https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000557/
"Physical attractiveness has been associated with mating behavior, but its role in reproductive success of contemporary humans has received surprisingly little attention. In the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (1244 women, 997 men born between 1937 and 1940) we examined whether attractiveness assessed from photographs taken at age ~18 predicted the number of biological children at age 53–56. In women, attractiveness predicted higher reproductive success in a nonlinear fashion, so that attractive (second highest quartile) women had 16% and very attractive (highest quartile) women 6% more children than their less attractive counterparts. In men, there was a threshold effect so that men in the lowest attractiveness quartile had 13% fewer children than others who did not differ from each other in the average number of children. These associations were partly but not completely accounted for by attractive participants’ increased marriage probability. A linear regression analysis indicated relatively weak directional selection gradient for attractiveness (β=0.06 in women, β=0.07 in men). These findings indicate that physical attractiveness may be associated with reproductive success in humans living in industrialized settings."
See also my post on short men Vs. Tall men, we consistently see that there is little difference in the amount of sex between Normies and Chad's (dating apps are the exception and we know that the vast majority of people on dating apps are already in relationships and looking to monkey-branch, something which both men and toilets do). But it seems consistently clear that being unattractive as a man is a genetic and social death sentence.
Interestingly enough, Stacylites had 16% more kids than Becky's and Stacy's 6% more than Becky's, so it might seem that ugly toilets are so disgusted by themselves that many of them simply view themselves as "non-sexual creatures" (I've seen plenty of stories of toilets saying that they don't want to have sex with anyone because they find their own bodies unworthy of sex, maybe she's chubby, farts too much, has bad breath, Etc. if a toilet finds herself unattractive she often doesn't desire sex with others).
But the data clearly shows that ugly men also have less kids and less sex, and unlike toilets, men always want sex no matter how low our self-esteem is or how bad we view ourselves.
This is brutal.
I cannot stress just how fucked the ugly man is, not only do toilets desire you less but the rare ones who do get a toilet get one with a much lower libido who hates herself and sees her relationship with you as a punishment by the universe or something.
"Physical attractiveness has been associated with mating behavior, but its role in reproductive success of contemporary humans has received surprisingly little attention. In the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (1244 women, 997 men born between 1937 and 1940) we examined whether attractiveness assessed from photographs taken at age ~18 predicted the number of biological children at age 53–56. In women, attractiveness predicted higher reproductive success in a nonlinear fashion, so that attractive (second highest quartile) women had 16% and very attractive (highest quartile) women 6% more children than their less attractive counterparts. In men, there was a threshold effect so that men in the lowest attractiveness quartile had 13% fewer children than others who did not differ from each other in the average number of children. These associations were partly but not completely accounted for by attractive participants’ increased marriage probability. A linear regression analysis indicated relatively weak directional selection gradient for attractiveness (β=0.06 in women, β=0.07 in men). These findings indicate that physical attractiveness may be associated with reproductive success in humans living in industrialized settings."
See also my post on short men Vs. Tall men, we consistently see that there is little difference in the amount of sex between Normies and Chad's (dating apps are the exception and we know that the vast majority of people on dating apps are already in relationships and looking to monkey-branch, something which both men and toilets do). But it seems consistently clear that being unattractive as a man is a genetic and social death sentence.
Interestingly enough, Stacylites had 16% more kids than Becky's and Stacy's 6% more than Becky's, so it might seem that ugly toilets are so disgusted by themselves that many of them simply view themselves as "non-sexual creatures" (I've seen plenty of stories of toilets saying that they don't want to have sex with anyone because they find their own bodies unworthy of sex, maybe she's chubby, farts too much, has bad breath, Etc. if a toilet finds herself unattractive she often doesn't desire sex with others).
But the data clearly shows that ugly men also have less kids and less sex, and unlike toilets, men always want sex no matter how low our self-esteem is or how bad we view ourselves.
This is brutal.
I cannot stress just how fucked the ugly man is, not only do toilets desire you less but the rare ones who do get a toilet get one with a much lower libido who hates herself and sees her relationship with you as a punishment by the universe or something.
