Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

LifeFuel Today I unleashed my rage on a normie cuck for denying the blackpill

Last2025cel

Last2025cel

AMerican hERo
★★★★
Joined
Dec 31, 2025
Posts
1,868
Online time
1d 9h
Last Thursday, the professor let me and four other people stay after class by ourselves to work on a project because he had to leave for a meeting. My friend is an MTN (about 6/10, 6'0", white, but turbo-ND) who's been looksmaxing since 2023 and him and this other guy (about 3/10, 5'9", of SEA descent) were talking about looksmaxing, it was their first time talking and it was going well until this bluepilled cuck "male feminist" (about 4/10, 5'8", white) (who's also a student, NOT the professor, in case it's not clear enough) decided to insert himself into the conversation and started asking my friend questions about looksmaxing in an aggressive tone. He asked him why he does it and my friend said it's to get treated better by people, since he got bullied a lot in his childhood, and to increase his chances of getting a girlfriend. Then the cuck goes all in and laughs in his face telling him that he's obsessed with his looks and how his mentality is why he got bullied.

The whole "debate" went on for almost an hour an I don't remember everything he said but it was just strawman after strawman and a lot of cherrypicking on his part, all while talking over us and not letting us finish. His whole argument was basically ":soy:BUT NOT ALL WOMEN ARE HYPERGAMOUS BRO", ":soy:BUT MANY WOMEN ACTUALLY PREFER SHORT GUYS BRO", as well as the good old ":soy:JUST GO OUTSIDE AND TALK TO PEOPLE BRO" Whenever we debunked one of his bullshit non-arguments he would come up with another one in seconds and it went on until it was time for us to leave.

He brought up some rich midget actor (forgot his name) who's married and how ":soy:IT DISRPOVES YOUR WHOLE POINT BRO". In his mind as long as there's one short/ugly guy with a girlfriend then it disproves the entirety of the blackpill. Normies can only think in absolutes, either all ugly men can get girlfriends or none of them can. No inbetween and no nuance.

I tried to steer the discussion away from foids and relationships in general towards how ugly men are treated worse in other aspects of life as well as them being more likely to get bullied. I told him about my friend who tried to commit suicide after being bullied by foids and their simps in high school at which he laughed and said that he probably did something to deserve it.

At that point I had so much rage built up inside me that I got up and yelled at him and told him how he's a privileged brat who's had everything handed to him and never had to experience inceldom (I think I might've overrated his face a bit) and the he flips the script on us and says that he didn't have any friends until college and that he's never had a girlfriend either but it's his fault because he's not good enough and women don't owe him anything. He would make a perfect IT member with that mentality. He also said that he doesn't want to have a girlfriend because he has "internalized harmful gender norms" (his words, not mine JFL :feelskek:) and he's afraid he would hurt her. What a fucking cuck.

To add to he irony, my friend, whom he was arguing with has first hand experience of how differently people treat you when you're a 3/10 vs 6/10 and how now he gets some positive attention from foids (although he still hasn't ascended), when before foids either made fun of him or ignored him, while the cuck was a solid 2 or 3 SMV points below him trying to lecture him on how looks don't matter.
 
Last edited:
The professor is a cuck. It was a waste of time debating him.
 
The professor is a cuck. It was a waste of time debating him.
The professor had to leave for a meeting and wasn't the one debating. It was another student.
 
The professor had to leave for a meeting and wasn't the one debating. It was another student.
Oh ok, still a waste of time debating the other student.
 
Last Thursday, the professor let me and four other people stay after class by ourselves to work on a project because he had to leave for a meeting. My friend is an MTN (about 6/10, 6'0", white, but turbo-ND) who's been looksmaxing since 2023 and him and this other guy (about 3/10, 5'9", of SEA descent) were talking about looksmaxing, it was their first time talking and it was going well until this bluepilled cuck "male feminist" (about 4/10, 5'8", white) (who's also a student, NOT the professor, in case it's not clear enough) decided to insert himself into the conversation and started asking my friend questions about looksmaxing in an aggressive tone. He asked him why he does it and my friend said it's to get treated better by people, since he got bullied a lot in his childhood, and to increase his chances of getting a girlfriend. Then the cuck goes all in and laughs in his face telling him that he's obsessed with his looks and how his mentality is why he got bullied.

