Thought

[3rdspecimen]

How can you say atheism has scientifical proof? You are listening to a scientist like a christian listens to a priest. In the same way the Christian didn't see Jesus become reanimated, the atheist didn't see evolution. Atheists are like well science proves this but they haven't actually done any science, they just listened to someone else say that "science". Same way you cant say definitively the earth is round, have you seen it? You say science and i say do it yourself. How do you know scientists aren't just the devil trying to convert people to atheism? There is no such thing as original thought. Everything is do as tell.

 

[VeryNiceGuy]

No it doesn't, they are just attention seekers who pretend to be so smart for not believing in a god

 

[endoftheskies]

How can you say atheism has scientifical proof? You are listening to a scientist like a christian listens to a priest. In the same way the Christian didn't see Jesus become reanimated, the atheist didn't see evolution. Atheists are like well science proves this but they haven't actually done any science, they just listened to someone else say that "science". Same way you cant say definitively the earth is round, have you seen it? You say science and i say do it yourself. How do you know scientists aren't just the devil trying to convert people to atheism? There is no such thing as original thought. Everything is do as tell.

atheists are materialists. they just want people to live materialistically and consume as much as possible. they mask it with 'reason' and 'science'. yet it is they who are wrong. reminder that the majority of scientific innovation happened by religious men, and was created by religious men. and then there are foid scum who are atheists because religion is sexist.

 

[Excalibur]

Per the scientific method, atheism is the belief that makes the most sense. There's no firm evidence for the existence God, therefore he likely does not exist - that's their reasoning.

Of course, it's just a shot in the dark, and it's entirely possible to accept the scientific method and still choose to believe in God out of faith.

 

[Emba]

There's more scientific evidence of a creator(s?) Than for a rando evo.

For example: after a "global" shake & and bake most of the same stuff that was destroyed, comes back. (After everything was totally destroyed)

Coal seams, mammoth tusk islands, etc...


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KWqrMnDpEs


Unfortunately, the sheer scale of it is (probably) beyond our comprehension.

 

[forsenMaxLevel]

is it not just obvious that God is cope

 

[kay']

Keep your low iq religious garbage in the designated section