Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

LifeFuel Today i ate raw pork for the first time in my life

It was delicious, better than raw beef. It's been 30 minutes and i don't feel like the yersinia enterocolitica "bacteria" has taken over my intestines yet. If i get food poisoning i will never eat raw pork again, if i don't i will continue eating raw pork for the rest of my life. I will keep you updated on what happens. If i somehow get sick then i know it was shit quality meat.
Based and Aajonuspilled.

When I lived in Germany I ate Mett everyday. Raw pork is delicious. I’ve had raw chicken too... but I prefer beef, lamb, and fish.

I’ve been eating raw meat for 3 years now.
 
Well that's one way to cure your inceldom.
I will never be able to get a GF because i only eat raw meat, raw fat, raw eggs and raw dairy, it's just not my looks that's bad. GFs probably wants you to taste their homecooking and go to fancy restaurants where they serve cooked food. They will be heavily offended if you don't eat their homecooked meals or eat at restaurants and then they will dump you. I mean i could go to French restaurants since they serve raw meat there but i don't think they exist where i live.

It's probably the same with some normies and even Chads who are on this diet. They will eventually get dumped because they go against the norm when it comes to eating and reject their GFs cooking. Foids often love to cook food to their BFs to make them feel good about themselves so it's really an insult to reject their cooking. Sure Chad could probably get away with it and reject her food but she will still feel very insulted even if the chad explains that he's on a special diet.
 
Even if that was true it probably wasn't a very deep setting of water. More of a shallow lake setting where you waded through to find extra food. Such shallow lakes exist in the savannas of Africa during the rainy season.

Also many humans aren't good at swimming and any ingestion of water into the lungs can result in suffocation and death. Imo this goes against the idea that humans are natural adept in water or at least deeper water settings like seas and oceans.

We're much more adept in water than other apes in water though and we even quite like getting into it, as long as it's calm/warm.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhwgsQGgFio


Here are some apes "fishing" in a river. They won't ever go into the water itself as a human or human ancestor would as they can't swim and/or it's just not something they would like. They would get all their hair wet and bit of mud, vegatation and shit would stick to them. Humans being relatively hairless the water would just run and dry straight off.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBkHnrPu3a0



Also look at the faces here.

qdvds8fiseq7lcmvwjdj.jpg


photo-1515513284006-9a59075694b7


1611490294315



pexels-photo-614810.jpeg



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm-zWDaoCtI
 

Attachments

  • 1611490379574.jpeg
    1611490379574.jpeg
    7.4 KB · Views: 8
We're much more adept in water than other apes in water though and we even quite like getting into it, as long as it's calm/warm.
A lot of humans like getting near running water like streams though. It's more humans like getting into water as long as its clean and not freezing. Although a lot of humans that live in polar regions have taken a liking to the colder water.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhwgsQGgFio


Here are some apes "fishing" in a river. They won't ever go into the water itself as a human or human ancestor would as they can't swim and/or it's just not something they would like. They would get all their hair wet and bit of mud, vegatation and shit would stick to them. Humans being relatively hairless the water would just run and dry straight off.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBkHnrPu3a0

But again it's speculated humans lost their hair because of having to wander out in the sun more often as the closed forests fragmented and dried out giving way to savanna

That the relative hairlessness would be helpful for wading or swimming in water may have just been coincidence.

Again humans probably lost a lot of hair to keep from overheating in the more direct exposure of the sun in a more open forest/savanna setting. Also with less body hair there was less susceptibility to parasites living on the body and was possibly advantageous for signaling health and better suitability for mating.

The aquatic ape theory is very interesting but it doesn't have a lot of support.
 
A lot of humans like getting near running water like streams though. It's more humans like getting into water as long as its clean and not freezing. Although a lot of humans that live in polar regions have taken a liking to the colder water.

But again it's speculated humans lost their hair because of having to wander out in the sun more often as the closed forests fragmented and dried out giving way to savanna

That the relative hairlessness would be helpful for wading or swimming in water may have just been coincidence.

Again humans probably lost a lot of hair to keep from overheating in the more direct exposure of the sun in a more open forest/savanna setting. Also with less body hair there was less susceptibility to parasites living on the body and was possibly advantageous for signaling health and better suitability for mating.

The aquatic ape theory is very interesting but it doesn't have a lot of support.

Here's an observation I have made personally, I'm not sure if anyone else has noticed this.

9ab170504ef57d8e2b2e7428bf5aae15.png


The human body if you compare it to a chimp aside from being bipedal is streamlined, it's a much more appropriate body shape for moving through water. Any animal that adapts itself to water will possess streamlining.

image.jpg


The first bipedal primates didn't possess the same streamlining humans have they were much more like chimps in body proportion, as in not appropriate for water. They didn't really go into water at all so there was no need for them to be. So I definitely think there's some truth it, humans are a water loving species of ape we started getting immersed into it at some stage.

rGvSMY0tJqMBnxLyyPVDmVxh8RuU4eqRvI3BIQNfQPl9H38nRp4Ws22JAHQFrPsYolbX26Qkl0F3PoKOFF8a3mAO0l1ZAYy9XEzBz2-zdA
 
Here's an observation I have made personally, I'm not sure if anyone else has noticed this.