The whole "debate" went on for almost an hour an I don't remember everything he said but it was just strawman after strawman and a lot of cherrypicking on his part, all while talking over us and not letting us finish. His whole argument was basically ":soy:BUT NOT ALL WOMEN ARE HYPERGAMOUS BRO", ":soy:BUT MANY WOMEN ACTUALLY PREFER SHORT GUYS BRO", as well as the good old ":soy:JUST GO OUTSIDE AND TALK TO PEOPLE BRO" Whenever we debunked one of his bullshit non-arguments he would come up with another one in seconds and it went on until it was time for us to leave.

He brought up some rich midget actor (forgot his name) who's married and how ":soy:IT DISRPOVES YOUR WHOLE POINT BRO". In his mind as long as there's one short/ugly guy with a girlfriend then it disproves the entirety of the blackpill. Normies can only think in absolutes, either all ugly men can get girlfriends or none of them can. No inbetween and no nuance.

I tried to steer the discussion away from foids and relationships in general towards how ugly men are treated worse in other aspects of life as well as them being more likely to get bullied. I told him about my friend who tried to commit suicide after being bullied by foids and their simps in high school at which he laughed and said that he probably did something to deserve it.

At that point I had so much rage built up inside me that I got up and yelled at him and told him how he's a privileged brat who's had everything handed to him and never had to experience inceldom (I think I might've overrated his face a bit) and the he flips the script on us and says that he didn't have any friends until college and that he's never had a girlfriend either but it's his fault because he's not good enough and women don't owe him anything. He would make a perfect IT member with that mentality. He also said that he doesn't want to have a girlfriend because he has "internalized harmful gender norms" (his words, not mine JFL :feelskek:) and he's afraid he would hurt her. What a fucking cuck.

To add to he irony, my friend, whom he was arguing with has first hand experience of how differently people treat you when you're a 3/10 vs 6/10 and how now he gets some positive attention from foids (although he still hasn't ascended), when before foids either made fun of him or ignored him, while the cuck was a solid 2 or 3 SMV points below him trying to lecture him on how looks don't matter.
normfag extinction button NOW
 
Oh ok, still a waste of time debating the other student.
I mean, realistically what else could we have done? He's the one who inserted himself into their conversation and tried to antagonize us.
 
just-world fallacy is a mental disorder
 
He's gonna end up as a faggot or a troon in no time
 
I told him about my friend who tried to commit suicide after being bullied by foids and their simps in high school at which he laughed and said that he probably did something to deserve it.

Average foid worshipper. He calls all men bad and all women good . He is a male feminist. He is a gender traitor . He betrays his own gender just for some female validation. He is a misandrist.
 
Last edited:
this is why bluepilled normiefags deserve to die a horrible death
 
just-world fallacy is a mental disorder
He's a young naive college student, he'll learn how brutal this life will be. But probably not since he's a fooking Normie. Privileged fuck.
 
He's a young naive college student, he'll learn how brutal this life will be. But probably not since he's a fooking Normie. Privileged fuck.
From what he said he's already experienced loneliness and yet he's still in denial
 
From what he said he's already experienced loneliness and yet he's still in denial
He knows nothing of loneliness, he merely adopted the loneliness but we were born in it
 
Then the cuck goes all in and laughs in his face telling him that he's obsessed with his looks and how his mentality is why he got bullied.
1771830616542
 
Feminists deserve to get beat up by a FEMALE boxer
 
Should have punched this faggot in the face with a brass knuckles
 
You hit the nail on the head. Normies are incredibly stupid and incapable of any nuance, either all short men can get girlfriends or none of them can.

It's crazy this guy was actually an incel himself yet refuses to believe the facts
 
You made the mistake of arguing with mentally deranged idiots. And you even got emotional about it.
Next time, laugh at that jerk and tell him: "Show me your hot girlfriend first, you pathetic cuck. You're an incel just like us, despite your mentality, you clown. Now go back to reddit and simp for some ugly feminist landwhale"
 
Actually, pathetic cucks like him should rope, not us.
 
