Curries have 22 different langs and that's just officially recognised. You picked an odd one. I wonder why. Literal foid behaviour.
Ok, going from Hindi to Bengali to Punjabi to Nepali isn't that difficult if one were to actually try, could take around 6 months, I used a specific example because it's the most obvious one. I admit the Dravidian languages are totally different though. Do I have to babysit you and go through every one of them so I don't sound like a 'foid' to you?
Curries have different foods (I swear you'd pick on it if you were to respond), ethnic wears, festivals, monuments, a very wide spectrum of skin color.
I don't deny that.
but curries do have a great diversity problem, bigger than any other countries.
It does, because curries want to cope with being unique by having all these divisions when the outside world views them as the same vermin, I don't deny that. The Chinese still managed to unite at one point despite having glaring differences, you might want to split hairs and say differences among curries are far greater than Chinese, which is true, but that's only looking at the present, it's being short sighted. Historically in Chinese society, for thousands of years, any attempt of a group trying to break off from them end up getting "Hanified", today they send Han Chinese to Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia to homogenise the population as much as possible so no separatist movement can arise, in a few decades these populations would also be considered Han Chinese.
The Chinese ruling class for centuries actively shuts down any attempts of claims that different dialects are another language, the government doesn't promote castes or encourages religion to flourish there because these are all pivot points for where division can occur. They maintained this practice of 'Sinicisation' for so long which is why you didn't see different languages (at least on paper) pop up in China throughout the course of time, but you did in India, because Indians didn't fear division the same way the Chinese historically did. It's understandable as wanting to give up the status of a caste or religion or dialect would mean throwing out one's pride.
Of course the solution will be a lot harder in Curryland since the division is already done. Centuries of policies promoting division were there, I'm not downplaying the differences at all. China could have led to the same path of division had their policies been different. That's my main point. Do you agree or are you going to cope with this by being short sighted by only looking at their present history of everyone being Han Chinese and say it's easy for them to maintain homogeneity?
IDK, why you are so riled by it.
Pretty much because most curries act and think the same, have the same poor habits, despite being from various castes and speaking different languages. So they aren't as different as you think they are, and upon this realisation an attempt of unification could be there. Furthermore, the basis of unification could have been possible if hundreds of years of strict policies were in place like China.
I could see it as a 'proper' division if one curry group managed to do something reputable or acts totally different to a point where it's recognisable by other groups, but there hasn't been such, literally all curries are the same vermin to the outside world, all curries think and act the same even if they're from different religions, castes, skin colour.
Curries can call different dialects of Hindi a billion different languages all they want, or make up new castes as the centuries go by but that won't change the fact that they all genetically cluster similarly, that they are the same vermin to the rest of the world and their common behaviours are something which most of them have.
