Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Tropical people vs. Arctic people

unique_freak

unique_freak

43 years old and lifetime dateless
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 4, 2022
Posts
1,486
I have noticed that people descended from tropical people are similar to other people descended from tropical people all over the world, no matter how far they live from each other. People descended from Arctic people are similar to other people descended from arctic people the world over.

The best examples of tropical people are Sub-Saharan Africans, Australian Aborigines, and mestizos from the areas around Mexico and Central America. These gorups of tropical people all have great similarities with other groups of tropical people, even though they are oceans apart from each other. Tropical people are lazy, stupid, and violent. Sub-Saharan Africans have an average IQ of approximately 70. The average IQ among Australian aborigines is approximately 60. Mestizos from Central American and Mexico have average IQs of around 85.

The most prominent examples of arctic people are Europeans and North Asians, such as Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans. Arctic people are intelligent, hard-working , and less prone to violence. The average IQ of Europeans is 100. The average IQ of North Asians such as Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans is around 103.

Why are tropical people so similar to other tropical people, even though they are far removed from them geographically? Why are Europeans similar to North Asians, despite the fact that they live thousands of miles from each other? Arctic climates selected for the same traits worldwide during the last ice age. Tropical climates also selected for the same traits.


In Europe and North Asia, people had to plan ahead and construct water-proof well-insulated houses to survive the winter in the last ice age. They also had to stock their houses with plenty of firewood and food. Any Europeans or North Asians who waited until winter came to start building their houses would perish and not pass on their genes. Europeans and North Asians who had the foresight to construct waterproof, well insulated houses survived and passed on their genes to another generation of Europeans and North Asians. This selected for several traits among Europeans and North Asians. It selected for intelligence, but it also selected for a stout work ethic and socially cohesive behavior. In Europe and North Asia, people had to work hard at building houses and stockpiling enough firewood and food to last for months. This made it so that hard working Europeans and North Asians would survive and pass on their genes for a stout work ethic. Lazy Europeans and lazy North Asians would perish in the winter and not pass on their genes. Furthermore, all these extra tasks of needing to construct houses and stock them with firewood and food required Europeans and North Asians to need to work together a lot, and, thus, fostered a tendency towards socially cohesive behavior (morality) that tropical people did not have.

In Tropical climates, the ice age was a lot milder because people were closer to the equator. People did not have to construct any houses at all to survive the winter. The only thing people in tropical climates had to do to survive was to be able to walk over to a banana tree and pick a banana off the tree and eat it. Then they had to have enough gumption to be able to squat later and defecate. That's it. So people did not need much of a work ethic to survive in tropical climates.
 
5 paragraphs of cope
 
You mean artic people are superior? Are you an eskimo supremacist? Because europeans and north asians dont live on artic weather
 
I have noticed that people descended from tropical people are similar to other people descended from tropical people all over the world, no matter how far they live from each other. People descended from Arctic people are similar to other people descended from arctic people the world over.

The best examples of tropical people are Sub-Saharan Africans, Australian Aborigines, and mestizos from the areas around Mexico and Central America. These gorups of tropical people all have great similarities with other groups of tropical people, even though they are oceans apart from each other. Tropical people are lazy, stupid, and violent. Sub-Saharan Africans have an average IQ of approximately 70. The average IQ among Australian aborigines is approximately 60. Mestizos from Central American and Mexico have average IQs of around 85.

The most prominent examples of arctic people are Europeans and North Asians, such as Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans. Arctic people are intelligent, hard-working , and less prone to violence. The average IQ of Europeans is 100. The average IQ of North Asians such as Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans is around 103.

Why are tropical people so similar to other tropical people, even though they are far removed from them geographically? Why are Europeans similar to North Asians, despite the fact that they live thousands of miles from each other? Arctic climates selected for the same traits worldwide during the last ice age. Tropical climates also selected for the same traits.


In Europe and North Asia, people had to plan ahead and construct water-proof well-insulated houses to survive the winter in the last ice age. They also had to stock their houses with plenty of firewood and food. Any Europeans or North Asians who waited until winter came to start building their houses would perish and not pass on their genes. Europeans and North Asians who had the foresight to construct waterproof, well insulated houses survived and passed on their genes to another generation of Europeans and North Asians. This selected for several traits among Europeans and North Asians. It selected for intelligence, but it also selected for a stout work ethic and socially cohesive behavior. In Europe and North Asia, people had to work hard at building houses and stockpiling enough firewood and food to last for months. This made it so that hard working Europeans and North Asians would survive and pass on their genes for a stout work ethic. Lazy Europeans and lazy North Asians would perish in the winter and not pass on their genes. Furthermore, all these extra tasks of needing to construct houses and stock them with firewood and food required Europeans and North Asians to need to work together a lot, and, thus, fostered a tendency towards socially cohesive behavior (morality) that tropical people did not have.