You made the mistake of arguing with mentally deranged idiots. And you even got emotional about it.
Next time, laugh at that jerk and tell him: "Show me your hot girlfriend first, you pathetic cuck. You're an incel just like us, despite your mentality, you clown. Now go back to reddit and simp for some ugly feminist landwhale"
 
Last Thursday, the professor let me and four other people stay after class by ourselves to work on a project because he had to leave for a meeting. My friend is an MTN (about 6/10, 6'0", white, but turbo-ND) who's been looksmaxing since 2023 and him and this other guy (about 3/10, 5'9", of SEA descent) were talking about looksmaxing, it was their first time talking and it was going well until this bluepilled cuck "male feminist" (about 4/10, 5'8", white) (who's also a student, NOT the professor, in case it's not clear enough) decided to insert himself into the conversation and started asking my friend questions about looksmaxing in an aggressive tone. He asked him why he does it and my friend said it's to get treated better by people, since he got bullied a lot in his childhood, and to increase his chances of getting a girlfriend. Then the cuck goes all in and laughs in his face telling him that he's obsessed with his looks and how his mentality is why he got bullied.

The whole "debate" went on for almost an hour an I don't remember everything he said but it was just strawman after strawman and a lot of cherrypicking on his part, all while talking over us and not letting us finish. His whole argument was basically ":soy:BUT NOT ALL WOMEN ARE HYPERGAMOUS BRO", ":soy:BUT MANY WOMEN ACTUALLY PREFER SHORT GUYS BRO", as well as the good old ":soy:JUST GO OUTSIDE AND TALK TO PEOPLE BRO" Whenever we debunked one of his bullshit non-arguments he would come up with another one in seconds and it went on until it was time for us to leave.

He brought up some rich midget actor (forgot his name) who's married and how ":soy:IT DISRPOVES YOUR WHOLE POINT BRO". In his mind as long as there's one short/ugly guy with a girlfriend then it disproves the entirety of the blackpill. Normies can only think in absolutes, either all ugly men can get girlfriends or none of them can. No inbetween and no nuance.

I tried to steer the discussion away from foids and relationships in general towards how ugly men are treated worse in other aspects of life as well as them being more likely to get bullied. I told him about my friend who tried to commit suicide after being bullied by foids and their simps in high school at which he laughed and said that he probably did something to deserve it.

At that point I had so much rage built up inside me that I got up and yelled at him and told him how he's a privileged brat who's had everything handed to him and never had to experience inceldom (I think I might've overrated his face a bit) and the he flips the script on us and says that he didn't have any friends until college and that he's never had a girlfriend either but it's his fault because he's not good enough and women don't owe him anything. He would make a perfect IT member with that mentality. He also said that he doesn't want to have a girlfriend because he has "internalized harmful gender norms" (his words, not mine JFL :feelskek:) and he's afraid he would hurt her. What a fucking cuck.

To add to he irony, my friend, whom he was arguing with has first hand experience of how differently people treat you when you're a 3/10 vs 6/10 and how now he gets some positive attention from foids (although he still hasn't ascended), when before foids either made fun of him or ignored him, while the cuck was a solid 2 or 3 SMV points below him trying to lecture him on how looks don't matter.
death to all cucks
 
You hit the nail on the head. Normies are incredibly stupid and incapable of any nuance, either all short men can get girlfriends or none of them can.

It's crazy this guy was actually an incel himself yet refuses to believe the facts
It’s like they don’t understand what per capita is. That ugly men will be single far more often than chads.
“But look at this famous subhuman actor who’s got a 10/10 wife :soy:
Doesn’t matter you blue haired faggot.
 
Last Thursday, the professor let me and four other people stay after class by ourselves to work on a project because he had to leave for a meeting. My friend is an MTN (about 6/10, 6'0", white, but turbo-ND) who's been looksmaxing since 2023 and him and this other guy (about 3/10, 5'9", of SEA descent) were talking about looksmaxing, it was their first time talking and it was going well until this bluepilled cuck "male feminist" (about 4/10, 5'8", white) (who's also a student, NOT the professor, in case it's not clear enough) decided to insert himself into the conversation and started asking my friend questions about looksmaxing in an aggressive tone. He asked him why he does it and my friend said it's to get treated better by people, since he got bullied a lot in his childhood, and to increase his chances of getting a girlfriend. Then the cuck goes all in and laughs in his face telling him that he's obsessed with his looks and how his mentality is why he got bullied.

