I feel the same way. I hate being a midwit. I hate having limitations on my capacity for higher reasoning and intelligence solely based on the fact that I’m a tropical nigger and we didn’t have as many selection pressures for intellect as the whites and Asians that lived in the north did. I would trade half or even three quarters of my entire lifespan with a higher power if I could be born with a superior IQ and become a mathematician, philosopher, and electrical engineer all at once. But I would also be more verbally articulate, have higher awareness of socio-manipulation tactics used by normie scum, and have a better quality of life in general from. II would leave behind a legacy and die like Mozart or Alexander the Great.
A study conducted by University College London which studied the relationship between levels of happiness and IQ scores, and it found that those in the range of 70-99 had the poorest levels of happiness while those in the 120-129 range had the happiest. I chalk this up to those with higher intelligence making informed choices that improve the quality of their lives, whereas it’s the opposite with the former group. This bleeds into income, socioeconomic status, health and affects your risk of developing psychiatric disorders.
It’s absolutely devastating and unfathomably cruel that one’s intelligence is almost entirely genetic because some people are born into life set up for failure while others will flourish because they lucked out on the roll of the genetic dice. And to make matters most, you can’t take away other people’s reproductive rights even if it’s reasonably justified like them having a high likelihood of giving birth to stupid offspring because it “infringes upon their autonomy” and would be cockblocked by human rights activists. The same way these human rights activists would cockblock germline genome editing on ethnics to make them better looking and smarter because ridding society of genetic differences that count as disease or defect is not an undeniable good to them, because we’re judging sone to be biologically inferior and clipping them away from us and the insidious, idea that some genes are inherently bad and contaminate the human gene pool, therefore people who carry them should not propagate and pass those genes on to their progeny enrages social activists because they want ethnics to continue suffering as slaves and for the scales of global power to be tipped towards one side. It increases social inequality
Purging undesirable human variations is wrong to them as it borders on eugenics, and our society needs diversity. Fucking scum. Gene editing technologies are a way to instrumentalist moralistic reductionist assumptions to them and when we categorize those as diseased, it’s seen as an act of social inequality of them.
. It’s because of them that fourty countries have either now banned or discouraged these genome editing practices and ethnics will continue suffering for centuries.
It’s all downhill after the age of twenty when you start losing plasticity, which is why many argue that it’s pointless to learn a new language or area of study after the age of twenty five, because you have missed the critical stages for learning and memory consolidation. Your chances of understanding C++ at the age of twenty five is slim to none for instance.