Sam Vaknin makes some valid points, but his overall thesis runs counter to well-established evolutionary psychological theories that have been shown to be true. Women have innate attraction triggers that can't be fooled, hijacked, short-circuited, or manipulated in any way, despite what the slimiest, most used-car-salesman-y PUA will tell you. The stereotypical chad with chad traits (tall, broad-framed, muscular, chiselled jaw, hunter eyes, symmetric face etc.) are what triggers women's attraction (especially during their ovulation cycles) and makes their pussies tingly, wet, and screaming for chad cock to pump their itchy cunts with his seed.
Oofy doofy theory (ODT) seems to be a strictly Western phenomenon that women in gynocentric, matriarchal, feminist societies are socialized and conditioned towards. Naturally, however, their attraction - an uncontrollable and involuntary response - is for conventionally attractive males with status and money. There is an over-abundance of data points everywhere that shows this; you couldn't miss it if you were in a coma.
Recall Briffault's law. "The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place." It's clear that ODT refers to a phenomenon in societies where "women have it all," yet still seek males who must bring some value to the table for them. As Vaknin points out, this value is in their ability to completely dominate the male in the relationship. This is congruent with feminist goals of "overthrowing the patriarchy" (

) and taking over men's roles, thereby reversing the dominant-submissive roles in male-female dynamics. This is clearly consistent with ODT being socialized, not ingrained.