The whole "debate" went on for almost an hour an I don't remember everything he said but it was just strawman after strawman and a lot of cherrypicking on his part, all while talking over us and not letting us finish. His whole argument was basically ":soy:BUT NOT ALL WOMEN ARE HYPERGAMOUS BRO", ":soy:BUT MANY WOMEN ACTUALLY PREFER SHORT GUYS BRO", as well as the good old ":soy:JUST GO OUTSIDE AND TALK TO PEOPLE BRO" Whenever we debunked one of his bullshit non-arguments he would come up with another one in seconds and it went on until it was time for us to leave.

He brought up some rich midget actor (forgot his name) who's married and how ":soy:IT DISRPOVES YOUR WHOLE POINT BRO". In his mind as long as there's one short/ugly guy with a girlfriend then it disproves the entirety of the blackpill. Normies can only think in absolutes, either all ugly men can get girlfriends or none of them can. No inbetween and no nuance.

I tried to steer the discussion away from foids and relationships in general towards how ugly men are treated worse in other aspects of life as well as them being more likely to get bullied. I told him about my friend who tried to commit suicide after being bullied by foids and their simps in high school at which he laughed and said that he probably did something to deserve it.

At that point I had so much rage built up inside me that I got up and yelled at him and told him how he's a privileged brat who's had everything handed to him and never had to experience inceldom (I think I might've overrated his face a bit) and the he flips the script on us and says that he didn't have any friends until college and that he's never had a girlfriend either but it's his fault because he's not good enough and women don't owe him anything. He would make a perfect IT member with that mentality. He also said that he doesn't want to have a girlfriend because he has "internalized harmful gender norms" (his words, not mine JFL :feelskek:) and he's afraid he would hurt her. What a fucking cuck.

To add to he irony, my friend, whom he was arguing with has first hand experience of how differently people treat you when you're a 3/10 vs 6/10 and how now he gets some positive attention from foids (although he still hasn't ascended), when before foids either made fun of him or ignored him, while the cuck was a solid 2 or 3 SMV points below him trying to lecture him on how looks don't matter.
@grok summarize this
 
It’s like they don’t understand what per capita is. That ugly men will be single far more often than chads.
“But look at this famous subhuman actor who’s got a 10/10 wife :soy:
Doesn’t matter you blue haired faggot.
They also don't want to admit humans are shallow and that looks matter, because they'd then have to admit they are shallow themselves.
 
They also don't want to admit humans are shallow and that looks matter, because they'd then have to admit they are shallow themselves.
 
@grok summarize this
Ok.

Summary of the Incident (Last Thursday After-Class Debate)

A small group of five students (including the poster) stayed behind after class while the professor attended a meeting. The conversation started casually between the poster’s friend — a 6/10 white MTN (6’0”, turbo-neurodivergent, actively looksmaxing since 2023) — and another guy (3/10, 5’9”, SEA descent) about looksmaxing. It was their first real talk and was going smoothly until a self-described “male feminist” student (rated 4/10, 5’8”, white) aggressively inserted himself.


Core Argument & How It Unfolded
The feminist immediately challenged the friend on why he was looksmaxing. The friend answered honestly: he wanted better treatment from people (he had been heavily bullied as a child) and higher chances of getting a girlfriend. The feminist laughed in his face, accused him of being “obsessed with his looks,” and claimed that exact mentality was the reason he got bullied in the first place.


What followed was an hour-long, one-sided “debate” dominated by the feminist:


  • Constant interruptions and talking over everyone.
  • Rapid-fire strawmen and goalpost-moving whenever his points were countered.
  • Classic blue-pill talking points: “Not all women are hypergamous, bro,” “Many women actually prefer short guys, bro,” “Just go outside and talk to people, bro.”
  • Cherry-picked example: a rich midget actor who is married, used to “disprove the entire blackpill.” In his view, any single counter-example (one short/ugly guy with a girlfriend) invalidates the whole concept of looks mattering.

