"In criminal law, entrapment is a practice whereby a law enforcement agent induces a person to commit a criminal offence that the person would have otherwise been unlikely or unwilling to commit."
That's why I think these entrapment schemes are unjust. eg. Chris Hansen shit.
FIRST they snare a guy with a fake profile/account where *GASP* a woman actually wants to talk to you!
And not only does she want to talk to you, she talks to you properly and openly and with interest. If you're a guy who's unattractive, this is almost unheard of online. Most women will never talk to you properly. You're lucky if you get a one sentence reply for every 30-40 messages you send on a dating site.
So they build a connection with these guys and give them hope. Finally someone is interested. Then they typically spring it on the guy that she's 13-15 years old, which is a borderline age physically. Many girls that age are quite physically mature even if the law protects them for good reason. And the guys weight it mentally and make the wrong choice to still meet up.
But can you blame the guys that much? These almost certainly and almost universally aren't guys who are going out of their way to rape children. They're guys who got baited by a scam and manipulated with their loneliness, isolation, and desperation used against them. Almost all of these guys would never rape a child. They just got baited unnaturally into a situation where they could then be arrested or shamed.
Didn't watch the OP because I hate watching these sorts of things, as I think they're ethically wrong for all parties involved.