9ab170504ef57d8e2b2e7428bf5aae15.png


The human body if you compare it to a chimp aside from being bipedal is streamlined, it's a much more appropriate body shape for moving through water. Any animal that adapts itself to water will possess streamlining.

image.jpg


The first bipedal primates didn't possess the same streamlining humans have they were much more like chimps in body proportion, as in not appropriate for water. They didn't really go into water at all so there was no need for them to be. So I definitely think there's some truth it, humans are a water loving species of ape we started getting immersed into it at some stage.

rGvSMY0tJqMBnxLyyPVDmVxh8RuU4eqRvI3BIQNfQPl9H38nRp4Ws22JAHQFrPsYolbX26Qkl0F3PoKOFF8a3mAO0l1ZAYy9XEzBz2-zdA
At the same time humans have many vestigial bones and organs from earlier in evolution and as you know earlier in evolution many organisms were amphibian or fish like in nature.
 
At the same time humans have many vestigial bones and organs from earlier in evolution and as you know earlier in evolution many organisms were amphibian or fish like in nature.
We have new things other primates entirely lack though. For instance.

1611571143478


That's clearly a water related adaptation. A water related adaptation would make sense if we started spending a lot of time in the water. We can't see very well in water at all but wee weren't necessarily deep divers we just some foraging around in the shallows. A little bit more like this.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBkHnrPu3a0&t=1s
 
We have new things other primates entirely lack though. For instance.

View attachment 400501

That's clearly a water related adaptation. A water related adaptation would make sense if we started spending a lot of time in the water. We can't see very well in water at all but wee weren't necessarily deep divers we just some foraging around in the shallows. A little bit more like this.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBkHnrPu3a0&t=1s

It seems like more of a coincidence tbh. Evolution of apes taking a path within a few thousands to few millions of years suited to adaptations for wading through shallow pools or seasonal watering holes in the savanna? Not likely imo. No one knows for sure of course what theory is the truth tbh but evidence of the aquatic ape theory has only become less accepted with time and alternative explanations have been come up with to explain that supposed evidence.
 
It seems like more of a coincidence tbh. Evolution of apes taking a path within a few thousands to few millions of years suited to adaptations for wading through shallow pools or seasonal watering holes in the savanna? Not likely imo. No one knows for sure of course what theory is the truth tbh but evidence of the aquatic ape theory has only become less accepted with time and alternative explanations have been come up with to explain that supposed evidence.

If you look at the main locations concerning human origins they're generally located next to large bodies of water. There was an open savanna/grassland stage where our ancestors ended up looking a bit like my avi then there was a semi-aquatic stage after that which is when the first 'homo' or actual human evolved. That would make some sense.

map-human.jpg
 
there's no food for your face
 
is lidl meat good for cooonsume raw ?
 
is lidl meat good for cooonsume raw ?
Depends on what country you live in. Some countries vaccinate their animals more like France, Spain and Italy. So i wouldn't eat their meat raw from a supermarket. I accidentaly bought imported meat from Ireland once and ate it raw. Turns out Ireland don't use alot of antibiotics just like Sweden so it was safe.
 
Raw pork tastes good indeed. But it's risky to eat it.
 
If you look at the main locations concerning human origins they're generally located next to large bodies of water. There was an open savanna/grassland stage where our ancestors ended up looking a bit like my avi then there was a semi-aquatic stage after that which is when the first 'homo' or actual human evolved. That would make some sense.

map-human.jpg
True the rainforests in east Africa dried up with environmental changes and turned to open savanna/grassland. But at the same time as this happened the rains probably had become more seasonal and couldn't support the old rainforest growth. So you'd expect less (not more) large bodies of water where humans could wade in for most of the year. Then it would be even more unlikely that hairlessness is an adaption to humans having to become semi-aquatic to gather food and scarce resources tbh
 
large bodies of water where humans could wade in for most of the year.

That's a point there, walking on two legs opened the potential for wading around in water. It would make sense if a group of hominid living near to a body of water started to do that if there was food to be foraged. You can see the chimps in that video foraging for food in the water so that's definitely a thing.

Then it would be even more unlikely that hairlessness is an adaption to humans having to become semi-aquatic to gather food and scarce resources tbh

Becoming hairless is the first thing any animal that lives in water does it's like taking off all your clothes before getting into the bath.

download-e1578442277105.jpeg


Animal as a rule don't appreciate getting their fur wet, it's like us getting our clothes wet.

3771ee5b1751c33ef3d5fa2908d1aa7a.jpg
 
That's a point there, walking on two legs opened the potential for wading around in water. It would make sense if a group of hominid living near to a body of water started to do that if there was food to be foraged. You can see the chimps in that video foraging for food in the water so that's definitely a thing.
Maybe even though the annual water supply went down the loss of the rainforest meant less potential foraging from vegetation and so humans were forced to wade into watering holes or visit the coast to gather fish or other animals living in these bodies of water. Not that easy to tell imo and even then that probably wouldn't be a daily occurrence because of how expensive energy wise and time consuming it is to make make the daily trek to watering holes or faraway coasts just to gather some extra food.
Becoming hairless is the first thing any animal that lives in water does it's like taking off all your clothes before getting into the bath.

download-e1578442277105.jpeg


Animal as a rule don't appreciate getting their fur wet, it's like us getting our clothes wet.

3771ee5b1751c33ef3d5fa2908d1aa7a.jpg
Pretty strange you bring up the example of cats ngl. There are a lot of animals in the cat family that live in places with a lot of rain and flooding. Look at wildcats like ocelots in central America for instance where rains can be pretty heavy when they do come and there's no place to hide without getting thoroughly soaked.
 

Similar threads

D. B. Gooner
Replies
25
Views
1K
D. B. Gooner
D. B. Gooner
sbccel
Replies
1
Views
432
Paladin
Paladin
Bane6
Replies
3
Views
314
Xul
Xul
svgmn1
Replies
20
Views
689
blackpillednigga
blackpillednigga

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top