The poster tried to broaden the discussion beyond dating to how ugly men are treated worse in general (higher bullying rates, worse social outcomes). He mentioned a mutual friend who attempted suicide after brutal bullying by girls and their simps in high school. The feminist laughed and said the suicidal friend “probably deserved it.”


Climax & Role-Reversal
At that point the poster snapped, stood up, and yelled that the feminist was a privileged brat who had never experienced inceldom. The feminist immediately flipped the script: he claimed he had zero friends until college, has never had a girlfriend, and that it’s entirely his own fault because he’s “not good enough.” He added that women owe him nothing and that he actually doesn’t want a girlfriend anyway — because he has “internalized harmful gender norms” and is afraid he would hurt her. The poster described him as “a perfect IT member with that mentality.”


The Irony Highlighted
The friend being lectured has direct, first-hand before-and-after experience: as a former 3/10 he was mocked or ignored by women; after looksmaxing to 6/10 he now receives noticeably more positive attention (though he still hasn’t fully “ascended”). The feminist lecturing him was rated 2–3 SMV points lower, had zero personal success with women, and yet insisted looks and status don’t matter.


Overall Tone & Takeaway in the Post
The poster portrays the feminist as the textbook blue-pilled, normie thinker who operates in absolutes (“if even one ugly guy has a girlfriend, the blackpill is false”) while refusing to acknowledge nuance, statistics, or lived experience. The hour-long exchange is presented as a perfect microcosm of blackpill vs. bluepill clash: one side citing personal transformation and observable treatment differences, the other relying on moral platitudes, cherry-picked exceptions, and victim-blaming. The poster ends on the irony that the lower-SMV guy was trying to school the higher-SMV (post-looksmax) guy on a topic the latter had actually lived through.
 
Ok.

Summary of the Incident (Last Thursday After-Class Debate)

A small group of five students (including the poster) stayed behind after class while the professor attended a meeting. The conversation started casually between the poster’s friend — a 6/10 white MTN (6’0”, turbo-neurodivergent, actively looksmaxing since 2023) — and another guy (3/10, 5’9”, SEA descent) about looksmaxing. It was their first real talk and was going smoothly until a self-described “male feminist” student (rated 4/10, 5’8”, white) aggressively inserted himself.


Core Argument & How It Unfolded
The feminist immediately challenged the friend on why he was looksmaxing. The friend answered honestly: he wanted better treatment from people (he had been heavily bullied as a child) and higher chances of getting a girlfriend. The feminist laughed in his face, accused him of being “obsessed with his looks,” and claimed that exact mentality was the reason he got bullied in the first place.


What followed was an hour-long, one-sided “debate” dominated by the feminist:


  • Constant interruptions and talking over everyone.
  • Rapid-fire strawmen and goalpost-moving whenever his points were countered.
  • Classic blue-pill talking points: “Not all women are hypergamous, bro,” “Many women actually prefer short guys, bro,” “Just go outside and talk to people, bro.”
  • Cherry-picked example: a rich midget actor who is married, used to “disprove the entire blackpill.” In his view, any single counter-example (one short/ugly guy with a girlfriend) invalidates the whole concept of looks mattering.

The poster tried to broaden the discussion beyond dating to how ugly men are treated worse in general (higher bullying rates, worse social outcomes). He mentioned a mutual friend who attempted suicide after brutal bullying by girls and their simps in high school. The feminist laughed and said the suicidal friend “probably deserved it.”


Climax & Role-Reversal
At that point the poster snapped, stood up, and yelled that the feminist was a privileged brat who had never experienced inceldom. The feminist immediately flipped the script: he claimed he had zero friends until college, has never had a girlfriend, and that it’s entirely his own fault because he’s “not good enough.” He added that women owe him nothing and that he actually doesn’t want a girlfriend anyway — because he has “internalized harmful gender norms” and is afraid he would hurt her. The poster described him as “a perfect IT member with that mentality.”


The Irony Highlighted
The friend being lectured has direct, first-hand before-and-after experience: as a former 3/10 he was mocked or ignored by women; after looksmaxing to 6/10 he now receives noticeably more positive attention (though he still hasn’t fully “ascended”). The feminist lecturing him was rated 2–3 SMV points lower, had zero personal success with women, and yet insisted looks and status don’t matter.


