Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Too much gay shit on the forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fags must be declared mentally unstable which they actually are and should be kept in isolated mental asylum.
Or sent to gulags like Stalin did. No time to think and revolve your life around fetish when you are breaking rocks all day for motherland.
 

Attachments

  • iran_teens_dead.jpg
    iran_teens_dead.jpg
    40.9 KB · Views: 60
Or sent to gulags like Stalin did. No time to think and revolve your life around fetish when you are breaking rocks all day for motherland.
Thoughts on Auba scoring for 1-0?
 
Or sent to gulags like Stalin did. No time to think and revolve your life around fetish when you are breaking rocks all day for motherland.
True. This time will be Antarctic not Siberia for gulag
 
Gay guys=less competition for us
 
No, I haven't noticed any recent gay shit tbh.
Me neither tbh. Every time there's a gay thread knajjd deletes it pretty quickly, but it's been a while since the last time it happened.
 
Me neither tbh. Every time there's a gay thread knajjd deletes it pretty quickly, but it's been a while since the last time it happened.
Coz you are too tolerant my brazilian friend.
 
Could you give more examples of gay threads and posts?

I can. But I will not. Because if you don't see it therefore you are blind or gay yourself. :feelskek:

Mainlander is kinda queer, but Brazilian people are fucked in heads coz of their ugly carnavals.
 
Yeas yeas and yeas!
 
Faggots = AIDS, literally
 
Maybe I just didn't see the threads or posts you're thinking of.


:waitwhat:


I'm not into them though. It's like saying all Americans are retarded agecucks just because their country is.
Generalizations are far more truthfull than girlish details.
 
I remember someone recently posted about being a tranny and be was swiftly banned permanently and the thread deleted. I think mods are doing fine
 
Generalizations are far more truthfull than girlish details.
But you don't need to use a generalization with me, you saw my posts lots of times. When did I post anything queer? :waitwhat:

I don't even understand what a gay man would be doing here, since even Blackops2cel can get plenty of matches on gay dating apps.
 
Faggots and trannies love to prey upon lonely and disfranchised men. Just look at what they did to /r9k/. Faggotry has to be baned on sight and fag enablers removed from the members list.
this happened recently. I don't remember the user but he was swiftly banned.
The gayest phrase on this forum is "bros before hoes"
just throw your friends under the bus for a crumb of female attention theory
 
I legit saw a thread where a guy was advocating every man neutering themselves and turning themselves into "Bromosexuals"
 
Trannies are all mentally ill failed men
 
I legit saw a thread where a guy was advocating every man neutering themselves and turning themselves into "Bromosexuals"
We will convert fags into aushvitzsexuals sending them back to death camps. Liberal Sodom will not last long mark my words.
well this is a gay ass thread.
Coz you are here
 
Stupid comment from another one aids infested gay rat
Can you explain again how gays affect our inceldom negatively other than having to put out with their potential public shit?
 
Faggots are gay
 
Did you notice? Those degenerates come here pretending to be incels but infact they want to propagate their degenerate ideas here.

Faggots are shit
Tranies are shit.
Liberals are in general shit.


That is what normal incel thinks.

Actually as an incel you should encourage homosexuality ..cuz its lower alot of man from the competion on females ..
 
My best friend where have you been
 
Ive made some gay threads sometimes ngl
 
Did you notice? Those degenerates come here pretending to be incels but infact they want to propagate their degenerate ideas here.

Faggots are shit
Tranies are shit.
Liberals are in general shit.


That is what normal incel thinks.
*trannies
Y'know that's weird, singular is tranny, why do we change Y to IE? Is that a universal rule?
The double-consonant is must though, otherwise it would sound like "train".

I'm against the policies of the Democratic Party liberals of the United States, and Trudeau's Liberal Party of Canada, but I believe those to be corrupted versions of liberalism and I don't consider myself anti-liberal in general.

Liberalism can be a broad idea and "protecting and enhancing individual freedom" is at it's core message, a good idea to me. I want to freedom to play whatever vidya I want, read whatever comics I want, etc.

Where liberalism goes astray is basically they take protecting SOME GROUPS (ie homosexuals/transexuals/women) freedoms as such a priority that it begins to encroach upon others' freedoms.

