Discussion Unpopular opinion people here judge looks way too harsh for men.

[currycell900]

I have noticed a pattern here whenever you ask someone here to rate a guy. Most people would rate a guy who would have no problem in landing dates a 6. Because muh skull muh nose. Most people dont realise foids dont even think about that stuff. For a foid any chad that triggers her ovaries by standing is enough. This forum just turns into looksmaxx fags when it comes to rating men specifically.
For foids most men are even ready to ascend with a black landwhale

 

[VanGobbel]

its .org faggotry spilling over into .is

 

[currycell900]

its .org faggotry spilling over into .is

Exactly .org is a faggot asylum

 

[yeetbender_]

They "hate" lookism just as much as the normies. They "hate" lookism but you're evil just for your phenotype and just cause you wanna taste some human foids.

 

[yeetbender_]

Lookism is popular even on here, but it's given another name and called "based."

 

[VanGobbel]

Exactly .org is a faggot asylum

they are so obsessed with male looks ranking and mogging other men, that they forget the initial reason they joined -> thinking they can improve themselves so much that they reach chad tier and get all the foids they want. Which is already deluded.

 

[Sir Silentium]

its .org faggotry spilling over into .is

Correct.
Many users migrate here from .is too, leaving a trail of faggotry.

 

[Sir Silentium]

I feel like this would be quite a popular opinion

 

[BasedGoyslopReviews]

tallfag NT can make any face work

 

[Gilgamesh]

agree, as long as you have traits that can make up for deficiencies its fine. a slightly deviated septum is going to be more than made up by a good jawline

but lets be real the reason most of us are here is because we are subhuman and have few to no traits to make up for deficiencies

 

[Rapemaxxer]

Looks rating must be objective and grounded in reality. A 6/10 is actually a pretty good rating and is roughly around 90 percentile, corresponding to HTN. People don't understand how rare cl+ men are.

 

[Rapemaxxer]

its .org faggotry spilling over into .is

Both .org and .is are downstream from OG PSL (Pslhate, sluthate, lookism). The rating system was devised and popularized on this pristine forums. Both .org and .is are inheritors of that legacy, so obviously both will retain the same system.

 

[Todd Thundercock]

Males rating other males is pointless.

Females don't think about these excessive lookist things, but that doesn't mean they're irrelevant.

I believe its as simple as binary for females. Yes or no. 0 to 1. And its determined in milliseconds before you can utter a syllable.

 

[Paladin]

I think .org and people in the looksmaxxing sphere underrate quite a lot. Especially nowadays, the amount of tiktokcels I see that think MTN is supposed to mean above average despite it having mid in the name and that underrate calling normie-tier guys sub 3s because they think it makes them so hecking blackpilled bro.

I still disagree with your idea that a guy that would have no problem in landing dates shouldn't be rating as a 6 though because that's still above average. Face ratings should be a bell curve with extremes like 2/10s and 8-9/10s being extremely rare and 0/10s and 10/10s not existing and being unobtainable extremes.

 

[ANTAGONIST]

Maybe it's to account for the extreme hypergamy of foids.