Overall Tone & Takeaway in the Post
The poster portrays the feminist as the textbook blue-pilled, normie thinker who operates in absolutes (“if even one ugly guy has a girlfriend, the blackpill is false”) while refusing to acknowledge nuance, statistics, or lived experience. The hour-long exchange is presented as a perfect microcosm of blackpill vs. bluepill clash: one side citing personal transformation and observable treatment differences, the other relying on moral platitudes, cherry-picked exceptions, and victim-blaming. The poster ends on the irony that the lower-SMV guy was trying to school the higher-SMV (post-looksmax) guy on a topic the latter had actually lived through.
Bruh how is the summary the same length as the original text? :feelsbadman:
 
Ok.

Summary of the Incident (Last Thursday After-Class Debate)

A small group of five students (including the poster) stayed behind after class while the professor attended a meeting. The conversation started casually between the poster’s friend — a 6/10 white MTN (6’0”, turbo-neurodivergent, actively looksmaxing since 2023) — and another guy (3/10, 5’9”, SEA descent) about looksmaxing. It was their first real talk and was going smoothly until a self-described “male feminist” student (rated 4/10, 5’8”, white) aggressively inserted himself.


Core Argument & How It Unfolded
The feminist immediately challenged the friend on why he was looksmaxing. The friend answered honestly: he wanted better treatment from people (he had been heavily bullied as a child) and higher chances of getting a girlfriend. The feminist laughed in his face, accused him of being “obsessed with his looks,” and claimed that exact mentality was the reason he got bullied in the first place.


What followed was an hour-long, one-sided “debate” dominated by the feminist:


  • Constant interruptions and talking over everyone.
  • Rapid-fire strawmen and goalpost-moving whenever his points were countered.
  • Classic blue-pill talking points: “Not all women are hypergamous, bro,” “Many women actually prefer short guys, bro,” “Just go outside and talk to people, bro.”
  • Cherry-picked example: a rich midget actor who is married, used to “disprove the entire blackpill.” In his view, any single counter-example (one short/ugly guy with a girlfriend) invalidates the whole concept of looks mattering.

The poster tried to broaden the discussion beyond dating to how ugly men are treated worse in general (higher bullying rates, worse social outcomes). He mentioned a mutual friend who attempted suicide after brutal bullying by girls and their simps in high school. The feminist laughed and said the suicidal friend “probably deserved it.”


Climax & Role-Reversal
At that point the poster snapped, stood up, and yelled that the feminist was a privileged brat who had never experienced inceldom. The feminist immediately flipped the script: he claimed he had zero friends until college, has never had a girlfriend, and that it’s entirely his own fault because he’s “not good enough.” He added that women owe him nothing and that he actually doesn’t want a girlfriend anyway — because he has “internalized harmful gender norms” and is afraid he would hurt her. The poster described him as “a perfect IT member with that mentality.”


The Irony Highlighted
The friend being lectured has direct, first-hand before-and-after experience: as a former 3/10 he was mocked or ignored by women; after looksmaxing to 6/10 he now receives noticeably more positive attention (though he still hasn’t fully “ascended”). The feminist lecturing him was rated 2–3 SMV points lower, had zero personal success with women, and yet insisted looks and status don’t matter.


Overall Tone & Takeaway in the Post
The poster portrays the feminist as the textbook blue-pilled, normie thinker who operates in absolutes (“if even one ugly guy has a girlfriend, the blackpill is false”) while refusing to acknowledge nuance, statistics, or lived experience. The hour-long exchange is presented as a perfect microcosm of blackpill vs. bluepill clash: one side citing personal transformation and observable treatment differences, the other relying on moral platitudes, cherry-picked exceptions, and victim-blaming. The poster ends on the irony that the lower-SMV guy was trying to school the higher-SMV (post-looksmax) guy on a topic the latter had actually lived through.
Bruh how is the summary the same length as the original text? :feelsbadman:

Holy shit that "summary" is even longer than my actual post
 
":soy:JUST GO OUTSIDE AND TALK TO PEOPLE BRO"
You're telling me that you can literally be outside when debating with a normgroid, and they'll still use this as an argument...?
 
