I am not a bloody wannabe jihadi terrorist. Stupid article is biased and lacking empathy, good going modern day liberal culture.
All the incel coverage is the same superficial glance. She, like all the others, is side stepping the core issue of lookism, the inequality of the sexual market, juggernaut law, etc. The Tinder experiments are the best way to illustrate this. She needs to see the pig woman experiment, and the pedo nazi Chad experiment.
Dear josselyn (or whatever your name is) would you date me and lost my virginity with you?
G
We are the result of feminism. Now it's the worst time to be an average male. Thanks to social media, women feel entitled to only the most genetically elite men. Put THAT in your story.
I doubt she'll care to look at experiments such as the ones you mentioned
She never will, unfortunately
A plain-looking woman with a rack, I guess the bottom of the rung "reporters" get us while those with a little credibility get #Me Too stories or something. "Appearance anxiety", is that a feminist rewording of BDD? I think there are guys here who were passed over for jobs, promotions, etc. based on their appearance. There are some like myself who face active shunning in public because of how we look. She cites how there's never been a female mass murderer due to rejection. That would lead you to think that she either sees men or at least sub-Chad males to be inherently destructive or that females have support systems that even Chad s never get.
I love the comments, these fucking guys saying stuff "bruh, just go to the Bunny Ranch instead of getting surgeries!" That guy in particular works for an engineering consulting firm founded by...TWO WOMEN! We all know how well that goes, bridges constructed under the leadership of women. The first few guys I saw aside from him just said "Great article, Jess!" hoping to get noticed or spreading the BS narrative that we're worse than Hitler. In a way, I'm glad most of my family has passed away, they don't get to see how we live in a world where women make false claims. Most guys never question it and then attack the accused just for a pat on the head.
I love the comments, these fucking guys saying stuff "bruh, just go to the Bunny Ranch instead of getting surgeries!" That guy in particular works for an engineering consulting firm founded by...TWO WOMEN! We all know how well that goes, bridges constructed under the leadership of women. The first few guys I saw aside from him just said "Great article, Jess!" hoping to get noticed or spreading the BS narrative that we're worse than Hitler. In a way, I'm glad most of my family has passed away, they don't get to see how we live in a world where women make false claims. Most guys never question it and then attack the accused just for a pat on the head.
REPOST:
Dear J,
1. Do you think posting flattering pictures of your body in the majority of your posts (especially your busom/chest area) perpetuates sexism experienced by feeeahmayles?
YOUR MAIN PROFILE PICTURE is an "ass shot". Do you think this is a professional way to conduct yourself that suggests journalistic integrity & vetted reporting? How would you perceive a male colleague posting shirtless-pics or close-ups of his crotch area in public social-media posts? Do you think this would advance or detract from his career propects?
2. Have you ever felt that most of your achievements are predicated on your looks or conventional-attractiveness to others?
I'm not saying you don't do fine work....you obviously don't need to write like Garcia Marquez or even Malcolm Gladwell to do a workman-like standard at your job. The scope of my question can be getting hired over lesser conventionally-attractive BUT equally qualified women to getting your articles fawned over by your male colleagues and friends. BTW: Most of the male attention you receive is predicated on your youth/fertility. IT IS absolutely true that women become invisible to society past a certain age or if not invisible, defininitely not catered to. Think of how a female aunt or female mentor in your office is treated compared to you.
In truth, you probably won't care because in a decades time you will likely not be as ambitious in your "career" and won't be working and will be living in a gentrified suburb of a major city. After all, those yoga classes won't attend themselves and in truth, a woman's increase in education-level actually decreases the workload she takes on. Typically, because she is married to someone of equal or greater earning (hypergamy) thus it makes no sense for her to continue the stress of working when *** "nothing is more important than being a mom." OR "once you have a child...its not about YOU anymore!" and other such largely-accepted tropes that notice women say...but men cannot say without being ridiculed.
I'm not asking you these questions out of any anger but genuine curiosity. I recently read somewhere that said the PRIME DIRECTIVE of society is to make sure that "NO white woman EVER suffers any discomfort!" It was written satirically, but did make me reflect on that the only countries with feminism/policies are countries with majority white women. Why do you think that is so?