I would say I'm an egalitarian-liberal in that I'm for protecting freedom so long as it doesn't inhibit others' freedom. The central problem is non-egalitarian liberal policies. Shit like thinking it's so important to protect a tranny's right to be considered a gender that they don't care about protecting someone else's right to make an informed choice about who they fuck, and basically legalize rape against tranny's partners through deception regarding gender.

While I realize that informing a partner about your birth sex isn't as important as informing about other stuff like being HIV positive, it still seems relatively important to enough people that their rights should be respected too.

@Wizard32 thoughts? ngl...
I'm secure enough in my masculinity and heterosexuality to discuss topics like this.
Those who cannot are insecure little boys.

Adult men who don't want to engage in conversations about certain muscle groups will simply ignore the thread.
Closeted faggots who feel triggered by the conversation will overcompensate by complaining about needing a safe space.

Guy asses look completely different from girl asses. We have completely different pelvic structures.

I'm attracted to a shapely pair of calf muscles on a foid, but that doesn't make it homoerotic to discuss building my own calf muscles (much like Arnold did) to impress a foid who is disgusted by twig-legs.

Homosexuality leads to AIDS, hemorrhoid, and rectal incontinence.
Its an unnatural perversion and against nature's way of procreation.
Niggers/Druggies also lead to AIDS, it is a broader problem of the spread of HIV via unprotected sex and needle-sharing. The correlation with fags is threefold:
  • 1) they have more unprotected sex because they don't need condoms to stop pregnancy
  • 2) they are unmitigated thrillseekers more motivated to abuse drugs to cope with being outcasts
  • 3) anal tissue probably bleeds more easily to accept the HIV virus more easily than vaginal tissue (lack of lubrication, etc)

So there is a strong correlation based on overall habits, but no absolute guarantee.

The hemorrhoid/rectal incontinence thing is also anal-sex related, and we would also see that in foids who take it up the ass. It wouldn't be an issue to fags who just want to give each other handjobs, and if guys want to do that instead of orbiting foids, it decreases foid SMV which will make the foid more likely to settle for sex with me, so why should I complain?

"Against nature's way of procreation" also applies to fucking a foid vagina wearing a condom, fucking a foid taking BC pills, fucking an infertile foid, fucking a pregnant foid, fucking a foid after a vasectomy, foids giving us handjobs, foids giving us blowjobs, foids giving us thighjobs, foids giving us hairjobs, foids giving us footjobs, voids giving us pitjobs, etc.

Unless the only type of sex you think should be had is unprotected vaginal sex between a fertile man and fertile woman, that isn't a basis of objection to faggots.

There's probably stronger grounds in a "think of the children" objection to homosexuality, since sexuality can be influenced by nurture/grooming/indoctrination. That would be the basis on which I wouldn't want to have faggots involved in the lives of vulnerable minors, because I wouldn't want to be buying diapers or anti-HIV drugs for my teenage son.

Subtle tranny subversion, a large problem for all incel or niche online communities in general.
MTF trannys still have male pelvic structures. Despite all the estrogen they take, they can't emulate female pelvis. They are as ugly as those weird foids which sometimes have male-ish bone structure.

This is also why FTM trannies still seem kinda fuckable as long as they don't grow a beard or some shit, because you know their body is female regardless of how the injected test is fucking with it.

JFL. Imagine caring about other men.
What would you say the motive of creating this forum is, then?

Caring about other men doesn't have to be for it's own sake. I see it as like collective bargaining, or idea-sharing to refine our own ideas under intelligent criticism.

ScornedStoic said:
Gays are fine, I just don't want them here.
Another one dirty fag exposed
If I say "currycels are fine, I just don't want them here" it wouldn't mean I want to fuck a currycel, so I'm not following your logic.

Gay guys=less competition for us
That's largely been my attitude, although it does mean more guys trying to rape me if I go to prison, so I don't like that end of the equation.

Another concern is how it can compromise homosocial bonding. IE you can't just do wrestling/MMA worry-free because you have to wonder if the guy might be groping your ass for sexual purposes insetad of sport purposes. I think that's one of the main reasons striking went ahead of grappling for so long.

Faggots = AIDS, literally
No, there is just a very strong correlation, as explained above. Faggots could prevent HIV transmission by just giving each other handjobs instead of poopering each other, but they elevate bathing their dicks in feces to a greater important to remaining virus-free, so they don't.

This reckless attitude is a much wider problem, and also correlates with other high-risk behaviors like using drugs, sharing needles, and riding motorcycles without a helmet.

