Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious True or False Incels: an analysis of the Incels.is forum [Aug 2022]

InMemoriam

InMemoriam

Secret Schizoid
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Posts
5,037
Online
61d 17h 30m
This soy ''research'' was done in august about our beloved Incels.is forum ''for some cuck's master degree JFL'' we be giving them free degrees y'all :unreal:

Seriously we need to stop giving these cucks graduation projects :feelshaha:

I actually found it accidentally on cucktear , wasn't looking for it specifically :kek: although its always interesting to read an out of group perspective,
well not in this case...


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/xba3ym/essay_analyzing_incels/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3


the thread ITself received zero attention of the subreddit :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek:

okay lets check out ''the finding'':

4 Findings​


User Centrality​


The complete network of users, as shown in Figure 1, depicts a community divided into an inner and an outer group. A large proportion of users in the network interacted with less than 3 other users over the course of the corpus. Importantly, this meant that not only is the community divided, the groups serve disparate functions. Users in the outer group are not interacting among themselves, separate from the inner community. Instead, those within the outer group concentrate around a handful of users who act as focal points along the edge of the inner community. At the same time, the inner group is largely made up of users who do primarily interact among themselves, with only the occasional interaction with members of the outer group. This separation is further emphasized by the Betweenness Centrality of user nodes. 59.15% of users in the Incel network had a Normal Betweenness Centrality of < 0.0001. Thus, a majority of users exist within the outer group, largely disconnected from the inner Incel community. Figure 4 illustrates the disparity within the inner and outer

community.
1664459493575
1664459509631

(a) < 0.001 Normal betweenness centrality (b) 0.001 Normal betweenness centrality

Figure 4: Centrality Comparison

63.55% of users have a degree of 2, indicating that they interacted with only two separate users, either by commenting on their thread or having their threads commented on. 46.33% only interacted with a single user. Furthermore, for many of these users, their edges were with the limited handful of users who act as focal points within the network. Notably, there were several sections of the outer group divisible through the specific focal-point users they interacted with. Most notably of these focal-points, were the top three users by in- bound degree and weighted in-bound degree: User 1, User 893, and User 46. In fact, these three users combined made up a significant proportion of the total weight available within the entire network. For each of these users, the question arises as to what it is exactly that places them so centrally within the greater Incel community.

User 1 was a forum moderator, thus they have several moderator-focused threads and comments. Their interactions included responding to feedback posts, discussing users’ ban appeals, or generally responding as a spokesperson of the moderator team. Much of their in- bound interactions are the results of creating large “megathreads” for these purposes. Their appearance as a focal-point of the network makes sense as a result of their role within the community and is not necessarily the result of appealing to Incel narratives and establishing themselves within the community.

That said, it is still relevant that they have formal power over the forum. As a moderator, User 1 is able to ban/unban users, hide/remove/lock6 threads, and more. They also make reference to multiple older (now banned) Incel commu- nity sites in their discussions, likely placing them as a long-term member of the community.

One of the clear ways that admin users like User 1 enact their formal authority over a community is through the development and enforcement of rules. A community’s rules can give clear insight into the values of that community and moderators inherently work to maintain a community built around those rules. Considering this and User 1’s position, it is likely that User 1 is in invested in the Incel worldview and his enforcement of the site rules works to further reinforce that worldview.
This is evident with the following excerpt from a post outlining the forum’s rules and terminology:

Incel (Allowed): Person who wishes to be in a romantic relationship, but is unable to despite numerous attempts and a significant amount of time trying.

Blackpilled (Conditional): Person who believes in / wants to learn about the Blackpill.

Female (Not Allowed): Banned on sight, no exceptions


Immediately, this establishes a community built on the exclusion and vilification of women. Furthermore, this also seeks to enforce the importance of determining “real” Incels and that the blackpill is also central to that determination. Further on in the rules, when outlining things which are not allowed: Immediately, these rules establish a community constructed on the exclusion and vilification of women. Furthermore, it establishes the importance of “real” Incels and centers the blackpill in that determination. Further on in the rules post, he outlines things which are not allowed on the forum including:

Cherry picking (e.g. unattractive men with girlfriends).