In Tropical climates, the ice age was a lot milder because people were closer to the equator. People did not have to construct any houses at all to survive the winter. The only thing people in tropical climates had to do to survive was to be able to walk over to a banana tree and pick a banana off the tree and eat it. Then they had to have enough gumption to be able to squat later and defecate. That's it. So people did not need much of a work ethic to survive in tropical climates.
How will this get me laid or finally give me the strength to kill myself or get myself free of caring about the necessities of this bullshit world?
 
How will this get me laid or finally give me the strength to kill myself or get myself free of caring about the necessities of this bullshit world?

It won't. It is not my responsibility to get you laid or give you the strength to kill yourself. This is the lounge. It's for OFF TOPIC threads not about incel.
 
Last edited:
You mean artic people are superior? Are you an eskimo supremacist? Because europeans and north asians dont live on artic weather

Parts of Scandanavia and North Asia are within the arctic circle. But I mostly used the term arctic people to distinguish whites and North Asians from tropical people. I like arctic people vs. Tropical people more than tropical people vs non-tropical people. You are just nitpicking.

Furthermore, Europe and North Asia had an arctic climate during the last ice age. Sub-Saharan Africa did not.

Tropical people can generally jump higher and sprint faster than arctic people. So am I saying that tropical people are superior?

About 90% of the NBA players are tropical people. Why don't more arctic people play in the NBA and make millions of dollars? Tropical people tend to be better basketball players than arctic people
 
Last edited:
Mangos are pretty good
 
I am South Asian and lazy, so OP is right
 
Eskimos tend to be higher IQ than the average mestizo who is descended from people who lived in Mexico, Central America, and South America.
 
I am South Asian and lazy, so OP is right

South Asians tend to be lazy and low IQ. Vietnam, Cambodia, and India are turd world countries.

Japan and China and Hong Kong are first world countries populated by high IQ people.

Japan mogs the fuck out of Vietnam.
 
eskimos are retards so i'm not bought on the hypothesis that colder climates encourages intelligence
 
Parts of Scandanavia and North Asia are within the arctic circle. But I mostly used the term arctic people to distinguish whites and North Asians from tropical people. I like arctic people vs. Tropical people more than tropical people vs non-tropical people. You are just nitpicking.

Furthermore, Europe and North Asia had an arctic climate during the last ice age. Sub-Saharan Africa did not.

Tropical people can generally jump higher and sprint faster than arctic people. So am I saying that tropical people are superior?

About 90% of the NBA players are tropical people. Why don't more arctic people play in the NBA and make millions of dollars? Tropical people tend to be better basketball players than arctic people
The people on the artic that lives in scandinavia amd nort asia are stone age eskimos samiis and siberians and they arent particurally smart of anything the parts of scandinavia and north asia where the people you suck off live is on temperate weather.
Second the people that lived in europe during the ice age is extinct their contrinution to european dna today is almost 0 modern day europeans descend from groups that didnt face the harsh conditions of the ice age, on north asia they do a bit but japanese and chinase descend mainly from people that came from warmer areas
 
I have noticed that people descended from tropical people are similar to other people descended from tropical people all over the world, no matter how far they live from each other. People descended from Arctic people are similar to other people descended from arctic people the world over.

The best examples of tropical people are Sub-Saharan Africans, Australian Aborigines, and mestizos from the areas around Mexico and Central America. These gorups of tropical people all have great similarities with other groups of tropical people, even though they are oceans apart from each other. Tropical people are lazy, stupid, and violent. Sub-Saharan Africans have an average IQ of approximately 70. The average IQ among Australian aborigines is approximately 60. Mestizos from Central American and Mexico have average IQs of around 85.

The most prominent examples of arctic people are Europeans and North Asians, such as Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans. Arctic people are intelligent, hard-working , and less prone to violence. The average IQ of Europeans is 100. The average IQ of North Asians such as Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans is around 103.

Why are tropical people so similar to other tropical people, even though they are far removed from them geographically? Why are Europeans similar to North Asians, despite the fact that they live thousands of miles from each other? Arctic climates selected for the same traits worldwide during the last ice age. Tropical climates also selected for the same traits.


In Europe and North Asia, people had to plan ahead and construct water-proof well-insulated houses to survive the winter in the last ice age. They also had to stock their houses with plenty of firewood and food. Any Europeans or North Asians who waited until winter came to start building their houses would perish and not pass on their genes. Europeans and North Asians who had the foresight to construct waterproof, well insulated houses survived and passed on their genes to another generation of Europeans and North Asians. This selected for several traits among Europeans and North Asians. It selected for intelligence, but it also selected for a stout work ethic and socially cohesive behavior. In Europe and North Asia, people had to work hard at building houses and stockpiling enough firewood and food to last for months. This made it so that hard working Europeans and North Asians would survive and pass on their genes for a stout work ethic. Lazy Europeans and lazy North Asians would perish in the winter and not pass on their genes. Furthermore, all these extra tasks of needing to construct houses and stock them with firewood and food required Europeans and North Asians to need to work together a lot, and, thus, fostered a tendency towards socially cohesive behavior (morality) that tropical people did not have.

