Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Those of you who claim most of us wouldn't be incel a couple of decades ago...

  • Thread starter thelonewanderer
  • Start date
T

thelonewanderer

Banned
-
Joined
Apr 26, 2019
Posts
241
What makes you think that? We are bottom of the barrel men no matter what time we are in
 
average men are incel as fuck

but tinder and smart phones aren't real

okay, so how does an average guy get laid through PUA?
 
I would've always ended up as an incel, regardless of the time period.
 
I think I would have had an opportunity way back in time; it would have to be before 1950s. Maybe after world war 1 or 2 when there were fewer men and there was a lot of propaganda to encourage healthy families, so a chick would have settled with me and maybe we could have been happy together.

I'm not saying she would necessarily be attracted to me, but let's just say marital rape laws only came into place in 1991 :feelshmm::feelsthink:
 
It's true I wouldn't be an incel, I would be a deadcel because of chronic illness.
 
Probably more than two decades ago, let´s say at least 30 or 40 years ago, but I´m saying this because back in the time female hypergamy was actively repressed - and not state funded like today´s time - and the requirements for a man were both much less demanding and much more attainable.
 
Because inceldom has doubled since 2008. Just 10 years ago, half this forum would not be incel
120220
 
Because inceldom has doubled since 2008. Just 10 years ago, half this forum would not be incel
View attachment 120220

Men tend to overstate and women tend to understate when it comes to sex, so you can safely assume the male number is higher and the female number is lower
 
Men tend to overstate and women tend to understate when it comes to sex, so you can safely assume the male number is higher and the female number is lower
Definitely. This chart means that 28% of men at a MINIMUM are incel, but it could be as high as 50% for all we know.
 
What makes you think that? We are bottom of the barrel men no matter what time we are in

Because I look the same as my father and he had no problems in getting SEVERAL girlfriends back in 70's and 80's. I'm not from USA though, but my country in last 10-15 years completely transformed into degenerate west, so everything changed much more than in USA/western Europe. We basically went from shitty poorland where everybody had a girlfriend/wife(even if he was ugly, if at least he was a little bit clever enough to have SOME wealth he was golden) to not so shitty not so poorland where half of young guys are incels.
I just wish our culture wasn't completely destroyed by the west but I can't blame west itself. Instead I blame people from my country. They sold their souls for few bucks
 
Probably more than two decades ago, let´s say at least 30 or 40 years ago, but I´m saying this because back in the time female hypergamy was actively repressed - and not state funded like today´s time - and the requirements for a man were both much less demanding and much more attainable.
 
Because the bottom of the barrel used to mean 0.5%, not 80%.
 

Similar threads

P
Replies
3
Views
449
sugarboy
S
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
28
Views
2K
kapri
kapri
LeFrenchCel
Replies
71
Views
2K
jo_yugislayer08
jo_yugislayer08
F
Replies
6
Views
884
tntd
tntd

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →