Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Trickle-down sexual economics

  • Thread starter Copexodius Maximus
  • Start date
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Mentally destroyed by reality
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
47,487
Many people criticize neoliberals cucked policies of supply-side economics, where governments invest in large businesses to increase production, which in theory will make them open more businesses, employ more people, and increase production and consumption.



Obviously this doesn’t work, and is just welfare for rich people at the end of the day. This is called trickle down economics. The same is happening in the sexual marketplace, where the increasing promiscuity is benefitting the Chads who are getting most of the pussy, while the normies and incels rot like serfs.

71DFE6F5 D32F 438F 97A5 BA711473D643
 
Last edited:
Sarah: Female rights are the future billy, come fight with me to gain female rights for women! It'll benefit all of us! Think of the benefits of women and men working side by side!"

Billy: O-okay.. I do this, and maybe we could hang out some time...?

Sarah: Uh.. Yeah of course billy! I love a man who respects women and treats them equally!



"But Sarah didn't love men who respected women or treated her as an equal. After she gained her freedoms, she ghosted billy, and went on to date a man who beat her every single day of her life. She then spawned two daughters, who followed in her footsteps."

"No one has heard from her since."
 
The feminist revolution was never about sexual equality or egalitarianism, it had everything to do with creating an unregulated sexual market system giving all females the ability to have unrestrained sexual hypergamy without the restraints of traditionalism. From it's very beginning it was always about unrestrained and unregulated access to Chad [top percentage of men] at the expendability of the majority of the male population. This sexual market system we can also call sexual capitalism because women's sexual reproductive behavior purely revolves around sexual capital. Now here is the problem and where things get interesting, in economic capitalism there comes a problem where demand exceeds supply, eventually there is a huge correction or crash as a sort of imbalance manifests itself. It is always proceeded by either an inflationary or deflationary event. What we have now is a majority of women desiring Chads but there isn't enough Chads to go around for them all, also the lifestyle that a majority of modern women want anymore isn't sustainable as we're literally in a global depressionary economic environment. So basically, since a sexual market system or even sexual capitalism follows the same economic rules and principles like a regular market does what this entails is that at some point in the future the sexual marketplace of female hypergamy will crash overtime as well.

The period of time we live in is unprecedented where it isn't comparable to any known past historical era in the age of globalization and postmodernism, so what happens afterwards when this sexual marketplace of female hypergamy crashes is a bit unknown, but if it is like any other kind of economic market system what it probably means is that the high priced commodity unaffordable to a majority now will eventually go through a price or value reduction at some point in the future. In the sense of a sexual marketplace, women's current sexual value will be drastically cut and reduced in half concerning both price or overall value as this reductionary transformation takes place. :feelsjuice:
 
Last edited:
This is fantastic OP

literally i laughed out loud

this mogs the shit out of current day SNL, modern day Belushi

the concept is great and the picture is just awesome roasties laughing that the betas got suckered into believing they would receive a crumb after the "liberation", when in reality it has become a pseudo fascist hell where discrimination is rife, based purely on,looks and status almost exclusively
 
This is fantastic OP

literally i laughed out loud

this mogs the shit out of current day SNL, modern day Belushi

the concept is great and the picture is just awesome roasties laughing that the betas got suckered into believing they would receive a crumb after the "liberation", when in reality it has become a pseudo fascist hell where discrimination is rife, based purely on,looks and status almost exclusively
It's interesting to note that with the collapse of ancient Greek democracy or even ancient Roman republicanism a form of monarchy and autocracy emerged. If neo-liberal capitalism is responsible for the advent of the modern day sexual marketplace with its out of control sexual hypergamy it could be argued that a new kind of autocracy will emerge from the ruins of a failed and collapsed neo-liberal world order. With that a new male patriarchy emerges from the ruins of a collapsed sexual marketplace system that was spawned from neo-liberalism itself. :society:
 
Last edited:
Sarah: Female rights are the future billy, come fight with me to gain female rights for women! It'll benefit all of us! Think of the benefits of women and men working side by side!"

Billy: O-okay.. I do this, and maybe we could hang out some time...?

Sarah: Uh.. Yeah of course billy! I love a man who respects women and treats them equally!



"But Sarah didn't love men who respected women or treated her as an equal. After she gained her freedoms, she ghosted billy, and went on to date a man who beat her every single day of her life. She then spawned two daughters, who followed in her footsteps."

"No one has heard from her since."
Brootal gorillapill


The feminist revolution was never about sexual equality or egalitarianism, it had everything to do with creating an unregulated sexual market system giving all females the ability to have unrestrained sexual hypergamy without the restraints of traditionalism. From it's very beginning it was always about unrestrained and unregulated access to Chad [top percentage of men] at the expendability of the majority of the male population. This sexual market system we can also call sexual capitalism because women's sexual reproductive behavior purely revolves around sexual capital. Now here is the problem and where things get interesting, in economic capitalism there comes a problem where demand exceeds supply, eventually there is a huge correction or crash as a sort of imbalance manifests itself. It is always proceeded by either an inflationary or deflationary event. What we have now is a majority of women desiring Chads but there isn't enough Chads to go around for them all, also the lifestyle that a majority of modern women want anymore isn't sustainable as we're in a global depressionary economic environment. So basically, since a sexual market system or even sexual capitalism follows the same economic rules and principles like a regular market does what this entails is that at some point in the future the sexual marketplace of female hypergamy will crash overtime as well.

The period of time we live in is unprecedented where it isn't comparable to any known past historical era in the age of globalization and postmodernism, so what happens afterwards when this sexual marketplace of female hypergamy crashes is a bit unknown, but if it is like any other kind of economic market system what it probably means is that the high priced commodity unaffordable to a majority now will eventually go through a price or value reduction at some point in the future. In the sense of a sexual marketplace, women's sexual value will be drastically cut and reduced in half concerning both price or value. :feelsjuice:
It is regulated, but only in favour of the females. Hence why women can choose to have an abortion while males are not allowed to walk away from the child. Female teachers can have sex with kids, while males are called pedophiles for watching kids play in the park. Women can say the next day she regrets it and claim it is rape, throwing the man in jail with 0 proof. A wife can fuck chad and have his kid, and the husband will be forced to pay child support for it still. Prostitution is illegal.


This is fantastic OP

literally i laughed out loud

this mogs the shit out of current day SNL, modern day Belushi

the concept is great and the picture is just awesome roasties laughing that the betas got suckered into believing they would receive a crumb after the "liberation", when in reality it has become a pseudo fascist hell where discrimination is rife, based purely on,looks and status almost exclusively
Glad you liked the post brocel :feelsokman:


It's interesting to note that with the collapse of ancient Greek democracy or even ancient Roman republicanism a form of monarchy and autocracy emerged. If neo-liberal capitalism is responsible for the advent of the modern day sexual marketplace with its out of control sexual hypergamy it could be argued that a new kind of autocracy will emerge from the ruins of a failed and collapsed neo-liberal world order. With that a new patriarchy emerges from the ruins of a collapsed sexual marketplace system that was spawned from neo-liberalism itself. :society:
Personally I’m a libertarian, but this means the government doesn’t do shit like social engineering or trying to interfere with how families and individuals interact on their own. And on their own and without parasitizing off the government, conservative societies will emerge on their own socially. Neoliberalism won’t last, as it is done through top down control and isn’t sustainable.


Although many people will be skeptical due to people confusing libertarianism with neoliberalism.
 
Last edited:
The feminist revolution was never about sexual equality or egalitarianism, it had everything to do with creating an unregulated sexual market system giving all females the ability to have unrestrained sexual hypergamy without the restraints of traditionalism. From it's very beginning it was always about unrestrained and unregulated access to Chad [top percentage of men] at the expendability of the majority of the male population. This sexual market system we can also call sexual capitalism because women's sexual reproductive behavior purely revolves around sexual capital. Now here is the problem and where things get interesting, in economic capitalism there comes a problem where demand exceeds supply, eventually there is a huge correction or crash as a sort of imbalance manifests itself. It is always proceeded by either an inflationary or deflationary event. What we have now is a majority of women desiring Chads but there isn't enough Chads to go around for them all, also the lifestyle that a majority of modern women want anymore isn't sustainable as we're literally in a global depressionary economic environment. So basically, since a sexual market system or even sexual capitalism follows the same economic rules and principles like a regular market does what this entails is that at some point in the future the sexual marketplace of female hypergamy will crash overtime as well.

The period of time we live in is unprecedented where it isn't comparable to any known past historical era in the age of globalization and postmodernism, so what happens afterwards when this sexual marketplace of female hypergamy crashes is a bit unknown, but if it is like any other kind of economic market system what it probably means is that the high priced commodity unaffordable to a majority now will eventually go through a price or value reduction at some point in the future. In the sense of a sexual marketplace, women's sexual value will be drastically cut and reduced in half concerning both price or overall value. :feelsjuice:
1622717369086
 
Brootal gorillapill



It is regulated, but only in favour of the females. Hence why women can choose to have an abortion while males are not allowed to walk away from the child. Female teachers can have sex with kids, while males are called pedophiles for watching kids play in the park. Women can say the next day she regrets it and claim it is rape, throwing the man in jail with 0 proof. A wife can fuck chad and have his kid, and the husband will be forced to pay child support for it still. Prostitution is illegal.



Glad you liked the post brocel :feelsokman:



Personally I’m a libertarian, but this means the government doesn’t do shit like social engineering or trying to interfere with how families and individuals interact on their own. And on their own and without parasitizing off the government, conservative societies will emerge on their own socially. Neoliberalism won’t last, as it is done through top down control and isn’t sustainable.

View attachment 452047
Although many people will be skeptical due to people confusing libertarianism with neoliberalism.
That's a point I'm trying to get at, a foid's nature is purely sexual capitalism and since they can do whatever they want to men now without any negative repercussions is exactly something you would expect from a completely unregulated social sexual environment.

Feminism is pure unadulterated female sexual capitalism unregulated, a regulated social sexual environment would be more patriarchal and historically or culturally traditional. :feelsjuice:
 
Last edited:
That's a point I'm trying to get at, a foid's nature is purely sexual capitalism and since they can do whatever they want to men now without any negative repercussions is exactly something you would expect from a completely unregulated environment.

Feminism is pure unadulterated female sexual capitalism unregulated, a regulated social sexual environment would be more patriarchal and historically traditional. :feelsjuice:
Yes, the behaviour of females is unregulated, but the system is still heavily regulated due to males being regulated. Kind of reminds me of how neoliberals have barely any regulations for large corporations, but have huge amounts of regulations on individuals, like our ability to do drugs, fuck hookers, or collect rain water.
 
Brootal gorillapill



It is regulated, but only in favour of the females. Hence why women can choose to have an abortion while males are not allowed to walk away from the child. Female teachers can have sex with kids, while males are called pedophiles for watching kids play in the park. Women can say the next day she regrets it and claim it is rape, throwing the man in jail with 0 proof. A wife can fuck chad and have his kid, and the husband will be forced to pay child support for it still. Prostitution is illegal.



Glad you liked the post brocel :feelsokman:



Personally I’m a libertarian, but this means the government doesn’t do shit like social engineering or trying to interfere with how families and individuals interact on their own. And on their own and without parasitizing off the government, conservative societies will emerge on their own socially. Neoliberalism won’t last, as it is done through top down control and isn’t sustainable.

View attachment 452047
Although many people will be skeptical due to people confusing libertarianism with neoliberalism.
Libertarianism doesn't work, libertarianism, neo-liberalism, communism, capitalism, and modern day conservatism are all bastard children of classical liberalism. Classical liberalism was a mistake with its whole insistence on individualism or privatization, even communism with its insistence upon collectivism has repeatedly failed at remedying the disease known as classical liberalism because it also originates from that same ideological inclination historically.
Yes, the behaviour of females is unregulated, but the system is still heavily regulated due to males being regulated. Kind of reminds me of how neoliberals have barely any regulations for large corporations, but have huge amounts of regulations on individuals, like our ability to do drugs, fuck hookers, or collect rain water.
It isn't a regulation though, it is the state empowering the deregulation of female sexual capitalism, much in the same way neo-liberalism deregulates everything else beyond human sexuality.
 
Last edited:
Libertarianism doesn't work, libertarianism, neo-liberalism, communism, capitalism, and modern day conservatism are all bastard children of classical liberalism. Classical liberalism was a mistake with its whole insistence on individualism or privatization, even communism with its insistence upon collectivism has repeatedly failed at remedying the disease known as classical liberalism because it also originates from that historically.

It isn't a regulation though, it is the state empowering the deregulation of female sexual capitalism, much in the same way neo-liberalism deregulates everything else beyond human sexuality.
No it doesn’t, neoliberalism doesn’t deregulate everything, that anarchistic. Neoliberalism deregulates the economy for large corporations (women in the sexual market place) and actuvely supports them through everyone’s tax money (sounds familiar doesnt it). Neoliberalism takes away liberties like being able to do drugs or fuck hookers. Neoliberalism is by definition is one of the most corrupt form of capitalism you can think of, where the government chooses winners and losers (and they usually choose whoever fills their pockets the most).

People have a misconception on classical liberalism and libertarianism. Libertarianism is basically where people are free to form societies however they want from the grass roots level, without coercion. This sounds like it would lead to mass inceldom, but this isn’t the case. This scenario will make all the women that whore around and not get married die off because no government will be there to bail them or their bastard kids out. All societies have evolved to be a certain way traditionally because they were essentially naturally selected to be that way. Monarchs and authoritarians made sure to enforce law and such, but in ancient times they still had justice through vigilantes, usually families and communities. Monarchs and authoritarians are just people who came to power because they were probably some tribal chieftains and forced farmers to pay them their harvest or face being killed.
 
I would've never fallen for that shit and put those whores in their place from the beginning.
 
No it doesn’t, neoliberalism doesn’t deregulate everything, that anarchistic. Neoliberalism deregulates the economy for large corporations (women in the sexual market place) and actuvely supports them through everyone’s tax money (sounds familiar doesnt it). Neoliberalism takes away liberties like being able to do drugs or fuck hookers. Neoliberalism is by definition is one of the most corrupt form of capitalism you can think of, where the government chooses winners and losers (and they usually choose whoever fills their pockets the most).

People have a misconception on classical liberalism and libertarianism. Libertarianism is basically where people are free to form societies however they want from the grass roots level, without coercion. This sounds like it would lead to mass inceldom, but this isn’t the case. This scenario will make all the women that whore around and not get married die off because no government will be there to bail them or their bastard kids out. All societies have evolved to be a certain way traditionally because they were essentially naturally selected to be that way. Monarchs and authoritarians made sure to enforce law and such, but in ancient times they still had justice through vigilantes, usually families and communities. Monarchs and authoritarians are just people who came to power because they were probably some tribal chieftains and forced farmers to pay them their harvest or face being killed.
It's not anarchistic at all, under neo-liberalism it deregulates the markets so that private individual companies can come in gorging themselves upon profits [chasing after capital] largely at workers expense with stagnant wages that overtime loses all purchasing power.

Same thing with radical feminism under neo-liberalism, it deregulates the sexual marketplace so that private individual foids can come in with their sexual capitalism gorging themselves on sexual hypergamy [chasing after only the top percentage of men: Chad] indulging themselves at a large majority of men's expense that become societally disposable overtime where majority male incentive stagnates into nothing not having the sexual purchasing power it once had previously. Although not entirely the same the close similarities are certainly there.

And of course foids can do all of that because they control, biologically have, and monopolize having the means of re-production where men are constantly forced at their mercy in all cruel ways possible or imaginable socially. :feelsjuice:

Classical liberalism, or neo-liberalism, it's all the same bullshit, it all ends the same way with very minor differentiation.
 
Last edited:
It's not anarchistic at all, under neo-liberalism it deregulates the markets so that private individual companies can come in gorging themselves upon profits [chasing after capital] largely at workers expense with stagnant wages that overtime loses all purchasing power.

Same thing with radical feminism under neo-liberalism, it deregulates the sexual marketplace so that private individual foids can come in with their sexual capitalism gorging themselves on sexual hypergamy [chasing after only the top percentage of men: Chad] indulging themselves at a large majority of men's expense that become societally disposable overtime where majority male incentive stagnates into nothing not having the sexual purchasing power it once had previously. Although not entirely the same the close similarities are certainly there.

And of course foids can do all of that because they control, biologically have, and monopolize having the means of re-production where men are constantly forced at their mercy in all cruel ways possible or imaginable socially. :feelsjuice:

Classical liberalism, or neo-liberalism, it's all the same bullshit, it all ends the same way with very minor differentiation.
Judging by your response, you didn't even read everything I wrote. I explained why sexual deregulation doesn't lead to severe hypergamy, but rather it is the selective deregulation for women but not for men. Reread what I wrote on that part and see if you agree with that or not.
 
No it doesn’t, neoliberalism doesn’t deregulate everything, that anarchistic. Neoliberalism deregulates the economy for large corporations (women in the sexual market place) and actuvely supports them through everyone’s tax money (sounds familiar doesnt it). Neoliberalism takes away liberties like being able to do drugs or fuck hookers. Neoliberalism is by definition is one of the most corrupt form of capitalism you can think of, where the government chooses winners and losers (and they usually choose whoever fills their pockets the most).

People have a misconception on classical liberalism and libertarianism. Libertarianism is basically where people are free to form societies however they want from the grass roots level, without coercion. This sounds like it would lead to mass inceldom, but this isn’t the case. This scenario will make all the women that whore around and not get married die off because no government will be there to bail them or their bastard kids out. All societies have evolved to be a certain way traditionally because they were essentially naturally selected to be that way. Monarchs and authoritarians made sure to enforce law and such, but in ancient times they still had justice through vigilantes, usually families and communities. Monarchs and authoritarians are just people who came to power because they were probably some tribal chieftains and forced farmers to pay them their harvest or face being killed.
There is no such thing as any kind of society that exists without some kind of coercion, I am the anti social utopian whether it is socialism or libertarianism. I make no distinguishment between capitalism, communism, or socialism as they're all systems that fail by falling under pressure of human nature. Human nature isn't moral or ethical, it is cruel, nasty, and brutal revolving around various deceptions. Neo-liberalism, or neo-liberal capitalism is what you would expect from our corrupt over class of hypocritical rulers, if anything it was the evolutionary manifestation of capitalism itself under a deregulated government format. Ironically, neo-liberal capitalism is destroying itself because the host is dying and the (((parasites))) need to infect a new body, problem is that there might not be a new body to infect because the economic collapse or fallout will be a global one.
 
Last edited:
There is no such thing as any kind of society that exists without some kind of coercion, I am the anti social utopian whether it is socialism or libertarianism. Human nature isn't moral or ethical, it is cruel, nasty, and brutal revolving around various deceptions. Neo-liberalism, or neo-liberal capitalism is what you would expect from our corrupt over class of hypocritical rulers, if anything it was the evolutionary manifestation of capitalism itself under a deregulated government format. Ironically, neo-liberal capitalism is destroying itself because the host is dying and the (((parasites))) need to infect a new body, problem is that there might not be a new body to infect because the economic collapse or fallout will be global.
Coercion does exist, I’m not talking about that Ayn Rand kind of libertarianism, but rather the practical one talked by people like Milton Friedman, where the best things comes from spontaneous order, except in few key areas like military (obviously), pollution control, etc.
 
Coercion does exist, I’m not talking about that Ayn Rand kind of libertarianism, but rather the practical one talked by people like Milton Friedman, where the best things comes from spontaneous order, except in few key areas like military (obviously), pollution control, etc.
Milton Friedman?:feelskek: Whether it's so called progressives or conservatives people like their conceptualized social utopias. As for me I'm the guy that likes studying self destruction, mass extinctions, grand failure of entire organized systems, and collapse of empires, self destruction, collapse, or war are my field of interests. :feelsjuice:

Everything human beings constructs always breaks down, nothing ever lasts overtime, and nothing is ever permanent other than human nature itself. :feelsEhh:
 
Last edited:
Milton Friedman?:feelskek: Whether it's so called progressives or conservatives people like their conceptualized social utopias. As for me I'm the guy that likes studying self destruction, mass extinctions, grand failure of entire organized systems, and collapse of empires, self destruction, collapse, or war are my field of interests. :feelsjuice:

Everything human beings constructs always breaks down, nothing ever lasts overtime, and nothing is ever permanent other than human nature itself. :feelsEhh:
Human nature won’t be permanent once the designer babies come out.
 
Human nature won’t be permanent once the designer babies come out.
You presume a world of infinite energy or natural resources in constant abundance, I don't make that mistake to which many people and thinkers do nowadays. :society:
 
You presume a world of infinite energy or natural resources in constant abundance, I don't make that mistake to which many people and thinkers do nowadays. :society:
You don’t think designer babies will happen?
 
Cursed be he who believes woman.
 
You don’t think designer babies will happen?
You're talking to somebody who questions whether technological industrial society will remain intact or not 2060 and beyond. I think the future will be a collapse of technological industrial society on a grand scale as it is no longer able to maintain and sustain itself any longer. :feelsjuice:
 
Last edited:
Sarah: Female rights are the future billy, come fight with me to gain female rights for women! It'll benefit all of us! Think of the benefits of women and men working side by side!"

Billy: O-okay.. I do this, and maybe we could hang out some time...?

Sarah: Uh.. Yeah of course billy! I love a man who respects women and treats them equally!



"But Sarah didn't love men who respected women or treated her as an equal. After she gained her freedoms, she ghosted billy, and went on to date a man who beat her every single day of her life. She then spawned two daughters, who followed in her footsteps."

"No one has heard from her since."
Black pilled story. Women love evil attractive men
 
Cursed be he who believes woman.
Amen


You're talking to somebody who questions whether technological industrial society will remain intact or not 2060 and beyond. I think the future will be a collapse of technological industrial society on a grand scale as it is no longer able to maintain and sustain itself any longer. :feelsjuice:
I think it will last for a few centuries at least tbh


Black pilled story. Women love evil attractive men
:blackpill:
 
We shall see, I'm not so optimistic. :feelsEhh:
Idk bro, people have been saying world is going to end from climate change, war, and many other things for so long. That’s why buffer the date to long after I’m gone JFL.
 
Idk bro, people have been saying world is going to end from climate change, war, and many other things for so long. That’s why buffer the date to long after I’m gone JFL.
Most people want to believe in the most asinine things because it gives them hope or because they're inclined to naive wishful thinking, absurd fantasies in my mind. I just prefer seeing the dark cruel world of hatred and intolerance for what it is.
 
The feminist revolution was never about sexual equality or egalitarianism, it had everything to do with creating an unregulated sexual market system giving all females the ability to have unrestrained sexual hypergamy without the restraints of traditionalism. From it's very beginning it was always about unrestrained and unregulated access to Chad [top percentage of men] at the expendability of the majority of the male population. This sexual market system we can also call sexual capitalism because women's sexual reproductive behavior purely revolves around sexual capital. Now here is the problem and where things get interesting, in economic capitalism there comes a problem where demand exceeds supply, eventually there is a huge correction or crash as a sort of imbalance manifests itself. It is always proceeded by either an inflationary or deflationary event. What we have now is a majority of women desiring Chads but there isn't enough Chads to go around for them all, also the lifestyle that a majority of modern women want anymore isn't sustainable as we're literally in a global depressionary economic environment. So basically, since a sexual market system or even sexual capitalism follows the same economic rules and principles like a regular market does what this entails is that at some point in the future the sexual marketplace of female hypergamy will crash overtime as well.

The period of time we live in is unprecedented where it isn't comparable to any known past historical era in the age of globalization and postmodernism, so what happens afterwards when this sexual marketplace of female hypergamy crashes is a bit unknown, but if it is like any other kind of economic market system what it probably means is that the high priced commodity unaffordable to a majority now will eventually go through a price or value reduction at some point in the future. In the sense of a sexual marketplace, women's current sexual value will be drastically cut and reduced in half concerning both price or overall value as this reductionary transformation takes place. :feelsjuice:
 
Just as the capitalist pisses and throws feces in the faces of their workers within the corporate model telling them that they're lazy, not ambitious, and refuses to make sacrifices for overall life success all the while monopolizing the means of production the sexual capitalist that is known as female does much the same regarding sexual reproductive behavior owning the means of reproduction.

You're not physically muscular enough, not wealthy enough, not educated enough, not socially affluent enough, not ambitious enough, and so on never ending of criticisms, demoralizations, or insults by the very selective sexual capitalists known as women.

One model exploits its workers in terms of labor, the other exploits biological males in terms of sex, relationships, and reproduction. :society:

The market capitalist makes false narratives that if you work hard enough maybe one day you can enjoy the standard of living that they themselves enjoy which of course is a lie for a majority of people, likewise the sexual capitalist that is female will say that if only you work hard enough at personal improvement perhaps some day they'll let you enjoy the fruits of their sexual utility between their legs or reproductive access but once again is just another lie for a majority of men overall.

One model constantly dehumanizes its workers and the other model constantly dehumanizes men.

Under market capitalism a majority of wealth becomes centralized in the hands of a few top percentage of men, under sexual capitalism sexual intercourse and reproduction becomes centralized under sexual hypergamy also in the hands of a few top percentage of men [chads]. :feelsjuice:
 
Last edited:
policies of supply-side economics, where governments invest in large businesses to increase production
I support supply-side measures, but I don't support any privileges to large businesses. Should be fair and level-playing field for all businesses and would-be businesses.

Demand-side economics supporters are just leftists who want more government spending and who want to take more of your money and decide how your money should be spent instead of you yourself knowing it better what is the most important thing to spend your money.​


-----------------------------------------------------
Yes, it is true that increasing/-ed promiscuity is bad for at the very least for the below average men.
 
Last edited:
Nothing good ever came from asking a woman´s opinion.
 
I support supply-side measures, but I don't support any privileges to large businesses. Should be fair and level-playing field for all businesses and would-be businesses.

Demand-side economics supporters are just leftists who want more government spending and who want to take more of your money and decide how your money should be spent instead of you yourself knowing it better what is the most important thing to spend your money.​


-----------------------------------------------------
Yes, it is true that increasing/-ed promiscuity is bad for at the very least for the below average men.
I don’t support demand-side either, it seems to be a failure mostly. Supply side seems to be the same as well honestly, it doesn’t seem it has empirically worked either, and just as demand-side is leftist bullshit, this is neoliberal bullshit. You say you don’t support large bussinesses getting welfare essentially, but this is the result of supply side economic policies.
 
I hate when people ask why we are against sexual freedom and promiscuity if we want to get laid exactly for this reason. I cannot compete in a free market with Chad. Here in the US, Christianity was like the Teddy Roosevelt of the sexual market.
 
You say you don’t support large bussinesses getting welfare essentially, but this is the result of supply side economic policies.
How? Still you don't explain what the fuck are you talking about.

What welfare?

I support reductions in public expenses, regulation and taxes (in Finland). Of course that means EU exit, EU common market exit, EU customs union exit, UN exit, including all UN conventions, targeting as big increases in greenhouse gas emissions as possible (instead of carbon neutrality by 2035 which is the most extreme policy of any country in the world)...
 
High IQ post.

But I see it slightly different.
In my opinion "female liberation" is a subversive social technique, with the goal of destabilizing a society.
A "social poison" or "social cancer".

"foids rights" "faggot rights" "negroes rights" those are tools/weapons, political and ideological tools/weapons.

The men that gave rights to foids didn't do it with the idea of "we will help woman".
Nor they thought "we will join in the fun and have lots of sex".
No. The men behind foid liberation knew perfectly well what the consequences of it would be.
That the society would become weaker and divided.

Women are very, very easy to manipulate, emotionally, psychologically and politically.
1 Chad alone can use thousands of women as he sees fit. And they will obey him like slaves.

When foids flooded the labor pool, halving the cost of labor and halving wages, the greedy corporations loved it.
When foids became able to vote, without having to be subject to military draft, the corrupt politicians loved it.

Any politician that is pro-women is a corrupt piece of garbage.

In resume, jews and corrupt men pushed for foid liberation to destabilize the West and profit from the chaos.
Maybe, but it’s not always easy to know intent. Many people could say it was just unseen downstream consequences of policies.
How? Still you don't explain what the fuck are you talking about.

What welfare?

I support reductions in public expenses, regulation and taxes (in Finland). Of course that means EU exit, EU common market exit, EU customs union exit, UN exit, including all UN conventions, targeting as big increases in greenhouse gas emissions as possible (instead of carbon neutrality by 2035 which is the most extreme policy of any country in the world)...
Supply side economics usually tries to make sure corporations that are “too big to fail” don’t fail because that will fuck up the production, hence the bailouts of these corporations. Also, large corporations receive huge subsidies, handouts, tax subsidies because they claim it will create more jobs to incentivize businesses. I know you don’t support it, but this is part of supply side economics.


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FwpIBJ3jbFA
 
Last edited:
I hate when people ask why we are against sexual freedom and promiscuity if we want to get laid exactly for this reason. I cannot compete in a free market with Chad. Here in the US, Christianity was like the Teddy Roosevelt of the sexual market.
The goal was creating a large underclass of sexually eunuch male wageslaves, they thought that if they threw enough video games, drugs, anime, and pornography at us it would keep us all in our place mentally sedated despite being sexually celibate and not reproducing, they thought wrong because eventually we get bored with all that useless shit where we start to question everything including the very fabric of reality itself.:society::feelsjuice:

They haven't even begun to understand the full consequences quite yet of ruining and fucking over a majority of the male population, but they will overtime much to their own misfortune as time progresses. Needless to say, by denying a majority of men pussy, relationships with the opposite sex, and full meaningful social lives it is bound to radicalize males everywhere inevitably. :feelsdevil:
 
Last edited:
American 1960s counter-culture; FREE SEX FOR EVERYONE!!!

Waves of feminism; sexual revolution now!!!

Science papers; states that hookup culture is common among females


Laws; changed to decriminalize premarital sex


Me as an incel in 2021; where sex
 
American 1960s counter-culture; FREE SEX FOR EVERYONE!!!

Waves of feminism; sexual revolution now!!!

Science papers; states that hookup culture is common among females


Laws; changed to decriminalize premarital sex


Me as an incel in 2021; where sex
The 1960s was basically the era ideologically of a synthesis between Christianity, Marxism, and social utopianism [international socialism], but then the boomers got older and more greedy betraying their own social revolution where it was all about preserving their own wealth or the wealth of their own individual families at future generations general expense, they stopped being socialist overtime where instead became a whole entire generation of geriatric crony capitalists, so long as they can enslave younger generations so they can live a bit longer in comfort while having their pensions paid by income taxes they'll follow whatever political status quo that maintains it all the way to their graves.
 
Last edited:
The 1960s was basically the era ideologically of a synthesis between Christianity, Marxism, and social utopianism, but then the boomers got older and more greedy where it was all about preserving their own wealth or the wealth of their own families at future generations general expense, they stopped being socialist overtime where instead became a whole entire generation of geriatric crony capitalists, so long as they can enslave younger generations so they can live longer in comfort while having their pensions paid in income taxes they'll follow whatever political status quo that maintains it.
Sex for me, not for thee.
 
Sex for me, not for thee.
It's the bourgeois and the wealthy mistaking their own success as superiority, they view the working class as no better than working human cattle where in their social eugenics form of thinking believe that all the lower social classes have no right to reproduce or where it shouldn't reproduce at all. Essentially the people who benefit the least from implemented feminism is the lower male working class segment and that of course was very intentional on their part. But the thing is in their supreme arrogance is now they have a demographic population crisis combined with sub replacement fertility added with a stagnating economy where the entire currency is going into a hyperinflationary death spiral, somewhere down the line these so called superiors of ours lost all rational thinking within their self glorification concerning both foresight and long term thinking. These same assholes are about to be raped in the ass of the last fifty odd years of social political mismanagement of their own very creation. They're going to reap the whirlwind so very badly, they just don't know it yet. :feelsjuice:
 
Last edited:
It's the bourgeois and the wealthy mistaking their own success as superiority, they view the working class as no better than working cattle where in their social eugenics form of thinking believe all the lower social classes have no right to reproduce or where it shouldn't reproduce at all. But the thing is in their supreme arrogance is now they have a demographic population crisis combined with sub replacement fertility added with a stagnating economy where the entire currency is going into a hyperinflationary death spiral, somewhere down the line these so called superiors of ours lost all rational thinking within their self glorification concerning both foresight and long term thinking. These same assholes are about to be raped in the ass of the last fifty odd years of social political mismanagement of their own creation. They're going to reap the whirlwind so very badly, they just don't know it yet.
Whiteys gotten too comfortable thinking they did everyone a fucking favor, instead they're going down insidiously and without a single shot being fired. Their own ego is their downfall.
 
Whiteys gotten too comfortable thinking they did everyone a fucking favor, instead they're going down insidiously and without a single shot being fired. Their own ego is their downfall.
I'm White dude. :feelskek:
 
Yeah and? Most the world's elites are white dudes or Jewish dudes.
Mostly Jewish in the western sphere with a bunch of shabbos goy who are about to have their anuses splintered off by the ascending Chinese from the east.

It's essentially now the meme where shekelstein is sweating bullets because the bigger Chinese merchant has come to town.

"I'm you, only stronger.":feelskek::feelshaha::feelsohh:
 
Last edited:
Mostly Jewish in the western sphere who are about to have their anuses splintered off by the ascending Chinese.

It's essentially now the meme where shekelstein is sweating bullets because the bigger Chinese merchant has come to town.

"I'm you, only stronger."
Good point, but I wonder how that will turn out. Probably will be a communist shithole for most of the human population. East Asians tends to be callous and cruel when they are exhibiting anti-social behaviors.
 
Good point, but I wonder how that will turn out. Probably will be a communist shithole for most of the human population. East Asians tends to be callous and cruel when they are exhibiting anti-social behaviors.
Two scenarios plays out.

1. The United States collapses like Russian Soviet Union similar to that of 1991 [2022-2028], China becomes the new global hegemony super power, yuan replaces dollar, and international communism replaces the current international neo-liberal world order.

2. World War III. [Something the United States and its vassal state nations cannot win for many numerous reasons, not to mention also the global carnage manifesting as a direct result everywhere.]

We'll know in about seven years or less which path is taken. :feelskek::feelsjuice::feelsEhh:
 
Last edited:
Liberals would make excuses for a poor guy stealing in this system but not an incel raping.
 
Should be pinned or in must-read section
 

Similar threads

AshamedVirgin34
Replies
19
Views
843
AshamedVirgin34
AshamedVirgin34
lonelysince2006
Replies
13
Views
442
lonelysince2006
lonelysince2006
NoobCel420
Replies
9
Views
344
Spyro
Spyro
blackpillednigga
Replies
33
Views
877
Ci Jey
Ci Jey

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top