Also don't let this place get to you. In a decades time you will be spending most of your take viewing Pinterest for knick-knacks to clutter your large residence (thanks to your successful husband) or taking pictures of food you are eating to post on Instagram.
Thanks for considering answering my questions.
Regards, K
*** I think that once a child reaches 4 years of age there is a 95% chance they will reach adulthood, statistically speaking. Unless you are actively plan on raising a Tom Brady or Bill Gates superachiever, there really isn't that much need to be super-fixated on your children. After all, despite your involvement in their upbringing, they may choose to be real estate agents or doctors or housewives, which is largely out of your control.
TBH I don't think its the progressives that keeps her life in a positive-feedback loop. It is her LOOKS. If she was unattractive, she would accentuate it by looking butch.
I mean, lets be real, no guy is going to argue with her as long as there is a small likelihood he might get to date her. And these are guys who are around her age...one can only imagine how well she is treated by her 45yo+ bosses for whom she is probably like a breath of air from being with their dumpy-assed crow's-footed wives.
However, eventually the compliments and wide-eyed attention she gets from her followers will wane as her attractiveness decreases while her weight increases. I am convinced some aspect of post-partum depression in feaahmayles, aside from hormonal changes, is linked to them consciously/subconsciously knowing that their "free drinks & life on tutorial mode" just got derailed.
Dear J,
1. Do you think posting flattering pictures of your body in the majority of your posts (especially your busom/chest area) perpetuates sexism experienced by feeeahmayles?
YOUR MAIN PROFILE PICTURE is an "ass shot". Do you think this is a professional way to conduct yourself that suggests journalistic integrity & vetted reporting? How would you perceive a male colleague posting shirtless-pics or close-ups of his crotch area in public social-media posts? Do you think this would advance or detract from his career propects?
2. Have you ever felt that most of your achievements are predicated on your looks or conventional-attractiveness to others?
I'm not saying you don't do fine work....you obviously don't need to write like Garcia Marquez or even Malcolm Gladwell to do a workman-like standard at your job. The scope of my question can be getting hired over lesser conventionally-attractive BUT equally qualified women to getting your articles fawned over by your male colleagues and friends. BTW: Most of the male attention you receive is predicated on your youth/fertility. IT IS absolutely true that women become invisible to society past a certain age or if not invisible, defininitely not catered to. Think of how a female aunt or female mentor in your office is treated compared to you.
In truth, you probably won't care because in a decades time you will likely not be as ambitious in your "career" and won't be working and will be living in a gentrified suburb of a major city. After all, those yoga classes won't attend themselves and in truth, a woman's increase in education-level actually decreases the workload she takes on. Typically, because she is married to someone of equal or greater earning (hypergamy) thus it makes no sense for her to continue the stress of working when *** "nothing is more important than being a mom." OR "once you have a child...its not about YOU anymore!" and other such largely-accepted tropes that notice women say...but men cannot say without being ridiculed.
I'm not asking you these questions out of any anger but genuine curiosity. I recently read somewhere that said the PRIME DIRECTIVE of society is to make sure that "NO white woman EVER suffers any discomfort!" It was written satirically, but did make me reflect on that the only countries with feminism/policies are countries with majority white women. Why do you think that is so?
Also don't let this place get to you. In a decades time you will be spending most of your take viewing Pinterest for knick-knacks to clutter your large residence (thanks to your successful husband) or taking pictures of food you are eating to post on Instagram.
Thanks for considering answering my questions.
Regards, K
*** I think that once a child reaches 4 years of age there is a 95% chance they will reach adulthood, statistically speaking. Unless you are actively plan on raising a Tom Brady or Bill Gates superachiever, there really isn't that much need to be super-fixated on your children. After all, despite your involvement in their upbringing, they may choose to be real estate agents or doctors or housewives, which is largely out of your control.