You're telling me that you can literally be outside when debating with a normgroid, and they'll still use this as an argument...?
They are delusional. What's funny is that he admitted he barely leaves his house except for school.
 
They are delusional. What's funny is that he admitted he barely leaves his house except for school.
I applaud you for the mental fortitude it must have taken to hear this retard speak for any longer than a few seconds and not go insane.
 
Last Thursday, the professor let me and four other people stay after class by ourselves to work on a project because he had to leave for a meeting. My friend is an MTN (about 6/10, 6'0", white, but turbo-ND) who's been looksmaxing since 2023 and him and this other guy (about 3/10, 5'9", of SEA descent) were talking about looksmaxing, it was their first time talking and it was going well until this bluepilled cuck "male feminist" (about 4/10, 5'8", white) (who's also a student, NOT the professor, in case it's not clear enough) decided to insert himself into the conversation and started asking my friend questions about looksmaxing in an aggressive tone. He asked him why he does it and my friend said it's to get treated better by people, since he got bullied a lot in his childhood, and to increase his chances of getting a girlfriend. Then the cuck goes all in and laughs in his face telling him that he's obsessed with his looks and how his mentality is why he got bullied.

The whole "debate" went on for almost an hour an I don't remember everything he said but it was just strawman after strawman and a lot of cherrypicking on his part, all while talking over us and not letting us finish. His whole argument was basically ":soy:BUT NOT ALL WOMEN ARE HYPERGAMOUS BRO", ":soy:BUT MANY WOMEN ACTUALLY PREFER SHORT GUYS BRO", as well as the good old ":soy:JUST GO OUTSIDE AND TALK TO PEOPLE BRO" Whenever we debunked one of his bullshit non-arguments he would come up with another one in seconds and it went on until it was time for us to leave.

He brought up some rich midget actor (forgot his name) who's married and how ":soy:IT DISRPOVES YOUR WHOLE POINT BRO". In his mind as long as there's one short/ugly guy with a girlfriend then it disproves the entirety of the blackpill. Normies can only think in absolutes, either all ugly men can get girlfriends or none of them can. No inbetween and no nuance.

I tried to steer the discussion away from foids and relationships in general towards how ugly men are treated worse in other aspects of life as well as them being more likely to get bullied. I told him about my friend who tried to commit suicide after being bullied by foids and their simps in high school at which he laughed and said that he probably did something to deserve it.

At that point I had so much rage built up inside me that I got up and yelled at him and told him how he's a privileged brat who's had everything handed to him and never had to experience inceldom (I think I might've overrated his face a bit) and the he flips the script on us and says that he didn't have any friends until college and that he's never had a girlfriend either but it's his fault because he's not good enough and women don't owe him anything. He would make a perfect IT member with that mentality. He also said that he doesn't want to have a girlfriend because he has "internalized harmful gender norms" (his words, not mine JFL :feelskek:) and he's afraid he would hurt her. What a fucking cuck.

To add to he irony, my friend, whom he was arguing with has first hand experience of how differently people treat you when you're a 3/10 vs 6/10 and how now he gets some positive attention from foids (although he still hasn't ascended), when before foids either made fun of him or ignored him, while the cuck was a solid 2 or 3 SMV points below him trying to lecture him on how looks don't matter.

You're talking about that guy from Game of Thrones aren't? I remember there was a video about him admitting that he knew women didn't like him because of his height despite another guy saying someone or that women in general liked him. He knew whoever said that was trying to butter him up and that women didn't actually look past his height. He was married to someone else with dwarfism.
 
You're talking about that guy from Game of Thrones aren't? I remember there was a video about him admitting that he knew women didn't like him because of his height despite another guy saying someone or that women in general liked him. He knew whoever said that was trying to butter him up and that women didn't actually look past his height. He was married to someone else with dwarfism.
Maybe, I have never heard of that actor before.
 
He also said that he doesn't want to have a girlfriend because he has "internalized harmful gender norms" (his words, not mine JFL :feelskek:) and he's afraid he would hurt her. What a fucking cuck.