This preemptively seeks to dismiss any criticism and block attempts to go against the Incel worldview views all men disadvantaged in the “Sexual Market” (O’Malley et al., 2020).

In contrast to the formal position of power of User 1, User 46 did not appear to be a moderator and in fact was was Banned at some point before the archive was captured. Still, User 46 created popular threads that garnered large amounts of replies and remained active for much of the corpus. Their most popular thread was one titled “I will approach7 1000 girls and find a GF”:

there is no way in hell that not 1 girl in 1000 will like me I have approached 22 978 to go fellas


This thread consisted of 2,612 comments, of which 2,112 were comments created by users other than User 46. In total, 549 different users created comments in this thread over its lifespan. Based on the final comments in the thread, it was eventually closed by forum moderators, yet not before users could reminisce with comments like “I miss the glory days of this thread.” Clearly, User 46 was able to make an impact within the community and generate significant discussion. Furthermore, User 46 firmly sits within the Incel identity throughout his comment history, frequently disparaging women, boasting about catfishing8women, and frequently using homophobic and racist slurs.

At the time the archive was taken, User 46 had been banned from the forum. There was no official explanation from moderators for this ban that could be found within the corpus, though based on the discussion threads which mentioned User 46 following his ban, he was likely banned due to having success in his dating life and “finding a GF” and having sex. This presents an interesting case, as previous to his ban, User 46’s comments clearly supported the Incel normative order of the Sexual Market and the power women hold over dating (O’Malley et al., 2020). But if it is true that he was banned for being able to develop

a romantic or sexual relationship with a woman, then his personal accounts and story would serve to delegitimize the Incel worldview. This is further supported as comments discussing him after his ban from the forum often disparaged him and declared that they had always suspected he was not a real Incel.

Similar to User 46, User 893 created a popular thread which maintained activity for the entire length of the corpus. In fact, User 893 created only a single thread within the forum corpus. This specific thread was the largest thread in the Offtopic sub-forum and as such was not intended for Incel ideological discussion. Instead, this thread was intended to be a place for users to post music recommendations. It consisted of a total of 2,753 replies of which only 31 comments came from User 893. In total, 485 unique users commented on the thread over its lifespan. Also unlike User 46, this thread remained active throughout the corpus and never seemed to slow or be locked by moderators.

Even though outside of his own thread User 893 was less active than User 46, he was still very much entrenched in the Incel ideology. While his comment history is not considerably large outside of his thread, his comments placed emphasis on the Incel normative orders and traits, such as his contribution to a thread titled “Chad fails suicide via shotgun to the head. Ends up disfigured. Gets first face transplant.”:

incel does the same thing no one gives a fuck and everyone makes fun of him until he dies for real a few months later: stacy shots[sic] herself in the head for attention: millions of views on jewtube people being sorry for her can still get chad.

Thus, even though User 893’s own thread may not have been Incel-focused, he, like User 46, demonstrates that they are fully invested in the Incel worldview and the Incel normative orders (O’Malley et al., 2020). Unlike User 46, though, he was not eventually banned and remained active throughout the date range of the corpus.

As many users in the outer Incels never interact beyond the few focal-point users, those focal-point users act as an intermediary between the inner and outer Incels. Outer Incels can be split based on the specific focal-point user they interact with, but within the inner community, there is no similar disconnections. There are not any outstanding subdivisions or splits within the inner Incel community, even when considering the network spans the four separate sub-forums of the Incel forum. Still, users congregate into a singular cluster of interconnections.

Another aspect of this inner and outer community is its connection to how long users have been members of the Incel community. Figure 6 plots users’ join dates against their normal betweenness centrality with users split according to user category9. Most noteworthy is that users among those who have a normal betweenness centrality of 0.001, none of them joined the Incel forum after November 2018 10. Additionally, even among members who fell into this power user category, those with the highest centrality primarily joined the community earlier. This demonstrates the ways in which users do not immediately join the inner community but must move after some time.

