Thoughts

[I_like_pizza]

Why is it "morally wrong" to kill someone if it create no suffering, like if i kill someone and no one ever notice his death no one will suffer from it, even him will just stop existing while in the other hand i get pleasure for doing it. Doesnt it mean that i created happiness without bad consequences, and isnt that the same with abortion but then why would people say thats its moraly wrong and then get an abortion.

 

[readingcel]

This is because utilitarianism doesn't seem to be the common sensical understanding of the normative measure behind moral actions.

 

[Sex-Starved Beast]

Why is it "morally wrong" to kill someone if it create no suffering, like if i kill someone and no one ever notice his death no one will suffer from it, even him will just stop existing while in the other hand i get pleasure for doing it. Doesnt it mean that i created happiness without bad consequences, and isnt that the same with abortion but then why would people say thats its moraly wrong and then get an abortion.

If no one will ever notice his death you won't get punished for it.

 

[endoftheskies]

Why is it "morally wrong" to kill someone if it create no suffering, like if i kill someone and no one ever notice his death no one will suffer from it, even him will just stop existing while in the other hand i get pleasure for doing it. Doesnt it mean that i created happiness without bad consequences, and isnt that the same with abortion but then why would people say thats its moraly wrong and then get an abortion.

consequentialism + utilitarianism moral ideology. i.e an action should be judged on its outcome and not its intention lmao.

 

[readingcel]

If no one will ever notice his death you won't get punished for it.

I swear to god the average iq here has been descending exponentially for the past few months. How does judicial punishment in and of itself, in ANY shape or form, relate to the thread?

 

[endoftheskies]

I swear to god the average iq here has been descending exponentially for the past few months. How does judicial punishment in and of itself, in ANY shape or form, relate to the thread?

decreasing* descending suggest an optimal solution.

 

[readingcel]

decreasing* descending suggest an optimal solution.

Methinks both are valid here, insofar as there is a variety of orders of "intellects" here on the site to ground the term "descending".

 

[Pikacel]

Lowkey true Bhai

 

[Animecel2D]

I like pizza

 

[endoftheskies]

I would kill people for a lokum.

 

[I_like_pizza]

consequentialism + utilitarianism moral ideology. i.e an action should be judged on its outcome and not its intention lmao.

i dont understand arent the intention and the outcome the same thing here ; intention : kill somebody to increase happiness, outcome: hapiness increased

 

[baldfartsniffer]

Why is it "morally wrong" to kill someone if it create no suffering, like if i kill someone and no one ever notice his death no one will suffer from it, even him will just stop existing while in the other hand i get pleasure for doing it. Doesnt it mean that i created happiness without bad consequences, and isnt that the same with abortion but then why would people say thats its moraly wrong and then get an abortion.

It’s morally wrong because of the unnecessary suffering he will have went through during his death. I don’t believe morals matter that much though, although they clearly work well in society as a whole, they are mostly a religious concept. Death is natural. Death isn’t inherently bad.

 

[baldfartsniffer]

I like pizza

Me too