violence against women should be normalized

MuddyBuddy

MuddyBuddy

It's pointless
★★★★
Joined
Jul 27, 2021
Posts
1,367
Online time
3m 59s
I really do believe a major issue facing our culture is that women straight up have no idea how to talk to men. I mean this in the sense that women will cross boundaries of discourse with zero repercussions where if a man crosses that same boundary they are open to physical confrontation. We as men are intuitively aware of this when we are around other men. When you are talking to another man there is this unspoken understanding that if either of you "cross the line" then violence is on the table. However even more importantly the culture as a whole has an intuitive understanding of where this line is and if it is crossed than using violence is morally permissible.

When the dynamic is changed to a male-female interaction the bar is raised so drastically high that almost anything is permissible for the woman to engage in. Unless she is literally a clear threat to your life with a knife/gun then any use of violence is subject to the most harsh moral condemnation by soyciety. And even under certain situations lethal threat still may not serve as a moral justification. Women being raised this way has drastically changed the way they interact with men. To the point where you can have sitting congresswomen laughing at short men and getting praised for it by her constituents. This really speaks to how far women know they can push men.

Now I'm not saying the bar should be lowered to be on par with men. You can call me cucked for still holding onto the principle of some chivalrous standards idc. However what is clear is the bar for women needs to be lowered quite substantially. When men interact they realize that in the event of disrespectful remarks; violence is on the table. But again more importantly soyciety morally permits violence under such circumstances. Women need to feel that their words have real violent consequences. They need to feel that if a line is crossed then violence is on the table but more importantly soyciety will not morally condemn the men who use violence on these women.

This GoT clips highlights it very well imo. Now if a man had belittled Robert's masculinity in this way he would likely get killed or seriously beaten up. However when his wife does it...she gets a slap on the face. I think that is a fairly proportionate response and one our soycierty should normalize. Doing so will help raised women who understand how to actually talk to men.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sAk5cHp0-M


I have more thoughts on this as well I might discuss at some point. Specifically how the lack of a violent option for men against women leaves them with no defense and how this seriously fucks with them.
 
Last edited:
The saying "never hit a woman" has always seemed misguided to me. It assumes that women exist outside the bounds of moral reciprocity, as if their actions could not carry the same weight as a man's. I think the principle should be that no one should hit anyone without just cause, but if a woman attacks a man or deliberately crosses a line that would provoke a fight between men, she should not be treated as untouchable. Equality, if it is to mean anything, must also include accountability.
 
New IT ragebait just dropped.
 
Glowing today i see:feelsLSD:. IT add me to the screenshot.


I really do believe a major issue facing our culture is that women straight up have no idea how to talk to men.
what are you even talking about? Women have no issues talking or approaching men.
 
Despite clickbaiting title - i fully agree.
Right now foids are untouchable, they're like children getting away with anything without consequences.
 
I was attacked by a foid with knife once. Let's just say, it didn't end up best for her. :feelsokman:
 
I believe this is because at one point foids were respectful to men the men who beat them were actually disgusting

As culture has changed that hasn't now we get disrespected and even beat by women and if we dare do anything about it we have the little freedom left taken from us
 
I believe this is because at one point foids were respectful to men the men who beat them were actually disgusting
beating is one thing. but understanding that words can lead to physical confrontation is another. if you gave a group of people the ability to say literally anything with zero repercussions it should come as no surprise that some will do so. if women were aware that disrespecting a man could lead to getting hurt it's obvious less would do so.
 
I really do believe a major issue facing our culture is that women straight up have no idea how to talk to men. I mean this in the sense that women will cross boundaries of discourse with zero repercussions where if a man crosses that same boundary they are open to physical confrontation. We as men are intuitively aware of this when we are around other men. When you are talking to another man there is this unspoken understanding that if either of you "cross the line" then violence is on the table. However even more importantly the culture as a whole has an intuitive understanding of where this line is and if it is crossed than using violence is morally permissible.

When the dynamic is changed to a male-female interaction the bar is raised so drastically high that almost anything is permissible for the woman to engage in. Unless she is literally a clear threat to your life with a knife/gun then any use of violence is subject to the most harsh moral condemnation by soyciety. And even under certain situations lethal threat still may not serve as a moral justification. Women being raised this way has drastically changed the way they interact with men. To the point where you can have sitting congresswomen laughing at short men and getting praised for it by her constituents. This really speaks to how far women know they can push men.

Now I'm not saying the bar should be lowered to be on par with men. You can call me cucked for still holding onto the principle of some chivalrous standards idc. However what is clear is the bar for women needs to be lowered quite substantially. When men interact they realize that in the event of disrespectful remarks; violence is on the table. But again more importantly soyciety morally permits violence under such circumstances. Women need to feel that their words have real violent consequences. They need to feel that if a line is crossed then violence is on the table but more importantly soyciety will not morally condemn the men who use violence on these women.

This GoT clips highlights it very well imo. Now if a man had belittled Robert's masculinity in this way he would likely get killed or seriously beaten up. However when his wife does it...she gets a slap on the face. I think that is a fairly proportionate response and one our soycierty should normalize. Doing so will help raised women who understand how to actually talk to men.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sAk5cHp0-M


I have more thoughts on this as well I might discuss at some point. Specifically how the lack of a violent option for men against women leaves them with no defense and how this seriously fucks with them.

I hate it when blackmailing foids hide behind the excuse of "being a woman" when they screw up. I hope the defense against tantrum-throwing foids gets fewer fines, although that's difficult...
 
Contrary to what Foids believe, men are more likley to get murdered. VAW has been round for a while.
It's not going to improve (Thank god), cuz the superheroes (incels) will make sure it won't improve.
 
women deserve equals rights and lefts :feelsBox:
 
They treat foids like kids it seems only Chris brown didn't.
 

Similar threads

Ricecel Sungnodius
Replies
7
Views
325
FastBlast
FastBlast
esdeathlover
Replies
3
Views
120
orthodox
orthodox
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
2
Views
278
SlayerSlayer
SlayerSlayer
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
5
Views
209
Lv99_BixNood
Lv99_BixNood
FastBlast
Replies
34
Views
514
nihilum
nihilum

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top