Soy "this is one that a lot of "incel" guys could really stand to read"

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

DOGE is About Sex

Or am I just constantly thinking about sex? Many such cases.

www.cartoonshateher.com

All right, since this guy (on the right) is telling me I could stand to read this:


View: https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/1887277279858073932#m


I decided, why not, and hoo boy, did I have no idea what I was signing up for.

Right off the bat, this chick fully confirms the way this forum talks about women, and thinks she's owning us.

Earlier this week, I wrote Average Men Don’t Have the Cards,

So, right off the bat, full acknowledgment of the blackpill? Nice. So, average men don't have th cards, but average women do? So an agreement that inceldom is a male-only problem, and fem"cels" don't exist? Good.

about how many (albeit not all) single women would prefer to stay single than to date or marry someone they don’t find attractive,

Yup, we know that. Women are only attracted to top men, men are attracted to all women. Blackpill 101.

and that usually, their standards are high in the area of mental chemistry, not looks or income.

Bullshit and we've known that for years,

Study showing: (1) Women lie tremendously about the importance of looks, and (2) It is Looks > Personality > Money for both genders

This study looked at how important each gender rated: Physical Attractiveness, Personality, and Earning Power in a relationship. Then they studied to what degree these traits actually led to success in speed dating. Speed dating is the fairest model to allow personality or earning power to...

incels.is

Thoughts on the "It's Looks > Personality > Money for both genders, women just lie more about it" study on incels.wiki?

Title. I've seen some threads and comments recently on the order of importance of those things, if and when personality actually comes into play, so I thought of just asking about your thoughts on this...

incels.is

but let's see how long will she hold this claim.

Later in the article, I mentioned that most male opposition to women having the ability to work for their own income is driven not by genuine concern about children’s upbringings, the birth rate, or anything else vaguely altruistic, and is purely a sexual strategy. Ho-hum men will have the cards again if women have no means to provide for themselves. Most men cloak this strategy in language about family values, but occasionally one will go mask-off and gleefully look forward to a world where dull, doughy, lower to middle-income men are hot commodities for all women.

Literally one paragraph later, the "mental chemistry is where women have high standards" is gone.

Jfl at the language and the way she cloaks it. "a world where dull, doughy, lower to middle-income men are hot commodities for all women" how about a world where dull, lower-income men can be partners to dull and lower-income women? Why are women never "dull"? Why isn't them being lower income ever a problem. Why isn't women being average ever a problem?

Oh, wait. I almost used logic and tried explaining a woman's thought process while thinking like a man. Notice, at the beginning, it was "Average Men Don't Have The Cards." If you've been asking how about average women, well, here it is. According to themselves, women can never be average, or below-average. How could they be? After all, all of them are certain that they deserve the top Chads they pine after. According to women themselves, all women themselves, they are always "top" and "above-average", being average or below-average is a male-only thing that no woman can ever be, and so if a woman can't get the top 20% Chad, regardless of her own status or looks, it is better to stay single than to "settle" for a bottom 80% man, because all of them KNOW for certain that no matter what, they are better than 80% of men.

Once again, Blackpill 101, thanks for agreeing with us.

Romantically unsuccessful men aren’t competing with attractive men—they’re competing with women’s ability to choose to stay single (either in the interim or indefinitely) and support themselves. To put it simply, their enemy isn’t Chad, it’s Whiskers (and a salary that affords her the ability to care for Whiskers.)

Yes, just as I've written above, thanks for agreeing with us.

Even though the vast majority of employed women aren’t working for the federal government, DOGE depends on the exact fury outlined in my article (the same fury directed at the Australian TikTok women) to gain support. The idea is simple: if we take away the ability for women to work for their own income, they will once again be forced to settle for you to survive. How appealing!

Jfl at the tired "women never worked before" cope, we've seen that one destroyed so many times it's not even funny at this point.

