N
Indo-European migrations - Wikipedia
Ice Age Europeans =/= modern Europeans. Unless you were exclusively talking about Basques.
Find another cope.
Ice Age Europeans =/= modern Europeans. Unless you were exclusively talking about Basques.
Find another cope.
D
Eastern Europeans like Russians, behave like low IQ savages. Mayans and Aztecs built an amazing civilization that studied the stars. The Egyptians built one of the best civilizations in history as well.
Look at this map showing the distribution of IQs by geographic region. Eskimos are higher IQ than the Aztecs and Mayans. It just proves my point.
The Eskimos IQ mogged the Aztecs and the Mayans.
In colder climates you need intelligence mostly to survive. Among that you need to be reliable and also have higher trust. All nordic countries are these nice welfare countries and the system is built on trust, which makes sense. If you couldn't cooperate with others you would have to survive the winters alone. Its probably not a coincidence that the most 'successful' welfare states all reside in Northern Europe
So you agree with my thesis?
5 points of iq isnt a mog also eskimos are poor as shit no civilization at all and they rely on white people to exist consideratimg the huge alcoholism and suicide problems eskimos have
Your theory is crap
The Eskimos dont have much of a civilization because it's hard to have a technological civilization when all there is around you is snow, ice, fish, and seals.
But Eskimos are the highest IQ Native American group.
Last edited:
The trend of higher IQ in areas farther from the equator is so strong that you have to be a retard to deny it.
That's another way of putting it.
White people mog the fuck out of Native Americans.
White people conquered the Native Americans, not the other way around. Do you know why Native Americans didn't go to Europe and conquer Europe to make the Native Americans rich with all the resources in Europe? The Native Americans didn't have the brains or work ethic to make a civilization that could cross the Atlantic Ocean and conquer another continent!
B
There's certainly appears to be a correlation between IQ and habitation zone that indicates what your thesis purports, and the argument that harsher climates require greater forethought and problem-solving ability than more pleasant climates is valid.
Others can call this a cope all they like, but - barring any other significant factors and data - you're correct here.
The counter-argument that many civilizations, which were advanced and/or the pinnacle, did not originate from regions with winters that required planning and preparation also does have merit. What do you say to this?
Others can call this a cope all they like, but - barring any other significant factors and data - you're correct here.
The counter-argument that many civilizations, which were advanced and/or the pinnacle, did not originate from regions with winters that required planning and preparation also does have merit. What do you say to this?
Exactly I hate this shit.
I suppose that you would consider Ancient Mesopotamia, Ancient Rome, Ancient Greece, and Ancient Egypt as examples for your counter-argument.
I would say to that it is where the ancestors of the people in those four ancient civilizations were in the last ice age that matters, and how those climates compared to the climates in sub saharan Africa and central America and Australia in the last ice age that counts the most. I presume the land in what is now present day Iran and Egypt were still a lot colder than the equatorial areas I mentioned during the last ice age.
Didn’t read. We separate races like this here
You’re either white or ethnic
You’re either white or ethnic
Tropical person cope
B
Is there sufficient evidence for this to show that such differences in temperature resulted in the kind of harsh winters which would have warranted the need for planning, which would have then indicated a selection preference for higher intelligence?
means nothing when they have done shit never and right know they are plagued with suicide and alcoholism and this is with white people bailing them if eskimos had their own nation it would be a shithole
what's the point. they mog me everyday.
You forgot south east asians. Malays and other SEAs are known for being indolent and stupid.
And its not the need to build shelter and store food (as a result of the cold climate) that differentiates Eurasians from tropical people. It was the lack of resources (because of the cold climate) that put survival and competition with other humans on overdrive. The need to compete and kill other human competitors put evolution on overdrive.
The reason why Eurasians have better political development relative to tropical people is because their ancestors were better at war than the ancestors of tropical people. And after these Eurasian people developed civilization, political development and organization was just one of their ways of expressing the martial nature of their pre-history ancestors. Political development and organization in the modern era is fundamentally necessary for war.
And its not the need to build shelter and store food (as a result of the cold climate) that differentiates Eurasians from tropical people. It was the lack of resources (because of the cold climate) that put survival and competition with other humans on overdrive. The need to compete and kill other human competitors put evolution on overdrive.
The reason why Eurasians have better political development relative to tropical people is because their ancestors were better at war than the ancestors of tropical people. And after these Eurasian people developed civilization, political development and organization was just one of their ways of expressing the martial nature of their pre-history ancestors. Political development and organization in the modern era is fundamentally necessary for war.
Last edited:
Yes. The sun's rays were/are more concentrated when they hit the Earth in regions nearer the equator such as sub-Saharan Africa and Central America than the rays were/are in the regions that are now Iran and Egypt. This would make the climate substantially warmer in Sub-Saharan Africa and Central America than in the regions that are now Iran and Egypt.
B
That's not quite what I'm asking. Sorry, if I misspoke. I'm aware of how the angle of the sun's rays affect the seasons in different parts of the world. I was moreso asking if there is sufficient evidence to show if there are other places in the world that didn't have the selection pressures of winter, yet still showed similar selection pressures that would have resulted in the kind of civilizations we see from regions with no winter but should also expect from the winter regions.
a
I'm aware of GROUPS (OR ETHNICITIES) OF PEOPLE that lived near the equator for millenia that still showed SOME selection pressure to raise IQ, but the selection pressure did not happen when the GROUPS OF PEOPLE lived near the equator. The Southeast Asians live comparably close to the equator to sub-Saharan Africans, yet the Southeast Asians are higher IQ and have a more advanced civilization than sub-Saharan Africans. The Southeast Asians invented a written language. Sub-Saharan Africans never invented a written language. Why? Because the ancestors of Southeast Asians lived in Europe for millenia before they immigrated to Southeast Asia. The IQ of Southeast Asians has been elevated due to the time that the ancestors of Southeast Asians lived in Europe, but the IQ of Southeast Asians is still below the IQ of white people because the ancestors of white people lived in an arctic climate for far longer than the ancestors of Southeast Asians.