In Tropical climates, the ice age was a lot milder because people were closer to the equator. People did not have to construct any houses at all to survive the winter. The only thing people in tropical climates had to do to survive was to be able to walk over to a banana tree and pick a banana off the tree and eat it. Then they had to have enough gumption to be able to squat later and defecate. That's it. So people did not need much of a work ethic to survive in tropical climates.
That doesn’t explain why all the ancient civilizations were around a similar latitude of Egypt, Greece, Mesopotamia, Persia, Indus Valley, and Yellow River. The tropical and arctic people were both raping and pillaging then.
 
eskimos are retards so i'm not bought on the hypothesis that colder climates encourages intelligence
Eskimos have higher IQ than all other groups of mestizos and Native Americans.

Average Eskimo IQ:90

Average overall Native American IQ: 85
 
Last edited:
That doesn’t explain why all the ancient civilizations were around a similar latitude of Egypt, Greece, Mesopotamia, Persia, Indus Valley, and Yellow River. The tropical and arctic people were both raping and pillaging then.

The ancestors of Ancient Greeks, Mesopotamians, and Persians all lived in arctic Europe during the last ice age.
 
The ancestors of Ancient Greeks, Mesopotamians, and Persians all lived in arctic Europe during the last ice age.
Cope
also you ignored my post because you are a retard
 
People that live in europe during the ice age did not left genetic contribution to modern europeans they are extinct also eskimos are not more smarter than an indian ot other people in the tropics
 
The people on the artic that lives in scandinavia amd nort asia are stone age eskimos samiis and siberians and they arent particurally smart of anything the parts of scandinavia and north asia where the people you suck off live is on temperate weather.
Second the people that lived in europe during the ice age is extinct their contrinution to european dna today is almost 0 modern day europeans descend from groups that didnt face the harsh conditions of the ice age, on north asia they do a bit but japanese and chinase descend mainly from people that came from warmer areas

You don't know what you are talking about.

The people who lived in Scandanavia during the last ice age were Scandanavians. Eskimos migrated during the last ice age. The Eskimos migrated to North America from what is now Siberia. But the Eskimos lived separated from the Siberians for long enough that there are significant genetic differences between Eskimos and Siberians.

Scandanavia and North Asia have always had brutally cold winters, especially during the last ice age.

The last ice age ended about 12,000 years ago. The people who lived in Europe during the last ice age are the ancestors of people who lived in Europe in modern times. Your post is full of misinformation.
 
People that live in europe during the ice age did not left genetic contribution to modern europeans they are extinct also eskimos are not more smarter than an indian ot other people in the tropics

People who lived in Europe during the ice age are the ancestors of white people worldwide.
 
You don't know what you are talking about.

The people who lived in Scandanavia during the last ice age were Scandanavians. Eskimos migrated during the last ice age. The Eskimos migrated to North America from what is now Siberia. But the Eskimos lived separated from the Siberians for long enough that there are significant genetic differences between Eskimos and Siberians.

Scandanavia and North Asia have always had brutally cold winters, especially during the last ice age.

The last ice age ended about 12,000 years ago. The people who lived in Europe during the last ice age are the ancestors of people who lived in Europe in modern times. Your post is full of misinformation.
Jfl you are a total idiot 12,000 years ago europe was populated by hunter gatherers they lived the ice age but they did not contribute a lot to the modern day european gene pool
Europeans are mainly a mix of EEF (early european farmers) that came from anatolia 9.000 years ago and indo europeans that arrived 4.000 years ago
 
Go fuck yourself grayfaggot
 
Sanest GrAYcel on .is
 
Jfl you are a total idiot 12,000 years ago europe was populated by hunter gatherers they lived the ice age but they did not contribute a lot to the modern day european gene pool
Europeans are mainly a mix of EEF (early european farmers) that came from anatolia 9.000 years ago and indo europeans that arrived 4.000 years ago


Yes, 12,000 years ago Europe was populated by hunter gatherers. All humans on Earth were hunter gatherers 12,000 years ago.

The hunter-gatherers in Europe 12,000 years ago eventually became farmers. They are the ancestors of modern day white people.

What is your source that Europeans today are mostly descended from people who came from Anatolia 9000 years ago and Indo-Europeans that came 4000 years ago?
 
South American Mestizo here, and we are strikingly similar to Africans in a lot of ways

And y'all are similar to Australian Aborigines. All of you tropical people have similarities with each other.
 