Well, that was just about the only really interesting part about this, the rest is some US culture war-brainrotted mumbo-jumbo irrelevant to anyone not in the author's social circles (muh "AI is more likely to take men's jobs away than women's, take that inkwells") but there are some good parts which just further show you how the author and women in general, really, see the world:

Last year, a bunch of Australian women who worked at a woman-owned skincare company did a goofy (and yes, kind of annoying) TikTok, which irritated right-wing men so much that it’s now being blamed for Trump’s election and the Trumpcession. Does this still seem weird, unrelated and illogical? Allow me to take you down the rabbit hole.

let’s go back to the Australian TikTok. Back when it first went viral, I saw my fellow liberals express genuine confusion as to why it signified something so visceral for right-wing men. Perhaps all my time on right-wing Twitter has given me too much of an understanding of this, but basically, a lot of men (specifically, single and frustrated ones on the right who have a negative view of women) have a perplexingly reverse-SJW attitude toward women in the workplace. They believe women are part of an oppressor class, who has for some reason been granted unfair degrees of privilege in the form of being hired for fun, pretend jobs. In their mind, almost every working woman has an “email job,” specifically one that wasn’t available to men, and provides no value. Something like “Vice President of Pronouns.”

First off, that's the very first time I see that TikTok, and I wouldn't be surprised if the same is true for most of the guys here.

Second off, jfl at the mental/word games the author is doing here. If men had a "perplexingly reverse-SJW attitude toward women in the workplace" and saw as "part of an oppressor class, who has for some reason been granted unfair degrees of privilege in the form of being hired for fun, pretend jobs" then surely there would be much better examples of that then people getting mad at a TikTok of women who, by absolutely any measure, are in fact very highly privileged showing it off?

Just like at the beginning where the author spoke of "average" and "lower-income" men, but only spoke of "all women", the author seems to be erasing the existence of women other than high-earners. That makes sense, of course. You can't pretend that women are a group above all below-average and average men if you admit that any other than above-average women exist. So, the author claims that there is a horde of men who hate on absolutely all working women and claim that all women only work cushy, meaningless jobs, but all of the examples she gives of that are just people reacting to dumb TikToks from very high-earning and very privileged women goofing off in a way that nobody less privileged and lower-earning would be allowed to.

They believe if AI replaced these unnecessary jobs, women would be rightfully forced to settle for schlubs (no self-improvement required on behalf of said schlubs) to avoid being destitute.

Once again, no acknowledgement of women also being in those positions, and those women rejecting men on their level. Once again, in her mind, being below-average is something that's male-only.

But those jobs aren’t exclusive to women. When I asked my Twitter followers to describe their most bullshit jobs, plenty of the slackers were men working in tech, and even some blue collar workers.

Yes, and? Those guys are just as annoying, but they seem to be disproportionately less likely to flaunt their privilege on the internet filled with less fortunate people. Also, jfl at her suddenly admitting that certain income position (aka being rich) suddenly has to be noted to be something both genders are in, when nowhere in that entire screed are low income or below-average women acknowledged in any way.

As I’ve written before, a great deal of what we perceive as general misogyny online is actually class resentment.

More or less. Emphasis on the less. Though given what I've written above I guess I put myself in a tough spot if I wanted to debate this.

The women on the receiving end of the ire are generally white upper-class working women over thirty for the same SJW-ish reason I mentioned before:

Are they generally those women? I can imagine that a lot of feminists from the Global South would contest that, though if you are too solipsistic to think of or understand anything outside of your social circles, this would be the case for you.

disgruntled bottom-half men see these women

Once again, do bottom-half women even exist in this person's worldview? Not a single word in this bullshit seems to even imply that the author seems them as a possibility.

(but not their male counterparts, who work equally cushy jobs) as a class of privileged oppressors.

Huh? Richfags are richfags, no matter what. Again, just because you are painfully solipsistic doesn't mean that the world works the way your social circles do. When, in the entirety of history really, have male and female richfags been hated differently by the people they are exploiting? As a working-class non-American, I don't really see much of a difference between any of the people talked about in that article.

This might make zero sense to you, a normal person, but this completely unhinged reply to me kind of sums it up

What exactly about it makes zero sense to a normal person? Normal, working people have disliked richfags regardless of gender for the entirety of history.