This centrality was also disconnected from the number of comments a user makes, as demonstrated by Figure 6. While higher centrality members did tend to have a higher number of comments on average, there where many users who joined later who did not have high centrality. This measure placed importance on the specific of who comments on a users

Table 4: Focal-Point Users​



User 1​
User 46​
User 893​
User title​
“Admincel”​
“Banned”​
Joined month​
Nov. 2017​
Jan. 2018​
Feb. 2018​
Total messages​
1740​
3612​
3987​
Normal betweenness centrality​
0.435​
0.154​
0.286​
Degree​
1230​
609​
799​
Weighted degree (in/out)​
30480 (29995/485)​
2347 (2318/29)​
9673 (9654/19)​

thread or whose threads that user comments on instead of on merely having a large number of comments.

The emphasis on specific users’ threads further lends credence to the argument that Incels join the community on the outside, likely with less intense, less extreme ideas and slowly form connections with those already in the inner community and become further and further embedded within the inner community. Additionally, as explained previously, this further strengthens both the formal and informal authority that focal-point users have to influence the users who join the community later.

1664459977891

Figure 5: Relative Plots of Normalized Betweenness Centrality, Split By User Category

1664460014886

Figure 6: Relative Plots of Comments Included in Corpus, Split By User Category


Okay lot of blabber here, what is the take points?: TL;DR if you will.

  • basically our forum is hosting a divided and rather dysfunctional community; consisting of three individuals ''powerusers'' *CCDH report flashback* kek
representing the ''inner group''.
  • user1 : a former Admincel
  • user46
  • user893
  • the ''outer group'': what we refer to as greycels
based on identifiers made available by the author (highlighted in red) i've been able to identify two users out of the three mentioned.

1. 1/3 user 46​
@uninstall
mentioned thread: https://incels.is/threads/i-will-approach-1000-girls-and-find-a-gf.46003/

2. 2/3 user 893​
@Schizoidcel
mentioned thread: https://incels.is/threads/music-megathread.24563/


3. 3/3 user1​
unknown: help identifying who he might've been in this thread below:


possible identifiers:
From my knowledge, knajjd (former), azavii (inactive, never posts), dannymason (former, had an account here a long while back, since deleted), and Ryo_Hazuki (former).

Edit: more mods that I can remember who were 2017cels.

Blickpall, retarded_dumbshit, mental_out, gstvtrp. All gone.


1664460128219

Figure 1: Complete Incel User Network
 
Sneir

Sneir

INCELKOMMANDO INTERPOL AGENT GLASS PUSHER COPKILLA
-
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Posts
15,128
Online
63d 12h 4m
This soy ''research'' was done in august about our beloved Incels.is forum ''for some cuck's master degree JFL'' we be giving them free degrees y'all :unreal:

Seriously we need to stop giving these cucks graduation projects :feelshaha:

I actually found it accidentally on cucktear , wasn't looking for it specifically :kek: although its always interesting to read an out of group perspective,
well not in this case...


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/xba3ym/essay_analyzing_incels/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3


the thread ITself received zero attention of the subreddit :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek:

okay lets check out ''the finding'':

4 Findings​


User Centrality​


The complete network of users, as shown in Figure 1, depicts a community divided into an inner and an outer group. A large proportion of users in the network interacted with less than 3 other users over the course of the corpus. Importantly, this meant that not only is the community divided, the groups serve disparate functions. Users in the outer group are not interacting among themselves, separate from the inner community. Instead, those within the outer group concentrate around a handful of users who act as focal points along the edge of the inner community. At the same time, the inner group is largely made up of users who do primarily interact among themselves, with only the occasional interaction with members of the outer group. This separation is further emphasized by the Betweenness Centrality of user nodes. 59.15% of users in the Incel network had a Normal Betweenness Centrality of < 0.0001. Thus, a majority of users exist within the outer group, largely disconnected from the inner Incel community. Figure 4 illustrates the disparity within the inner and outer

community.
View attachment 660175 View attachment 660176
(a) < 0.001 Normal betweenness centrality (b) 0.001 Normal betweenness centrality

Figure 4: Centrality Comparison

63.55% of users have a degree of 2, indicating that they interacted with only two separate users, either by commenting on their thread or having their threads commented on. 46.33% only interacted with a single user. Furthermore, for many of these users, their edges were with the limited handful of users who act as focal points within the network. Notably, there were several sections of the outer group divisible through the specific focal-point users they interacted with. Most notably of these focal-points, were the top three users by in- bound degree and weighted in-bound degree: User 1, User 893, and User 46. In fact, these three users combined made up a significant proportion of the total weight available within the entire network. For each of these users, the question arises as to what it is exactly that places them so centrally within the greater Incel community.

