JFL Typical Defense of Female Hypergamy

[SmhChan]

The defense of female hypergamy usually boils down to "muh genes." The arguments surrounding this defense are as pretentious as any reddit argument.

This in effect has the same energy as deleting a bunch of people from existence with the "defense" (excuse) of having to feed fewer mouths.

All the self-proclaimed blackpilled's inner-soy comes out with their passionate defense of female hypergamy.

 

[KillNiggers]

Genetic recombination will always make it so there are losers in life.

 

[HotDogCel]

female hypergamy is in deed eplainable by natural reasons (evolution).
Saying something is natural doesn't mean we approve it

 

[Mecoja]

If we justify things by animalistic instincts where to draw the line? Should young men kill old? Consent is a social construct, age of consent also, this points out the hypocrisy the most.

 

[AsakangaHalo]

Genetic recombination will always make it so there are losers in life.

Also, don't forget that short and ugly women could pass down their genes, still making incels.

 

[Just say NIGGER!]

Genetic recombination will always make it so there are losers in life.

 

[reveries]

So next time a foid is in trouble, I won't help her, because I don't want to interfere with nature testing her genes since genes is what she cares about the most, I'm actually helping her more this way, right? Wait, only applies to men, you say? How so? I thought there were no misandry?

 

[ilieknothing]

Just because foids like Chad doesn’t mean good genes. Most Chads I have encountered have been dumb af

 

[OmegaRicecel]

Funny thing is I don’t even care about hypergamy. What pisses me off is the foids and normies trying to gas light me into thinking it doesn’t exist and that it’s somehow my fault for bad personality or whatever the fuck

 

[lifesucksandyoudie]

Foids support eugenics but not for themselves since they're hypocrites and would never want genetically defective foids to be removed from the genepool, only men.

 

[Friezacel]

Just because foids like Chad doesn’t mean good genes. Most Chads I have encountered have been dumb af

nobody gives a shit about mih intelligence, its a meme

 

[Sewer Sloth]

If we justify things by animalistic instincts where to draw the line? Should young men kill old? Consent is a social construct, age of consent also, this points out the hypocrisy the most.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

That argument is fundamentally flawed because foids with subpar genetic material still propagate their genes.

 

[ilieknothing]

nobody gives a shit about mih intelligence, its a meme

Intelligence is good genetics and foids are not attracted to it, so foids are not attracted to good genes

 

[wereq]

I used to think this way but changed once I realized how damaging female sexuality is to the fabric of society, destroying families and reducing our resilience and coping capacity. In their quest to get chad and gigachad, hypergamous eugenicist foids end up decimating the birth rate leading to decadence, making the way for invaders who may be even genetically worse off than the men whom these foids reject, thereby making the whole thing not eugenic but rather dysgenic overall.

Eugenics which only benefits the top 10% leaving the rest to rot is not a good solution; it leads to population collapse and civilizational decay. Whatever eugenics is implemented must benefit at least 60% of the population. Also, these foids are quite dysgenic themselves because of their mental illnesses, constant pleasure seeking, and lack of pro-social sacrificial disposition. If eugenics is to be implemented it should be done uniformly even if foids are the bottleneck of population growth. Ugly or mentally/physically ill foids should not get to reproduce.