As an upper middle class woman who has worked a variety of bogus, cushy tech jobs

Yes, I could tell, your inability to understand any other social environment was a dead giveaway, as is your very skewed idea of a "normal person".

Yes, overpaid female executives exist, but your perception of them as the emblem of the ruling class is driven by TikTok rage bait, not by reality.

And if they weren't overrepresented among the people who make TikTok rage baits, then their male counterparts very much would be the ones receiving hundreds of times more hate. We know that social class makes almost zero difference for how warmly people feel about men, but does scale for women, with basically all men being as disliked as the bottom 10% of women while women just get more and more liked as their social status rises.

Study - We have anti male issues not race issues

Intersectional implicit bias: Evidence for asymmetrically compounding bias and the predominance of target gender Abstract: Little is known about implicit evaluations of complex, multiply categorizable social targets. Across five studies (N = 5,204), we investigated implicit evaluations of...

incels.is

These men won’t have to become more interesting, work out, or do anything to improve themselves,

Jfl at all the shit this chick wrote only to default to "Duh, well, improooov yourself inkwell." Yeah, all the manlets, autists, disableds, ethnics, poorfags and others on forums like this are just holding themselves back from hitting the gym and becoming the tall, buff richfags with chiseled features all of us can just become at the drop of a hat.

Men ARE self-improving. Men ARE doing their best to be their best. At this point, over 30% of men who date online are using steroids and more of them have bulimia to control their weight than women. It still doesn't do shit.

36.4% of US male online daters are now resorting to anabolic steroids & bulimia to compete - Scientific Blackpill

outside of bringing in a middling salary and existing, or so they think.

Again. Again and again and again, it seems that for this person, it is only men who can even BE average. "Middling salary", by definition, is more than a lot of women themselves earn, but even the poorest and lowest skilled woman should be entitled to high-earning Chad, because women are above income or any other hierarchies, all women are Stacies and entitled only to the best.

Is this…good? Like, do guys actually want a woman to have reluctant sex with them so she can receive food and shelter? I always assumed no. I mean, most guys are wary of gold diggers for this reason, right?

I actually got into a civil mini-debate with some guys on Twitter about the idea of women faking attention for the purpose of obtaining resources, and I was surprised to see that some men don’t think this is a real thing. They believe a woman being with someone for the money they can provide is genuine attraction, the same way it’s genuine attraction to be with someone because you find them hot or funny. I feel like this obviously isn’t true—you couldn’t argue that a 23-year-old sugar baby has genuine attraction to the oldest and ugliest of her clients, right? Do they think a stripper who takes a client to a private room is experiencing genuine attraction? Or maybe these guys believe that any woman who has sex with any man is doing it out of true desire.

Kek.

Once again, thanks for the blackpill, your blabbering was getting too boring. Tradcucks blabbering about "muh women want providers" are on suicide watch right now.

Though it's very funny that she shits on betabuxxing, and yet, throughout the entirety of this article she was bringing up low or average-earners as examples of men women are right to not be attracted to. Money means nothing to attraction, but, of course, hypergamous programming is hypergamous programming, so of course the guy must also be loaded.

More disturbingly, perhaps they don’t understand that women can have desire at all.

Yeah, those tradcucks probably don't. We do though and we know exactly what it is women want, we just don't like being gaslit and lied to over it.

Perhaps this is, as the youth say, “cope.” But I think it also might just be a fundamental difference in the way men and women view sex and attraction. Some men view their resources as an extension of themselves, akin to a woman’s looks. I obviously disagree, in that your looks are, well, part of you, and money is, quite literally, something else that is outside your body

Eh, there's more nuance to that. Income and looks are correlated, good-looking people earn more and we know that, and social class and status are both strongly heritable and there's really not that much intergenerational mobility globally apart from a few very rich countries, but that's just me being pedantic.

Maybe they don’t care. Maybe a woman suffering through sex with them is fine, and they’d prefer that to not having sex (even though—let’s be real—they could pay a sex worker to do that today, and there’s a reason they’re not doing it. Revealed preference, many such cases.)