User 1 was a forum moderator, thus they have several moderator-focused threads and comments. Their interactions included responding to feedback posts, discussing users’ ban appeals, or generally responding as a spokesperson of the moderator team. Much of their in- bound interactions are the results of creating large “megathreads” for these purposes. Their appearance as a focal-point of the network makes sense as a result of their role within the community and is not necessarily the result of appealing to Incel narratives and establishing themselves within the community.

That said, it is still relevant that they have formal power over the forum. As a moderator, User 1 is able to ban/unban users, hide/remove/lock6 threads, and more. They also make reference to multiple older (now banned) Incel commu- nity sites in their discussions, likely placing them as a long-term member of the community.

One of the clear ways that admin users like User 1 enact their formal authority over a community is through the development and enforcement of rules. A community’s rules can give clear insight into the values of that community and moderators inherently work to maintain a community built around those rules. Considering this and User 1’s position, it is likely that User 1 is in invested in the Incel worldview and his enforcement of the site rules works to further reinforce that worldview.
This is evident with the following excerpt from a post outlining the forum’s rules and terminology:

Incel (Allowed): Person who wishes to be in a romantic relationship, but is unable to despite numerous attempts and a significant amount of time trying.

Blackpilled (Conditional): Person who believes in / wants to learn about the Blackpill.

Female (Not Allowed): Banned on sight, no exceptions


Immediately, this establishes a community built on the exclusion and vilification of women. Furthermore, this also seeks to enforce the importance of determining “real” Incels and that the blackpill is also central to that determination. Further on in the rules, when outlining things which are not allowed: Immediately, these rules establish a community constructed on the exclusion and vilification of women. Furthermore, it establishes the importance of “real” Incels and centers the blackpill in that determination. Further on in the rules post, he outlines things which are not allowed on the forum including:

Cherry picking (e.g. unattractive men with girlfriends).

This preemptively seeks to dismiss any criticism and block attempts to go against the Incel worldview views all men disadvantaged in the “Sexual Market” (O’Malley et al., 2020).

In contrast to the formal position of power of User 1, User 46 did not appear to be a moderator and in fact was was Banned at some point before the archive was captured. Still, User 46 created popular threads that garnered large amounts of replies and remained active for much of the corpus. Their most popular thread was one titled “I will approach7 1000 girls and find a GF”:

there is no way in hell that not 1 girl in 1000 will like me I have approached 22 978 to go fellas


This thread consisted of 2,612 comments, of which 2,112 were comments created by users other than User 46. In total, 549 different users created comments in this thread over its lifespan. Based on the final comments in the thread, it was eventually closed by forum moderators, yet not before users could reminisce with comments like “I miss the glory days of this thread.” Clearly, User 46 was able to make an impact within the community and generate significant discussion. Furthermore, User 46 firmly sits within the Incel identity throughout his comment history, frequently disparaging women, boasting about catfishing8women, and frequently using homophobic and racist slurs.

At the time the archive was taken, User 46 had been banned from the forum. There was no official explanation from moderators for this ban that could be found within the corpus, though based on the discussion threads which mentioned User 46 following his ban, he was likely banned due to having success in his dating life and “finding a GF” and having sex. This presents an interesting case, as previous to his ban, User 46’s comments clearly supported the Incel normative order of the Sexual Market and the power women hold over dating (O’Malley et al., 2020). But if it is true that he was banned for being able to develop

a romantic or sexual relationship with a woman, then his personal accounts and story would serve to delegitimize the Incel worldview. This is further supported as comments discussing him after his ban from the forum often disparaged him and declared that they had always suspected he was not a real Incel.

Similar to User 46, User 893 created a popular thread which maintained activity for the entire length of the corpus. In fact, User 893 created only a single thread within the forum corpus. This specific thread was the largest thread in the Offtopic sub-forum and as such was not intended for Incel ideological discussion. Instead, this thread was intended to be a place for users to post music recommendations. It consisted of a total of 2,753 replies of which only 31 comments came from User 893. In total, 485 unique users commented on the thread over its lifespan. Also unlike User 46, this thread remained active throughout the corpus and never seemed to slow or be locked by moderators.