TBH I don't think its the progressives that keeps her life in a positive-feedback loop. It is her LOOKS. If she was unattractive, she would accentuate it by looking butch.
I mean, lets be real, no guy is going to argue with her as long as there is a small likelihood he might get to date her. And these are guys who are around her age...one can only imagine how well she is treated by her 45yo+ bosses for whom she is probably like a breath of air from being with their dumpy-assed crow's-footed wives.
However, eventually the compliments and wide-eyed attention she gets from her followers will wane as her attractiveness decreases while her weight increases. I am convinced some aspect of post-partum depression in feaahmayles, aside from hormonal changes, is linked to them consciously/subconsciously knowing that their "free drinks & life on tutorial mode" just got derailed.
Yeah I have thoughts for her but because I'm not a LARPer or a mental halfwit, my real world observations will go ignored.
So reporters, here are my questions for you:
What do you have to say about the obvious, scientically backed and ultimately damaging FACT that there's growing inequality in the dating market?
What do you have to say about the fact that despite more dating options for women over the course of the past 50 years, women are more miserable than they've ever been, and less likely to have a happy home life or a family life?
How do you reconcile the, "It's just your personality" meme for dating when there's literally no scientific basis for this opinion? As compared to the mountains of research that indicate looks, race, social status, educational attainment and income all affect dating options?
What would you do to combat the complete lack of care for the exponentially growing number of young men with undiagnosed mental illness, and how critical are you of the fact that most reported violence against women - including people like Alek Minassian and Elliot Roger - comes from this underserved minority of men?
How are you - as members of the media and journalism industry - able to reconcile the fact that on one hand you decry "incels" for being violent against women, and on the other hand repeatedly give positive attention to celebrities with histories of violence against women - like Chris Brown, Floyd Mayweather and others? Do you not hold some blame for propagating violence against women when you hold these celebrities up as idols?
And finally, in a broader sense; what is it you think you're doing when you repeat the idea that inceldom is just about neo-nazi woman hating when in all seriousness, most of the members of incel groups are ethnic minorities and people with clear and actual needs that are not being addressed? People who have been failed by society and are being left behind, which you then further demonise and victimize?
In a best case scenario, you're fuelling these delusion world views. In a worst case scenario, you are bullying and otherwise making very real problems worse.
I can almost guarantee none of these questions will be answered, and I have hundreds more.
So reporters, here are my questions for you:
What do you have to say about the obvious, scientically backed and ultimately damaging FACT that there's growing inequality in the dating market?
What do you have to say about the fact that despite more dating options for women over the course of the past 50 years, women are more miserable than they've ever been, and less likely to have a happy home life or a family life?
How do you reconcile the, "It's just your personality" meme for dating when there's literally no scientific basis for this opinion? As compared to the mountains of research that indicate looks, race, social status, educational attainment and income all affect dating options?
What would you do to combat the complete lack of care for the exponentially growing number of young men with undiagnosed mental illness, and how critical are you of the fact that most reported violence against women - including people like Alek Minassian and Elliot Roger - comes from this underserved minority of men?
How are you - as members of the media and journalism industry - able to reconcile the fact that on one hand you decry "incels" for being violent against women, and on the other hand repeatedly give positive attention to celebrities with histories of violence against women - like Chris Brown, Floyd Mayweather and others? Do you not hold some blame for propagating violence against women when you hold these celebrities up as idols?
And finally, in a broader sense; what is it you think you're doing when you repeat the idea that inceldom is just about neo-nazi woman hating when in all seriousness, most of the members of incel groups are ethnic minorities and people with clear and actual needs that are not being addressed? People who have been failed by society and are being left behind, which you then further demonise and victimize?
In a best case scenario, you're fuelling these delusion world views. In a worst case scenario, you are bullying and otherwise making very real problems worse.
I can almost guarantee none of these questions will be answered, and I have hundreds more.
Great posts, both of you. Unfortunately, it's common sense that arguments like this that challenge a woman's way of life will simply be ignored by the woman in question.
ur a julycel therefor ur retarded Kek
also white liberal women are the most racist.
also white liberal women are the most racist.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