By the way, there are other selection pressures that can raise IQ unrelated to geographic region. Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQs of any ethnic group in the world by far, but it's unrelated to place. Jews evolved high IQ due to two reasons, both related to anti-semitism. 1# Jews were basically forbidden to do certain jobs such as farming, which limited them to occupations that require higher IQ to survive and 2# Jews were so abused throughout history that only the intelligent jews were able to survive.
I'm not aware of any PLACE in the world near the equator (so they didn't have the selection pressures of winter) that still showed selection pressure to raise IQ substantially. In other words, I'm not aware of any place near the equator that showed the selection pressure WHILE THE PEOPLE WERE IN THAT PLACE.
I'm aware of GROUPS (OR ETHNICITIES) OF PEOPLE that lived near the equator for millenia that still showed SOME selection pressure to raise IQ, but the selection pressure did not happen when the GROUPS OF PEOPLE lived near the equator. The Southeast Asians live comparably close to the equator to sub-Saharan Africans, yet the Southeast Asians are higher IQ and have a more advanced civilization than sub-Saharan Africans. The Southeast Asians invented a written language. Sub-Saharan Africans never invented a written language. Why? Because the ancestors of Southeast Asians lived in Europe for millenia before they immigrated to Southeast Asia. The IQ of Southeast Asians has been elevated due to the time that the ancestors of Southeast Asians lived in Europe, but the IQ of Southeast Asians is still below the IQ of white people because the ancestors of white people lived in an arctic climate for far longer than the ancestors of Southeast Asians.
By the way, there are other selection pressures that can raise IQ unrelated to geographic region. Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQs of any ethnic group in the world by far, but it's unrelated to place. Jews evolved high IQ due to two reasons, both related to anti-semitism. 1# Jews were basically forbidden to do certain jobs such as farming, which limited them to occupations that require higher IQ to survive and 2# Jews were so abused throughout history that only the intelligent jews were able to survive.
Last edited:
B
The superior Jewish Ashkenazi IQ is a myth. They're no smarter than Europeans on average.
Huh .. I didn't know this. When I started digging I saw some citations to studies about 40-50 years ago showing their IQ is actually lower ... but it's all flagged up in Wikipedia et al. Shrug.
I don't know about the whole IQ thing anyway.
bullshit
B
They're certainly overrepresented in domains and vocations that intellectually driven, but as far as IQ goes, they're nowhere near what's purported in common media. I had a post here from a couple of years ago that had the source. I'll look for it later.
People in pre-historic times worked cooperatively in groups of dozens of people to hunt and do other tasks. There was no need to kill other human competitors.
Ftfy
Have you seen what chimps do to other chimps or should I post some chimpanzee gore.
Or the cannibals in sub saharan africa or papua new guinea.
It does look up cold winter theory. There’s a reason East Asians who descended from ancient siberians samoyeds have the highest iq.
There’s claims that every single group in humanity besides spainards found the Americas first.
Yea it’s more nuanced than that. Plus most Europeans descend from Yamnaya IE who originated in the Pontic Caspian steppe. First civilization in med Greece were Minoans who were EEF. But you have good points also true about mesoamericans vs Eskimos. But to be fair the cold climate in the arctic circle where the Eskimos live is fucking insane.
Bumped for PLA1092
Do you agree with my thesis?
Well, Eskimo IQ is higher than the IQ of all the other Native Americans. So I don't see why so many people think Eskimos are a knock against my thesis.
I believe the Natives who are descendants of people of northern Ontario, Alberta are higher IQ than natives descended from people who lived in the southern part of those provinces.
I've heard this idea expressed on Stormfront as well. Makes perfect sense. My only problem is, what about the Inuit and other american natives up further north? They still shared plenty in common with those in the south. In fact, they were arguably even less competent. At least the natives in Mexico could create empires like the Mayans and Aztecs. There were only tribes up north.
Last edited:
do you think they iqmog Italians/persians/indians
I said people, not chimps.
Those are tropical people. So it doesn't refute my thesis
Historically, both the tropical/equatorial peoples and the big latitude peoples didn't develop much whereas people around parallel 30-40 developed a ton.
The Eskimos IQ mog the Mayans and Aztecs. There were a lot more people in Mexico/Central America than in the arctic regions of North America. The arctic regions where the Eskimos lived is/was *VERY* sparsely populated. It takes a lot of people to make well-developed civilization.
The ancestors of the people around parallel 30-40 lived in arctic regions during the last Ice Age.
The Italians IQ mog the Eskimos. All white groups of people IQ mog the Eskimos.
The Eskimos are comparable in IQ to Persians and Indians.
Why didn't they populate faster, then? The cold European climate didn't stop whites. Due to how the first migrations happened, the north american natives would've had a head start. Maybe not the inuit, but the ones from the plains and Canada could've done so easily.
Last edited:
There was not much food available in the arctic regions for prehistoric people. The population would not get any bigger than the maximum amount of people that the food in an arctic region could sustain.
The regions were the Eskimos lived had less food per square mile than Europe.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