Even though outside of his own thread User 893 was less active than User 46, he was still very much entrenched in the Incel ideology. While his comment history is not considerably large outside of his thread, his comments placed emphasis on the Incel normative orders and traits, such as his contribution to a thread titled “Chad fails suicide via shotgun to the head. Ends up disfigured. Gets first face transplant.”:

incel does the same thing no one gives a fuck and everyone makes fun of him until he dies for real a few months later: stacy shots[sic] herself in the head for attention: millions of views on jewtube people being sorry for her can still get chad.

Thus, even though User 893’s own thread may not have been Incel-focused, he, like User 46, demonstrates that they are fully invested in the Incel worldview and the Incel normative orders (O’Malley et al., 2020). Unlike User 46, though, he was not eventually banned and remained active throughout the date range of the corpus.

As many users in the outer Incels never interact beyond the few focal-point users, those focal-point users act as an intermediary between the inner and outer Incels. Outer Incels can be split based on the specific focal-point user they interact with, but within the inner community, there is no similar disconnections. There are not any outstanding subdivisions or splits within the inner Incel community, even when considering the network spans the four separate sub-forums of the Incel forum. Still, users congregate into a singular cluster of interconnections.

Another aspect of this inner and outer community is its connection to how long users have been members of the Incel community. Figure 6 plots users’ join dates against their normal betweenness centrality with users split according to user category9. Most noteworthy is that users among those who have a normal betweenness centrality of 0.001, none of them joined the Incel forum after November 2018 10. Additionally, even among members who fell into this power user category, those with the highest centrality primarily joined the community earlier. This demonstrates the ways in which users do not immediately join the inner community but must move after some time.

This centrality was also disconnected from the number of comments a user makes, as demonstrated by Figure 6. While higher centrality members did tend to have a higher number of comments on average, there where many users who joined later who did not have high centrality. This measure placed importance on the specific of who comments on a users

Table 4: Focal-Point Users​



User 1​
User 46​
User 893​
User title​
“Admincel”​
“Banned”​
Joined month​
Nov. 2017​
Jan. 2018​
Feb. 2018​
Total messages​
1740​
3612​
3987​
Normal betweenness centrality​
0.435​
0.154​
0.286​
Degree​
1230​
609​
799​
Weighted degree (in/out)​
30480 (29995/485)​
2347 (2318/29)​
9673 (9654/19)​

thread or whose threads that user comments on instead of on merely having a large number of comments.

The emphasis on specific users’ threads further lends credence to the argument that Incels join the community on the outside, likely with less intense, less extreme ideas and slowly form connections with those already in the inner community and become further and further embedded within the inner community. Additionally, as explained previously, this further strengthens both the formal and informal authority that focal-point users have to influence the users who join the community later.

View attachment 660178
Figure 5: Relative Plots of Normalized Betweenness Centrality, Split By User Category

View attachment 660179
Figure 6: Relative Plots of Comments Included in Corpus, Split By User Category


Okay lot of blabber here, what is the take points?: TL;DR if you will.

  • basically our forum is hosting a divided and rather dysfunctional community; consisting of three individuals ''powerusers'' *CCDH report flashback* kek
representing the ''inner group''.
  • user1 : a former Admincel
  • user46
  • user893
  • the ''outer group'': what we refer to as greycels
based on identifiers made available by the author (highlighted in red) i've been able to identify two users out of the three mentioned.