Eskimos have higher IQ than all other groups of mestizos and Native Americans.

Average Eskimo IQ:90

Average overall Native American IQ: 85
probably a load of bullshit. you can measure a races intelligence by their civilisational development and eskimos never build anything beyond igloos. even aztecs and incans had decent civilisations and they were fairly stupid
 
Yes, 12,000 years ago Europe was populated by hunter gatherers. All humans on Earth were hunter gatherers 12,000 years ago.

The hunter-gatherers in Europe 12,000 years ago eventually became farmers. They are the ancestors of modern day white people.

What is your source that Europeans today are mostly descended from people who came from Anatolia 9000 years ago and Indo-Europeans that came 4000 years ago?
The hunter gatherer population of europe was wiped out put it on your head the people with the most hunter gatherer om europe are baltic people and they are not the peak of civilization and its just like 12%
Anything of what you said had sense
Then why nort american natives that live on similar weather
Lol you even mention abos and abos also live on similar weather to europe not all australia is tropical but you dont know nothing about that you dont nothing about none
 
The "Cold Weather = high IQ" trash strikes again.

The biggest flaw in it is history itself. Did the first European civilization start in Scandinavia? No it started in Mediterranean Greece. Did the largest ancient European civilization begin in Great Britain? No it began in Mediterranean Italy. Was writing independently invented in Siberia? No, it was invented in Mesoamerica, the Middle East, central China, and Egypt, none of which are cold. While the Indus Valley Civilization was getting its start in tropical India, the eskimos in Alaska were living like savages.

History isn't easily explained by simple correlations.
 
The "Cold Weather = high IQ" trash strikes again.

The biggest flaw in it is history itself. Did the first European civilization start in Scandinavia? No it started in Mediterranean Greece. Did the largest ancient European civilization begin in Great Britain? No it began in Mediterranean Italy. Was writing independently invented in Siberia? No, it was invented in Mesoamerica, the Middle East, central China, and Egypt, none of which are cold. While the Indus Valley Civilization was getting its start in tropical India, the eskimos in Alaska were living like savages.

History isn't easily explained by simple correlations.

Mesoamerica, the Middle East, central China, and Egypt were all cold during the last ice age.

The Indians in India had lived in Europe during previous ice ages, raising their IQs over sub-Saharan African IQs.
 
Amerindians descend from people who once inhabited SEA. The warm climate of South America is quite similar to the warmth of SEA, so they evolved in a similar way to their ancestors.

It's also worth noting that South American tribes intermixed with Polynesians who reached the edge of the continent.
 
probably a load of bullshit. you can measure a races intelligence by their civilisational development and eskimos never build anything beyond igloos. even aztecs and incans had decent civilisations and they were fairly stupid

Based on my data, groups such as Yakuts average around 95-98.
 
Mesoamerica, the Middle East, central China, and Egypt were all cold during the last ice age.

The Indians in India had lived in Europe during previous ice ages, raising their IQs over sub-Saharan African IQs.
Ice Age Europeans? You mean the same ones that got wiped out and genetically replaced by Central Asian Indo-Europeans back in 3rd Millennium BC? Those Ice Age Europeans!

Just stop now and come up with a new reason for why white skin equals awesome and dark skin equals horrible. You're only embarrassing yourself at this point.
 
Ice Age Europeans? You mean the same ones that got wiped out and genetically replaced by Central Asian Indo-Europeans back in 3rd Millennium BC? Those Ice Age Europeans!

What is your source for this?
 
Ice Age Europeans? You mean the same ones that got wiped out and genetically replaced by Central Asian Indo-Europeans back in 3rd Millennium BC? Those Ice Age Europeans!

Just stop now and come up with a new reason for why white skin equals awesome and dark skin equals horrible. You're only embarrassing yourself at this point.

What is your source for this? Maybe you are going to make me eat crow here.

You're not thinking that I only mean Neanderthals when I speak of "ice age Europeans"; are you? The homo sapiens in Europe wiped out the Neanderthals about 25,000 years ago.
 
Imo this is wrong but partially correct. I think winter does boost IQ but not to degree you are saying.
 
why are indians doing so well when they're tropical,
 
why are indians doing so well when they're tropical,

The people who became the Indians first lived in Europe for thousands of years. Then they migrated from Europe to India. The thousands of years that the ancestors of Indians spent in Europe elevated Indians' IQ.
 

Similar threads

La Grande Infamie
Replies
5
Views
166
udeactive
udeactive
L
Replies
9
Views
122
NorthernWind
NorthernWind
comradespiderman29
Replies
17
Views
376
wastedcodeine
wastedcodeine
tandoorichickencel
Replies
9
Views
333
Therapywasawaste
Therapywasawaste
TrueGlassesCel
Replies
22
Views
411
Emba
Emba

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top