Oh, and since some college cunt has proclaimed this "syndrome", that makes it real?
Do you think "syndrome" in this context is somehow offensive?
Many things are syndromes. Why dose this offend you? Do you think the word "syndrome" implies something wrong on our behalf? Because that's not what I was implying.
Also, you should be glad that a college attendee is even covering this; we know how ideologically compromised colleges are.
I'm "sort of" a fucktard??
believing the pseudo-medical inventions that sweep our life histories under the carpet,
This wasn't my intention, but why do you think it was?
it's simply political malfeasance,
Both of these things can be true at the same time; We are not having our needs met
AND the government is performing a criminal injustice by marginalizing us.
keep shlepping for the psychiatric gestapo that enjoys dismissing us, stigmatizing us, blaming us.
Nigga, that's not what I'm doing. I'm doing the opposite; I'm pointing out that when men have little to no prospects of their romantic and/or sexual needs being met, they begin to resent the society the live in and that it's a good idea to help them.
If you're hung up about the "syndrome" part, it's more of a "tendency" than anything else. The etymology of the word shows that it means "concurrence". In this context, it just means that there's a "concurrence" between men not having their needs met and societies suffering as a result.
I'm literally showing how it's a historical phenomenon that can't be handwaved away by society.
Leave this forum, all who prattle like you.
You have no authority over me.