While PART of that would be just due to being social outcasts, that doesn't mean there isn't an inherant problem independent of that worth looking into.

I remember someone recently posted about being a tranny
and be was swiftly banned permanently and the thread deleted.
I think mods are doing fine
*he?

Does that mean it was a FtM or an MtF? Do you remember username?

Both are against the rules I think (biological females pretending to be males are banned, biological males pretending to be females are banned) but it's still interesting to note.

I don't even understand what a gay man would be doing here, since even Blackops2cel can get plenty of matches on gay dating apps.
My first instinct is to think about how we sometimes fetishize lesbians and want to infiltrate their communities, and that maybe gays might be attracted to same-sex heteros in the same way that heteros are attracted to opposite-sex gays?

One factor of that doesn't line up. A big appeal in lesbians is the hope they haven't taken cock so are basically virgins (because lesbian sex is not real sex). This of course is bluepilled cope (most lesbians have taken cock, so at best you're hoping they've just taken LESS cock, but many "lesbians" have taken more cock than some straight girls with sexual morals) but it influences people the same.

The reason the factor doesn't line up is because gays obviously wouldn't have the disgust for their partner having been "corrupted" by competing members, since they are already the same sex to begin with.

So I think the real factor is more like the "thrill of conversion" like "I am the one who influenced them to change their ways, aren't I special?" being the leading factor of such an appeal.

I legit saw a thread where a guy was advocating every man neutering themselves and turning themselves into "Bromosexuals"
That almost sounds like a joke thread. Was it about vasectomy or something more extreme like castration or penile amputation?

Can you explain again how gays affect our inceldom negatively other than having to put out with their potential public shit?
TBH a big reason shit like pride parades or fags frenching each other on public streets don't bother me is that I don't go out in public much to begin with, so I've never actually witnessed it in person.

I can see for people who are more social and less hikki than me (are you sure you are incel though?) how it would be much more irritating since you'd actually encounter it on places other than TV where you can easily fast-forward past it.

Actually as an incel you should encourage homosexuality ..
cuz its lower alot of man from the competion on females ..
One flaw I see in this argument is that even homosexual men still fulfill a lot of women's needs, like the need for companionship/friendship, the need to provide a shoulder to cry on, the need to have someone to whine to about Chad, someone to carry your heavy boxes, etc.

Fags provide this service to faghags I guess because they get off to hearing about how Chad fucks her, making them the perfect orbiters.

This makes them de-value heterosexual orbiters, which is a bad thing if it decreases their likelihood of getting sex from the foid, but maybe a good thing if it's harsh enough to stop them orbiting altogether.

A foid gets needier the fewer orbiters she has, so eventually a fag might get tired of her if she relies on him too heavily (like if she stops fucking Chad altogether and hopelessly tries to convert the fag) but he'll probably just go orbit some other foid so the problem still exists.
 
*trannies
Y'know that's weird, singular is tranny, why do we change Y to IE? Is that a universal rule?
The double-consonant is must though, otherwise it would sound like "train".

I'm against the policies of the Democratic Party liberals of the United States, and Trudeau's Liberal Party of Canada, but I believe those to be corrupted versions of liberalism and I don't consider myself anti-liberal in general.

Liberalism can be a broad idea and "protecting and enhancing individual freedom" is at it's core message, a good idea to me. I want to freedom to play whatever vidya I want, read whatever comics I want, etc.

Where liberalism goes astray is basically they take protecting SOME GROUPS (ie homosexuals/transexuals/women) freedoms as such a priority that it begins to encroach upon others' freedoms.

I would say I'm an egalitarian-liberal in that I'm for protecting freedom so long as it doesn't inhibit others' freedom. The central problem is non-egalitarian liberal policies. Shit like thinking it's so important to protect a tranny's right to be considered a gender that they don't care about protecting someone else's right to make an informed choice about who they fuck, and basically legalize rape against tranny's partners through deception regarding gender.

While I realize that informing a partner about your birth sex isn't as important as informing about other stuff like being HIV positive, it still seems relatively important to enough people that their rights should be respected too.


I'm secure enough in my masculinity and heterosexuality to discuss topics like this.
Those who cannot are insecure little boys.

Adult men who don't want to engage in conversations about certain muscle groups will simply ignore the thread.
Closeted faggots who feel triggered by the conversation will overcompensate by complaining about needing a safe space.