1. 1/3 user 46​
@uninstall
mentioned thread: https://incels.is/threads/i-will-approach-1000-girls-and-find-a-gf.46003/

2. 2/3 user 893​
@Schizoidcel
mentioned thread: https://incels.is/threads/music-megathread.24563/


3. 3/3 user1​
unknown: help identifying who he might've been in this thread below:


possible identifiers:



View attachment 660181
Figure 1: Complete Incel User Network

MEDS MEDS MEDS NOW NOW NOW!!!!!!!!! (IN VIDEO GAME)
 
W

wastedTime

Officer
★★
Joined
Mar 5, 2021
Posts
602
Online
11d 10h 24m
sounds retarded and pointless
 
decembrist_kirillov

decembrist_kirillov

coping till death
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 12, 2021
Posts
17,621
Online
46d 3h 41m
they are doing it those researches just for doing it.
 
wgm24

wgm24

This Thing of Ours
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 29, 2021
Posts
1,903
Online
26d 10h 57m
Jesus Christ. They really find us interesting
 
My Name Jeff

My Name Jeff

look here look listen
★★
Joined
Jul 18, 2022
Posts
1,634
Online
6d 23h 23m
In the alleyway, a full moon, a light fog, the cold dusk air of this vile city fills my lungs as I take a deep breath.

My hand, wrapped around the length of this penis I call my own, her voice screams no but the voices in my head scream yes...


And that concludes this days short story, tune in next week for more Tales from the Basement
 
Mecoja

Mecoja

stompin on a dream
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 28, 2020
Posts
23,381
Online
268d 18h 3m
Imo forum is divided on Sewers, Chat, ID, Direct messaging groups.

When you see each one of these sections are usually made threads by/commented by no more than 10 same guys, except direct messaging which are formed by cliques, usually older members.
 
InMemoriam

InMemoriam

Secret Schizoid
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Posts
5,037
Online
61d 17h 30m
@The Enforcer you said to tag you when posted so here it goes:feelsokman:
 
InMemoriam

InMemoriam

Secret Schizoid
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Posts
5,037
Online
61d 17h 30m
Imo forum is divided on Sewers, Chat, ID, Direct messaging groups.

When you see each one of these sections are usually made threads by/commented by no more than 10 same guys, except direct messaging which are formed by cliques, usually older members.
yeah of all researches this one seems to hold true :feelsaww:
 
The Enforcer

The Enforcer

Not fit to survive
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 25, 2021
Posts
2,399
Online
46d 15h 52m
@The Enforcer you said to tag you when posted so here it goes:feelsokman:
based for tag tbh. Turns out i've actually seen this jfl. Just lol as fuck at the threads attention though. 1 comment, 1 updoot. Just seems like a bare "analysis" tbh. JFL did he make those graphs in Gephi or someshit?
 
subhuman

subhuman

Born to die. Forced to live.
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 9, 2022
Posts
9,301
Online
69d 2h 4m
This guys data analysis isn’t very good tbh
 
InMemoriam

InMemoriam

Secret Schizoid
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Posts
5,037
Online
61d 17h 30m
This guys data analysis isn’t very good tbh
I bet he's an IT cuck who figured a useful way to spend his time lurking the incels forum :feelsgah:
 
InMemoriam

InMemoriam

Secret Schizoid
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Posts
5,037
Online
61d 17h 30m
Turns out i've actually seen this jfl.
i don't usually hang on IT, it was rare ''accidental'' find jfl :feelsPop:
most of other researches done on incels are quite dull and repetitive too tbh
 
subhuman

subhuman

Born to die. Forced to live.
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 9, 2022
Posts
9,301
Online
69d 2h 4m
I bet he's an IT cuck who figured a useful way to spend his time lurking the incels forum :feelsgah:
I liked the ccdh one about power users better. It was kinda cool how they made an incel hall of fame.
 
InMemoriam

InMemoriam

Secret Schizoid
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Posts
5,037
Online
61d 17h 30m
I liked the ccdh one about power users better. It was kinda cool how they made an incel hall of fame.
still waiting for the incels hall of shame edition
 
The Enforcer

The Enforcer

Not fit to survive
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 25, 2021
Posts
2,399
Online
46d 15h 52m
i don't usually hang on IT, it was rare ''accidental'' find jfl :feelsPop:
most of other researches done on incels are quite dull and repetitive too tbh
IT tier shit
 
Kami

Kami

swagpilled
Joined
Aug 15, 2022
Posts
3,040
Online
17d 2h 8m
didn't read but you can't deny most the people on here are fakecels. just look at any single poll that gets made.
 
