E
Bluepilled logic: "if women reject you it's your fault"
here's the problem with this logic. What cucks try to suggest is "you aren't showering or you have bad personality or some shit and women reject you because of it thus it's your fault women reject you". What they are suggesting is that what we do or some traits we have or whatever it might be is the reason why women reject us, and thus we caused the woman to reject this. Therefore, it's our fault women reject us. According to their logic, if we do something and it causes someone to do something, it's our fault not theirs. Let's use this logic for rape.
We are in a scenario where a rapist is planning to commit a rape and he searches specifically for an intoxicated woman, whether he intoxicates her drink or she gets drunk by herself. A woman at the frat party gets extremely drunk to the extent that she's incapacitated. The rapist sees the woman and decides "there's my next victim" and then rapes her. People would say it isn't her fault. According to bluepilled logic, it is her fault.
According to cucks, what we do, our actions, our traits or whatever it might be caused these women to reject us and otherwise the woman wouldn't have rejected us, thus it's our fault. According to their logic, because the rapist looked for an intoxicated victim, he wouldn't have raped this woman if she was intoxicated and thus her deciding to get extremely drunk is what caused the rape because otherwise he'd look for another victim who was drunk. For example, when Chanel Miller got extremely drunk unconscious, Brock Turner saw her behind the dumpster and decided to digitally penetrate her. If she was conscious he probably wouldn't do it as far as i know. According to bluepilled logic, it's her fault because if she wasn't passed out drunk he wouldn't have done it because this wouldn't be an opportunity to digitally rape a woman with a chance of her (or anyone else) never knowing about it (he would've gotten away with it and she and no one else would know about it if those bicyclists didn't ride their bike there). Her being blackout drunk and the chance of him digitally penetrating her with a chance of nobody (not even her because she's blackout) finding out made him wanna do what he did. If she didn't get drunk he wouldn't do it. According to cuck logic, it's Chanel's fault.
Yet cucks won't apply this logic to these scenarios because it's politically incorrect but this is just the special pleading fallacy. facts don't care about our emotions/feelings and facts don't care about political correctness. if we don't apply this same logic to the rape scenario we're inconsistent hypocrites with double standards.
if a woman rejects you it's her fault not yours. why? because even if your traits have to do with why she rejected you, she's the one who decides if she'll date you or not. Thus, she's the cause of whether you got rejected or not. Something being one's fault is about whether they caused it or not. Therefore, it's her fault. Same thing with the rapist because the rapist decides if you get raped or not. You aren't the one who chooses if you rejected or not (that's why it's INvoluntary celibacy not voluntary celibacy) and rape victims don't choose to be raped (being raped is involuntary or against your will). The only rape that is voluntary is statutory rape, but that's only legally rape, and what is considered statutory rape varies by country. In South Korea, consensual sex with a 19 year old is legally rape but in Italy, sex with a 14 year old isn't statutory rape (aka legally rape).
@Mainländer @Robtical @JosefMengelecel @your personality @-BrettyBoy- thoughts?
here's the problem with this logic. What cucks try to suggest is "you aren't showering or you have bad personality or some shit and women reject you because of it thus it's your fault women reject you". What they are suggesting is that what we do or some traits we have or whatever it might be is the reason why women reject us, and thus we caused the woman to reject this. Therefore, it's our fault women reject us. According to their logic, if we do something and it causes someone to do something, it's our fault not theirs. Let's use this logic for rape.
We are in a scenario where a rapist is planning to commit a rape and he searches specifically for an intoxicated woman, whether he intoxicates her drink or she gets drunk by herself. A woman at the frat party gets extremely drunk to the extent that she's incapacitated. The rapist sees the woman and decides "there's my next victim" and then rapes her. People would say it isn't her fault. According to bluepilled logic, it is her fault.
According to cucks, what we do, our actions, our traits or whatever it might be caused these women to reject us and otherwise the woman wouldn't have rejected us, thus it's our fault. According to their logic, because the rapist looked for an intoxicated victim, he wouldn't have raped this woman if she was intoxicated and thus her deciding to get extremely drunk is what caused the rape because otherwise he'd look for another victim who was drunk. For example, when Chanel Miller got extremely drunk unconscious, Brock Turner saw her behind the dumpster and decided to digitally penetrate her. If she was conscious he probably wouldn't do it as far as i know. According to bluepilled logic, it's her fault because if she wasn't passed out drunk he wouldn't have done it because this wouldn't be an opportunity to digitally rape a woman with a chance of her (or anyone else) never knowing about it (he would've gotten away with it and she and no one else would know about it if those bicyclists didn't ride their bike there). Her being blackout drunk and the chance of him digitally penetrating her with a chance of nobody (not even her because she's blackout) finding out made him wanna do what he did. If she didn't get drunk he wouldn't do it. According to cuck logic, it's Chanel's fault.
Yet cucks won't apply this logic to these scenarios because it's politically incorrect but this is just the special pleading fallacy. facts don't care about our emotions/feelings and facts don't care about political correctness. if we don't apply this same logic to the rape scenario we're inconsistent hypocrites with double standards.
if a woman rejects you it's her fault not yours. why? because even if your traits have to do with why she rejected you, she's the one who decides if she'll date you or not. Thus, she's the cause of whether you got rejected or not. Something being one's fault is about whether they caused it or not. Therefore, it's her fault. Same thing with the rapist because the rapist decides if you get raped or not. You aren't the one who chooses if you rejected or not (that's why it's INvoluntary celibacy not voluntary celibacy) and rape victims don't choose to be raped (being raped is involuntary or against your will). The only rape that is voluntary is statutory rape, but that's only legally rape, and what is considered statutory rape varies by country. In South Korea, consensual sex with a 19 year old is legally rape but in Italy, sex with a 14 year old isn't statutory rape (aka legally rape).
@Mainländer @Robtical @JosefMengelecel @your personality @-BrettyBoy- thoughts?