Guy asses look completely different from girl asses. We have completely different pelvic structures.

I'm attracted to a shapely pair of calf muscles on a foid, but that doesn't make it homoerotic to discuss building my own calf muscles (much like Arnold did) to impress a foid who is disgusted by twig-legs.


Niggers/Druggies also lead to AIDS, it is a broader problem of the spread of HIV via unprotected sex and needle-sharing. The correlation with fags is threefold:
  • 1) they have more unprotected sex because they don't need condoms to stop pregnancy
  • 2) they are unmitigated thrillseekers more motivated to abuse drugs to cope with being outcasts
  • 3) anal tissue probably bleeds more easily to accept the HIV virus more easily than vaginal tissue (lack of lubrication, etc)

So there is a strong correlation based on overall habits, but no absolute guarantee.

The hemorrhoid/rectal incontinence thing is also anal-sex related, and we would also see that in foids who take it up the ass. It wouldn't be an issue to fags who just want to give each other handjobs, and if guys want to do that instead of orbiting foids, it decreases foid SMV which will make the foid more likely to settle for sex with me, so why should I complain?

"Against nature's way of procreation" also applies to fucking a foid vagina wearing a condom, fucking a foid taking BC pills, fucking an infertile foid, fucking a pregnant foid, fucking a foid after a vasectomy, foids giving us handjobs, foids giving us blowjobs, foids giving us thighjobs, foids giving us hairjobs, foids giving us footjobs, voids giving us pitjobs, etc.

Unless the only type of sex you think should be had is unprotected vaginal sex between a fertile man and fertile woman, that isn't a basis of objection to faggots.

There's probably stronger grounds in a "think of the children" objection to homosexuality, since sexuality can be influenced by nurture/grooming/indoctrination. That would be the basis on which I wouldn't want to have faggots involved in the lives of vulnerable minors, because I wouldn't want to be buying diapers or anti-HIV drugs for my teenage son.


MTF trannys still have male pelvic structures. Despite all the estrogen they take, they can't emulate female pelvis. They are as ugly as those weird foids which sometimes have male-ish bone structure.

This is also why FTM trannies still seem kinda fuckable as long as they don't grow a beard or some shit, because you know their body is female regardless of how the injected test is fucking with it.


What would you say the motive of creating this forum is, then?

Caring about other men doesn't have to be for it's own sake. I see it as like collective bargaining, or idea-sharing to refine our own ideas under intelligent criticism.


If I say "currycels are fine, I just don't want them here" it wouldn't mean I want to fuck a currycel, so I'm not following your logic.


That's largely been my attitude, although it does mean more guys trying to rape me if I go to prison, so I don't like that end of the equation.

Another concern is how it can compromise homosocial bonding. IE you can't just do wrestling/MMA worry-free because you have to wonder if the guy might be groping your ass for sexual purposes insetad of sport purposes. I think that's one of the main reasons striking went ahead of grappling for so long.


No, there is just a very strong correlation, as explained above. Faggots could prevent HIV transmission by just giving each other handjobs instead of poopering each other, but they elevate bathing their dicks in feces to a greater important to remaining virus-free, so they don't.

This reckless attitude is a much wider problem, and also correlates with other high-risk behaviors like using drugs, sharing needles, and riding motorcycles without a helmet.

While PART of that would be just due to being social outcasts, that doesn't mean there isn't an inherant problem independent of that worth looking into.


*he?

Does that mean it was a FtM or an MtF? Do you remember username?

Both are against the rules I think (biological females pretending to be males are banned, biological males pretending to be females are banned) but it's still interesting to note.


My first instinct is to think about how we sometimes fetishize lesbians and want to infiltrate their communities, and that maybe gays might be attracted to same-sex heteros in the same way that heteros are attracted to opposite-sex gays?

One factor of that doesn't line up. A big appeal in lesbians is the hope they haven't taken cock so are basically virgins (because lesbian sex is not real sex). This of course is bluepilled cope (most lesbians have taken cock, so at best you're hoping they've just taken LESS cock, but many "lesbians" have taken more cock than some straight girls with sexual morals) but it influences people the same.

The reason the factor doesn't line up is because gays obviously wouldn't have the disgust for their partner having been "corrupted" by competing members, since they are already the same sex to begin with.

So I think the real factor is more like the "thrill of conversion" like "I am the one who influenced them to change their ways, aren't I special?" being the leading factor of such an appeal.