Goosecel

Goosecel

Kmaxxer
★★★★
Joined
Sep 12, 2022
Posts
378
Online
4d 10h 39m
Lmfao imagine money to study us jfl
 
Schizoidcel

Schizoidcel

     
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 11, 2018
Posts
4,498
Online
21d 33m
They're still writing whole theses on my low IQ drunk posts from years ago? Jesus Christ. Shouldn't they be paying us at this point for giving them so much content? :feelshaha: My username has been mentioned in two .pdf's that I know of now, what could be the reason they're so attracted to me? :feelswhat:

I was the original thread starter of the "Music" thread in off-topic by the way, nice to see it's still up :feelsaww:. I'm not so much active nowadays.
 
Last edited:
Kami

Kami

swagpilled
Joined
Aug 15, 2022
Posts
3,040
Online
17d 2h 8m
Lmfao imagine money to study us jfl
germany is doing the same thing but just for whites/males. My taxes fund research that tells me why I'm evil
 
Schizoidcel

Schizoidcel

     
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 11, 2018
Posts
4,498
Online
21d 33m
My username has been mentioned in two .pdf's that I know of now, what could be the reason they're so attracted to me? :feelswhat:
After reading the whole .pdf , it seems they assume I'm a "power user" or some kind of mastermind because I made a thread in off-topic (Music mega-thread, before some admin account stole the ownership) that got a lot of replies and included many different usernames over a couple years. JFL, have they ever used an anonymous forum before?

They must have been really disappointed looking for edgy violent quotes trudging through my post history :feelsPop:
 
Last edited:
InMemoriam

InMemoriam

Secret Schizoid
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Posts
5,037
Online
61d 17h 30m
After reading the whole .pdf , it seems they assume I'm a "power user" because I made a thread in off-topic (Music mega-thread, before some admin account stole the ownership) that got a lot of replies and included many different usernames over a couple years. JFL.
They must have been really disappointed looking for edgy violent quotes trudging through my post history :feelsPop:
:feelshaha:
 
LeFrenchCel

LeFrenchCel

My postcount = your oneitis' bodycount
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Posts
8,462
Online
66d 6h 58m
Too long + IT = retarded
 
InMemoriam

InMemoriam

Secret Schizoid
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Posts
5,037
Online
61d 17h 30m
@Schizoidcel btw are you a real schizoid like me:feelsrope:
 
Master

Master

Modcel
★★★★★
Joined
May 1, 2022
Posts
209
Online
27d 5h 26m
Serge has to be user one as he was one that installed the forum, so he has to be user 1.
 
InMemoriam

InMemoriam

Secret Schizoid
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Posts
5,037
Online
61d 17h 30m
Serge has to be user one as he was one that installed the forum, so he has to be user 1.
i thought the same at first but the numbers are randomly assigned tho, not corresponding with their respective forum ID
 
Noseman

Noseman

KHHV Scandicel and spergoloid outsider
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 9, 2022
Posts
2,792
Online
5d 1h 47m
Were a new species and they want to discover
 
AsgardTheFatcel

AsgardTheFatcel

humblecel. evolutionary scientist.
★★★★★
Joined
Mar 25, 2022
Posts
3,496
Online
15d 18h 41m
Were a new species and they want to discover
They will finally find it out once we send them straight to Emergency Room
 
Noseman

Noseman

KHHV Scandicel and spergoloid outsider
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 9, 2022
Posts
2,792
Online
5d 1h 47m
They will finally find it out once we send them straight to Emergency Room
Im not so into the idea of that as im not a violent man, Howewer i do believe there is injustice in this trucel hating paradise of a soyciety
 
Sigma

Sigma

Envious of asexual organisms
★★★★★
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Posts
1,415
Online
27d 15h 49m
My taxes fund research that tells me why I'm evil
An irrefutable reason to drop out and be as destructive and socially disruptive as possible
Governments have completely turned on men
 

Similar threads

ResidentHell
Replies
38
Views
609
TheDarkEnigma
TheDarkEnigma
InMemoriam
Replies
8
Views
763
Sennacherib
Sennacherib
InMemoriam
Replies
14
Views
374
NirvanaFan1988
NirvanaFan1988
InMemoriam
Replies
27
Views
2K
Hubert
Hubert
AsiaCel
Replies
11
Views
441
Fat Link
Fat Link
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top