The female gender cares exclusively for three things in a man. Looks, status, money. Traits that may or may not mean the following: healthy offsprings, sexual pleasure, protection from threats such as predators or undesirable rivals, plenty of material goods.
Reasons for this are purely biological, as the statement that every organism wants to have as many offsprings that are as strong, independent and self-reliant as possible is the basis of evolutionary theory.
The reason inceldom exists is that human species are the most peculiar ones on the whole planet. I will elaborate why.
Number 1, looks. It' well-noticeable that traits women find unattractive in a man are impossible to change in a natural way. Bone structure develops once in a lifetime. It reflects what is written in the DNA. Due to that, unattractive face features and height are nearly unchangeable features of a specimen and modern medicine may help modify it, but a certain risk is present in bonesmashing, taking somatotropine or surgeries. It also costs a lot, so you sacrifice wealth, the 3rd factor, for the 1st one.
The concerning hypocrisy is revealed in the fact what most men find unattractive in girls - smoking, drinking, being obese - can all be changed. Being more tubby can result from the genes that make up the genotype of a minority of people, albeit obesity is always a result of awful diet or lack of exercise. As such, the fat acceptance movement is a vicious organisation, trying to be promote the passive attitude of women towards their solvable problems, while men are bashed for having problems that are not naturally solvable. The shaming of men shorter than 6 feet is very popular amongst women nowadays.
Number 2, status. Nowadays status is determined by how aggresive of a thug you are. The most brutal men are regarded as alphas. In reality, an alpha is somebody relentless, unwavering, perfectly stable, who solves conflicts instead of igniting them. Natural problem solvers and stable people are, however, regarded as weaklings, wimps and nerds because, for some strange reason, these traits are somehow connected with the looks of an individual by women.
This strange phenomenon leads to women being in abusive relationships and being beaten by true heartless thugs. However, strangely, the 'wimps' are still to blame for that as they are deemed dangerous 'creeps'.
Number 3, money. Money is human invention that heavily misrepresents the ability of a singular male to get his shhh together and deal with problems. Speaking from the prime tribal evolutionary standpoint, those who were able and successful in the past needed to truly exploit all their abilities so as to survive and give protection to the family. Nowadays the rich earn money only because they are visually attractive for some people to some degenerate extent. Kardashians come to mind.
tldr: the problem with our society is that women deem the most impractical traits in a male the most practical and the most dangerous men are thought to pose the least threat
This society is doomed to eventually break down as biology is truly undefeatable.
Reasons for this are purely biological, as the statement that every organism wants to have as many offsprings that are as strong, independent and self-reliant as possible is the basis of evolutionary theory.
The reason inceldom exists is that human species are the most peculiar ones on the whole planet. I will elaborate why.
Number 1, looks. It' well-noticeable that traits women find unattractive in a man are impossible to change in a natural way. Bone structure develops once in a lifetime. It reflects what is written in the DNA. Due to that, unattractive face features and height are nearly unchangeable features of a specimen and modern medicine may help modify it, but a certain risk is present in bonesmashing, taking somatotropine or surgeries. It also costs a lot, so you sacrifice wealth, the 3rd factor, for the 1st one.
The concerning hypocrisy is revealed in the fact what most men find unattractive in girls - smoking, drinking, being obese - can all be changed. Being more tubby can result from the genes that make up the genotype of a minority of people, albeit obesity is always a result of awful diet or lack of exercise. As such, the fat acceptance movement is a vicious organisation, trying to be promote the passive attitude of women towards their solvable problems, while men are bashed for having problems that are not naturally solvable. The shaming of men shorter than 6 feet is very popular amongst women nowadays.
Number 2, status. Nowadays status is determined by how aggresive of a thug you are. The most brutal men are regarded as alphas. In reality, an alpha is somebody relentless, unwavering, perfectly stable, who solves conflicts instead of igniting them. Natural problem solvers and stable people are, however, regarded as weaklings, wimps and nerds because, for some strange reason, these traits are somehow connected with the looks of an individual by women.
This strange phenomenon leads to women being in abusive relationships and being beaten by true heartless thugs. However, strangely, the 'wimps' are still to blame for that as they are deemed dangerous 'creeps'.
Number 3, money. Money is human invention that heavily misrepresents the ability of a singular male to get his shhh together and deal with problems. Speaking from the prime tribal evolutionary standpoint, those who were able and successful in the past needed to truly exploit all their abilities so as to survive and give protection to the family. Nowadays the rich earn money only because they are visually attractive for some people to some degenerate extent. Kardashians come to mind.
tldr: the problem with our society is that women deem the most impractical traits in a male the most practical and the most dangerous men are thought to pose the least threat
This society is doomed to eventually break down as biology is truly undefeatable.