That almost sounds like a joke thread. Was it about vasectomy or something more extreme like castration or penile amputation?


TBH a big reason shit like pride parades or fags frenching each other on public streets don't bother me is that I don't go out in public much to begin with, so I've never actually witnessed it in person.

I can see for people who are more social and less hikki than me (are you sure you are incel though?) how it would be much more irritating since you'd actually encounter it on places other than TV where you can easily fast-forward past it.


One flaw I see in this argument is that even homosexual men still fulfill a lot of women's needs, like the need for companionship/friendship, the need to provide a shoulder to cry on, the need to have someone to whine to about Chad, someone to carry your heavy boxes, etc.

Fags provide this service to faghags I guess because they get off to hearing about how Chad fucks her, making them the perfect orbiters.

This makes them de-value heterosexual orbiters, which is a bad thing if it decreases their likelihood of getting sex from the foid, but maybe a good thing if it's harsh enough to stop them orbiting altogether.

A foid gets needier the fewer orbiters she has, so eventually a fag might get tired of her if she relies on him too heavily (like if she stops fucking Chad altogether and hopelessly tries to convert the fag) but he'll probably just go orbit some other foid so the problem still exists.
I gave you Reddit gold for that one
 
*trannies
Y'know that's weird, singular is tranny, why do we change Y to IE? Is that a universal rule?
The double-consonant is must though, otherwise it would sound like "train".

I'm against the policies of the Democratic Party liberals of the United States, and Trudeau's Liberal Party of Canada, but I believe those to be corrupted versions of liberalism and I don't consider myself anti-liberal in general.

Liberalism can be a broad idea and "protecting and enhancing individual freedom" is at it's core message, a good idea to me. I want to freedom to play whatever vidya I want, read whatever comics I want, etc.

Where liberalism goes astray is basically they take protecting SOME GROUPS (ie homosexuals/transexuals/women) freedoms as such a priority that it begins to encroach upon others' freedoms.

I would say I'm an egalitarian-liberal in that I'm for protecting freedom so long as it doesn't inhibit others' freedom. The central problem is non-egalitarian liberal policies. Shit like thinking it's so important to protect a tranny's right to be considered a gender that they don't care about protecting someone else's right to make an informed choice about who they fuck, and basically legalize rape against tranny's partners through deception regarding gender.

While I realize that informing a partner about your birth sex isn't as important as informing about other stuff like being HIV positive, it still seems relatively important to enough people that their rights should be respected too.


I'm secure enough in my masculinity and heterosexuality to discuss topics like this.
Those who cannot are insecure little boys.

Adult men who don't want to engage in conversations about certain muscle groups will simply ignore the thread.
Closeted faggots who feel triggered by the conversation will overcompensate by complaining about needing a safe space.

Guy asses look completely different from girl asses. We have completely different pelvic structures.

I'm attracted to a shapely pair of calf muscles on a foid, but that doesn't make it homoerotic to discuss building my own calf muscles (much like Arnold did) to impress a foid who is disgusted by twig-legs.


Niggers/Druggies also lead to AIDS, it is a broader problem of the spread of HIV via unprotected sex and needle-sharing. The correlation with fags is threefold:
  • 1) they have more unprotected sex because they don't need condoms to stop pregnancy
  • 2) they are unmitigated thrillseekers more motivated to abuse drugs to cope with being outcasts
  • 3) anal tissue probably bleeds more easily to accept the HIV virus more easily than vaginal tissue (lack of lubrication, etc)

So there is a strong correlation based on overall habits, but no absolute guarantee.

The hemorrhoid/rectal incontinence thing is also anal-sex related, and we would also see that in foids who take it up the ass. It wouldn't be an issue to fags who just want to give each other handjobs, and if guys want to do that instead of orbiting foids, it decreases foid SMV which will make the foid more likely to settle for sex with me, so why should I complain?

"Against nature's way of procreation" also applies to fucking a foid vagina wearing a condom, fucking a foid taking BC pills, fucking an infertile foid, fucking a pregnant foid, fucking a foid after a vasectomy, foids giving us handjobs, foids giving us blowjobs, foids giving us thighjobs, foids giving us hairjobs, foids giving us footjobs, voids giving us pitjobs, etc.

Unless the only type of sex you think should be had is unprotected vaginal sex between a fertile man and fertile woman, that isn't a basis of objection to faggots.

