Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL [VIDEO] Agecucks are claiming AI CP is a "problem"

Overman

Overman

Real bees get the h(m)oney
★★★★
Joined
May 15, 2022
Posts
809

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCNAUoQcgHo


Personally I am more fond of MILFs and such, but this is fucking ridiculous, I suppose the notion that child grape is harmful has merit, but seriously? "We gotta stop the AI from making CP":soy: Just let people create what they wish, it's not harming anybody if you think about it the entire CP market would probably collapse if you could just generate images without messing with a kid.

Age cucks are fucking stupid, and a lot of them are so obsessed with it they're clearly kid fuckers, like IT is actually incels.
 
argument being it will create attraction towards foid child which can lead to real life trouble.
 
You really have zero understanding of how fucked up it would be to be able to create realistic depictions of child abuse? Not even a little understanding? I don't think you're that dense. I think what you mean to say is "I realize this is fucked up, but let me it do it anyway because caring about this is soy."
 
You really have zero understanding of how fucked up it would be to be able to create realistic depictions of child abuse? Not even a little understanding? I don't think you're that dense. I think what you mean to say is "I realize this is fucked up, but let me it do it anyway because caring about this is soy."
Yeah I agree with this nigga. If your a pedo you should kys. Also this is not the hill to die on my nigga. THere are so many more worthy battles than defending AI generated CP.
 
argument being it will create attraction towards foid child which can lead to real life trouble.
Bad argument, millions of people are attracted to kids, it's really not uncommon, there's like 50 million pred catching channels. If anything it would satisfy that fetish and keep people from doing it to kids irl
 
You really have zero understanding of how fucked up it would be to be able to create realistic depictions of child abuse? Not even a little understanding? I don't think you're that dense. I think what you mean to say is "I realize this is fucked up, but let me it do it anyway because caring about this is soy."
Nope, I agree with my original statement.
 
Get out of here faggot
 

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCNAUoQcgHo


Personally I am more fond of MILFs and such, but this is fucking ridiculous, I suppose the notion that child grape is harmful has merit, but seriously? "We gotta stop the AI from making CP":soy: Just let people create what they wish, it's not harming anybody if you think about it the entire CP market would probably collapse if you could just generate images without messing with a kid.

Age cucks are fucking stupid, and a lot of them are so obsessed with it they're clearly kid fuckers, like IT is actually incels.

no children are being harmed towards it
 
no children are being harmed towards it
It makes no sense. It's always "my body, my choice," "don't tread on me and what I do in the bedroom, fascist government" until it's some pedophile jerking off to AI-generated pixels.
 
I'm sure if a JB stacy hit you up you would ascend for certain
we're talking about prepubescent children, not teenagers right?

If you're talking about prepubescent children get out of here faggot
 
Natural
 
Depends. The definition of pedophilia has been wildly exaggerated.
I think the line should be drawn where another person is legitimately harmed, anything else is a dangerous slippery slope.

But I agree also, I can understand being attracted to 15, 16 17, because every straight man is, but some mfers are into infants and 5 year olds and shit, which I reluctantly say we must allow people to create such things and keep to themselves or else what is the alternative? They will seek it out organically in the wild.
 
Braindead tier
 
normalfag seethe :feelshmm: you got to love it :feelsmusic:
 
Yeah I agree with this nigga. If your a pedo you should kys. Also this is not the hill to die on my nigga. THere are so many more worthy battles than defending AI generated CP.
 
I would rather generate 2d (lolis included) characters rather than 3d disgusting foids (no matter the age). Also normalfags think that pixels on the screen have feeling and are real that's why they want to ban violence in GTA 6 :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: I bet we also won't have hookers and stripclubs because those zoomeretards.
 
Last edited:
You really have zero understanding of how fucked up it would be to be able to create realistic depictions of child abuse? Not even a little understanding? I don't think you're that dense. I think what you mean to say is "I realize this is fucked up, but let me it do it anyway because caring about this is soy."
 
Shotgunmax your face off, pedo fuck
 

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCNAUoQcgHo


Personally I am more fond of MILFs and such, but this is fucking ridiculous, I suppose the notion that child grape is harmful has merit, but seriously? "We gotta stop the AI from making CP":soy: Just let people create what they wish, it's not harming anybody if you think about it the entire CP market would probably collapse if you could just generate images without messing with a kid.

Age cucks are fucking stupid, and a lot of them are so obsessed with it they're clearly kid fuckers, like IT is actually incels.

Anyone who wants to forbid AI to generate cp images really wants to forbid AI in general.
There is no viable way to stop AI doing this.
In its training set, there are (clothed) children and nude women and once AI knows how children and nudity look like it can just combine both.
You can rigorously filter the training data, but this would cripple it's capabilities.
For example, it's not enough to just remove images of children, if there were images of fictional dwarves in the training set, then you'd just say "naked dwarves", etc.
That's what AI is all about, the ability to recombine different concepts like a guinea pig with fish scales.
It can only work if you completely ban local AI and make it only accessible through web APIs from big NWO-corpos.

Welcome to the new world order where you will own nothing.

There's no point discussing this question because you can only end it if you end AI completely.
Sure, you can make it illegal and in most countries the existing laws already forbid it, but you cannot stop the theoretical capability.
 
Hating pedos Is a normie cuck trait
 
I think many people just openly hate pedos because it is still socially accepted, they hate them because they are different, not because they love differently. If hating homosexuals were still socially accepted, they'd do that as well - but as it is not, they are now virtue signalling for them.

My personal opinion is that it's just about harm: When there is harm, it's bad, but when there is no harm, it's not bad. As long no actual person is harmed I don't care about what anyone jerks off to.
 
OP spotted in the wilderness.
52689.jpg
 
if you think about it the entire CP market would probably collapse if you could just generate images without messing with a kid
correct, the financial backers of the anti-AI movement are addicted to the idea of real children suffering (they are jews after all, look at their metzitza) and make a lot of money off of established sex-trafficking and blackmail networks, so the last thing they want is to lose their stranglehold on the MAP-coomer market as this would decimate their ability to control civilization and engage in their ritualistic kabbalic sadism

we're talking about prepubescent children, not teenagers right?
If you're talking about prepubescent children get out of here faggot
the term jailbait has never been used to describe prepubescent children
the idea of jailbait is they're 1-2 years below the age of consent but look old enough that you assume they're legal
ie the 15yo with bigger tits than most 25yos
The idea is that they are developed enough to bait the average man (attracted to a fertile womb - perfectly healthy) into violating AOC, maybe even without knowing it.

If there's a bunch of nepiophiles out there saying toddlers are "jailbait" because they're tempted to rape them, they're using the term disingenuously and you should not indulge their rape of the English language, it's bad enough they have made so much headway in obfuscating other terminology like lolicon and pedophile.

I can understand being attracted to 15, 16 17, because every straight man is, but some mfers are into infants and 5 year olds and shit
jfl at conveniently jumping past the 6-14 range

I reluctantly say we must allow people to create such things and keep to themselves or else what is the alternative? They will seek it out organically in the wild.
That's not a guarantee, like I don't think every guy who wants to fuck a lioness and looks at artwork of that would necessarily go fuck a lioness just because lioness porn gets outlawed the draw.

but I imagine the effect of diminishing offenses via an outlet probably outways the effect of generating offenses via fetishizing.
 
Last edited:
At the moment, I am quite okay with it. It'd probably be similar to ,,microdosage" for actual child pornography users.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top