Waste of time engaging anybody who talks like that, you'll never get anything through to him. You should never speak to it again. I've never even known someone who speaks like that irl, that's a special level of retardation.
 
Waste of time engaging anybody who talks like that, you'll never get anything through to him. You should never speak to it again. I've never even known someone who speaks like that irl, that's a special level of retardation.
He's a self-admitted Redditor who said he barely goes outside except for school (while telling me to go outside more JFL) and has the same annoying condescending tone as Hasan Piker (he probably watches him too).
 
Last Thursday, the professor let me and four other people stay after class by ourselves to work on a project because he had to leave for a meeting. My friend is an MTN (about 6/10, 6'0", white, but turbo-ND) who's been looksmaxing since 2023 and him and this other guy (about 3/10, 5'9", of SEA descent) were talking about looksmaxing, it was their first time talking and it was going well until this bluepilled cuck "male feminist" (about 4/10, 5'8", white) (who's also a student, NOT the professor, in case it's not clear enough) decided to insert himself into the conversation and started asking my friend questions about looksmaxing in an aggressive tone. He asked him why he does it and my friend said it's to get treated better by people, since he got bullied a lot in his childhood, and to increase his chances of getting a girlfriend. Then the cuck goes all in and laughs in his face telling him that he's obsessed with his looks and how his mentality is why he got bullied.

The whole "debate" went on for almost an hour an I don't remember everything he said but it was just strawman after strawman and a lot of cherrypicking on his part, all while talking over us and not letting us finish. His whole argument was basically ":soy:BUT NOT ALL WOMEN ARE HYPERGAMOUS BRO", ":soy:BUT MANY WOMEN ACTUALLY PREFER SHORT GUYS BRO", as well as the good old ":soy:JUST GO OUTSIDE AND TALK TO PEOPLE BRO" Whenever we debunked one of his bullshit non-arguments he would come up with another one in seconds and it went on until it was time for us to leave.

He brought up some rich midget actor (forgot his name) who's married and how ":soy:IT DISRPOVES YOUR WHOLE POINT BRO". In his mind as long as there's one short/ugly guy with a girlfriend then it disproves the entirety of the blackpill. Normies can only think in absolutes, either all ugly men can get girlfriends or none of them can. No inbetween and no nuance.

I tried to steer the discussion away from foids and relationships in general towards how ugly men are treated worse in other aspects of life as well as them being more likely to get bullied. I told him about my friend who tried to commit suicide after being bullied by foids and their simps in high school at which he laughed and said that he probably did something to deserve it.

At that point I had so much rage built up inside me that I got up and yelled at him and told him how he's a privileged brat who's had everything handed to him and never had to experience inceldom (I think I might've overrated his face a bit) and the he flips the script on us and says that he didn't have any friends until college and that he's never had a girlfriend either but it's his fault because he's not good enough and women don't owe him anything. He would make a perfect IT member with that mentality. He also said that he doesn't want to have a girlfriend because he has "internalized harmful gender norms" (his words, not mine JFL :feelskek:) and he's afraid he would hurt her. What a fucking cuck.

To add to he irony, my friend, whom he was arguing with has first hand experience of how differently people treat you when you're a 3/10 vs 6/10 and how now he gets some positive attention from foids (although he still hasn't ascended), when before foids either made fun of him or ignored him, while the cuck was a solid 2 or 3 SMV points below him trying to lecture him on how looks don't matter.
Well, that guy is clearly retarded. Idk why would ypu spend time to argue with him
 
Well, that guy is clearly retarded. Idk why would ypu spend time to argue with him
He started arguing with me and my friend. What was I supposed to do, ignore him?
 
He started arguing with me and my friend. What was I supposed to do, ignore him?
Just tell hum that hes wrong and dont go into details
 

Similar threads

Matrix0_
Replies
4
Views
272
Obanchito
Obanchito
NIGGA BANBAN
Replies
4
Views
897
Spooky_Heejin
Spooky_Heejin
andrej
Replies
1
Views
257
CroatianManlet2
CroatianManlet2
GSS9
Replies
13
Views
754
andrewphillips25082
andrewphillips25082
S
Replies
21
Views
2K
jo_yugislayer08
jo_yugislayer08

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top