There's probably stronger grounds in a "think of the children" objection to homosexuality, since sexuality can be influenced by nurture/grooming/indoctrination. That would be the basis on which I wouldn't want to have faggots involved in the lives of vulnerable minors, because I wouldn't want to be buying diapers or anti-HIV drugs for my teenage son.


MTF trannys still have male pelvic structures. Despite all the estrogen they take, they can't emulate female pelvis. They are as ugly as those weird foids which sometimes have male-ish bone structure.

This is also why FTM trannies still seem kinda fuckable as long as they don't grow a beard or some shit, because you know their body is female regardless of how the injected test is fucking with it.


What would you say the motive of creating this forum is, then?

Caring about other men doesn't have to be for it's own sake. I see it as like collective bargaining, or idea-sharing to refine our own ideas under intelligent criticism.


If I say "currycels are fine, I just don't want them here" it wouldn't mean I want to fuck a currycel, so I'm not following your logic.


That's largely been my attitude, although it does mean more guys trying to rape me if I go to prison, so I don't like that end of the equation.

Another concern is how it can compromise homosocial bonding. IE you can't just do wrestling/MMA worry-free because you have to wonder if the guy might be groping your ass for sexual purposes insetad of sport purposes. I think that's one of the main reasons striking went ahead of grappling for so long.


No, there is just a very strong correlation, as explained above. Faggots could prevent HIV transmission by just giving each other handjobs instead of poopering each other, but they elevate bathing their dicks in feces to a greater important to remaining virus-free, so they don't.

This reckless attitude is a much wider problem, and also correlates with other high-risk behaviors like using drugs, sharing needles, and riding motorcycles without a helmet.

While PART of that would be just due to being social outcasts, that doesn't mean there isn't an inherant problem independent of that worth looking into.


*he?

Does that mean it was a FtM or an MtF? Do you remember username?

Both are against the rules I think (biological females pretending to be males are banned, biological males pretending to be females are banned) but it's still interesting to note.


My first instinct is to think about how we sometimes fetishize lesbians and want to infiltrate their communities, and that maybe gays might be attracted to same-sex heteros in the same way that heteros are attracted to opposite-sex gays?

One factor of that doesn't line up. A big appeal in lesbians is the hope they haven't taken cock so are basically virgins (because lesbian sex is not real sex). This of course is bluepilled cope (most lesbians have taken cock, so at best you're hoping they've just taken LESS cock, but many "lesbians" have taken more cock than some straight girls with sexual morals) but it influences people the same.

The reason the factor doesn't line up is because gays obviously wouldn't have the disgust for their partner having been "corrupted" by competing members, since they are already the same sex to begin with.

So I think the real factor is more like the "thrill of conversion" like "I am the one who influenced them to change their ways, aren't I special?" being the leading factor of such an appeal.


That almost sounds like a joke thread. Was it about vasectomy or something more extreme like castration or penile amputation?


TBH a big reason shit like pride parades or fags frenching each other on public streets don't bother me is that I don't go out in public much to begin with, so I've never actually witnessed it in person.

I can see for people who are more social and less hikki than me (are you sure you are incel though?) how it would be much more irritating since you'd actually encounter it on places other than TV where you can easily fast-forward past it.


One flaw I see in this argument is that even homosexual men still fulfill a lot of women's needs, like the need for companionship/friendship, the need to provide a shoulder to cry on, the need to have someone to whine to about Chad, someone to carry your heavy boxes, etc.

Fags provide this service to faghags I guess because they get off to hearing about how Chad fucks her, making them the perfect orbiters.

This makes them de-value heterosexual orbiters, which is a bad thing if it decreases their likelihood of getting sex from the foid, but maybe a good thing if it's harsh enough to stop them orbiting altogether.

A foid gets needier the fewer orbiters she has, so eventually a fag might get tired of her if she relies on him too heavily (like if she stops fucking Chad altogether and hopelessly tries to convert the fag) but he'll probably just go orbit some other foid so the problem still exists.
Hqdefault
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

antisocialcel
Replies
14
Views
1K
m3nt4Lbl0ck3d
m3nt4Lbl0ck3d
caineturbat2003
Replies
11
Views
940
Emba
Emba
Stupid Clown
Replies
84
Views
4K
Oneitiscel
Oneitiscel
blackpillednigga
Replies
35
Views
1K
Jealous Freak
Jealous Freak

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top