Lots of us do, just look at any escortcel debate on here.

But either way, DOGE isn’t going to make it happen. A recession isn’t going to make it happen, nor will AI replacing a bunch of jobs—they’re more likely to find themselves destitute than they are to experience a newfound identity as a 1950s Chad. And that’s another area where men don’t have the cards: if they can’t make their own money, they can’t trade in sex or companionship for someone else’s resources, unless they’re willing to make some pretty major compromises on, say, the resource-provider having a penis (and even then, I’ve seen gay beauty standards—not sure you’d all make the cut.)

"Hehe, go have sex with men inkwell."

Jfl. This chick just can't save herself from spewing blackpills. Yes, women are never going to be providers for men. Despite the flaunted "wage gap" being just a couple percentage points once corrected for positions, experience and so on, as we all know, there are almost no househusbands or stay-at-home fathers. Despite objectively minimal differences in earnings, whenever one spouse supports and provides for the other, it is a man providing for his wife or girlfriend. Women see even attractive men as replaceable, and would never agree to providing for anything below that, while men have been happy providing for and supporting just about all women for centuries, even though, as I've mentioned, women have perfectly been able to work and support themselves and their families for most, if not all of history.

Ultimately, the biggest problem with singles today isn’t that men aren’t tall enough,

Bullshit.

or that women have too many tattoos, or that everyone is too ugly. Most people simply aren’t meeting at all

Ah, the moral panic about people being lonely because of "muh phones" or other bullshit. Props to @GeckoBus for pointing out how bullshit of a notion that actually is in one of my threads recently.

Social media has no effect on real-life interactions, study - Scientific Inquirer

Since the invention of the telegram, the adoption of new technologies, such as television, smartphones and social media, has often led to fears of the decline of face-to-face interactions and the potential of decreased happiness. Now, researchers at the University of Missouri and the University...

scientificinquirer.com

[JFL] "Adolescence" already has three glowing reviews in The Guardian praising it to high heavens

:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek: A TV show is saying the same bullshit I do, therefore it's awesome:soy::foidSoy::soy::foidSoy:. https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2025/mar/13/adolescence-review-the-closest-thing-to-tv-perfection-in-decades "the closest thing to TV perfection in...

incels.is

Despite my article being maligned as misandrist neener-neenering to the bottom 50% of men,

Once again, bottom 50% of women don't exist.

it wasn’t meant that way. Most of the men who find themselves single and frustrated don’t actually hate women, and aren’t undeserving of a partner—they’re plagued by social anxiety and a lack of charisma, which are reinforced by not interacting with enough people. The fewer women to whom they talk, the more terrified they are of rejection. It’s a vicious cycle that only gets worse without action taken to reverse it.

But as I said before, unlike height or age, this is something that can be changed. I’m not in the business of giving dating advice, especially not to men, but I don’t think it’s controversial to say that getting off the phones, reducing porn and video game usage, and meeting more people in real life—men and women, platonic and romantic—is the only thing that will help these men. Trump and Musk won’t save them or give them rizz, even if they did manage to eliminate the female workforce. The only thing that will help is logging off, and meeting as many real-life people as possible, slowly eliminating anxiety through repeated exposures to social interaction. And DOGE isn’t going to help you do that.

"Just talk to people, just put the phone down, just don't watch porn"

I'm not even going to react to this endlessly-recycled bullshit at the end. "Just put yourself out there to be humiliated bro. Just work out, put the phone down and stop watching porn for some reason, so maybe, one day, you can attract your looksmatch who never had to do any of that, and is in fact an obese, phone-addicted gooner, and she will graciously settle for you." Always, always they just recycle this bullshit.

Spoiler

@based_meme @DarkStar @Regenerator @Mecoja @Stupid Clown @Sewer Sloth @Sergeant Kelly @Flagellum_Dei @To koniec @reveries @NIGGER BOJANGLES @veryrare @LeFrenchCel @PersonalityChad @OutcompetedByRoomba @GeckoBus @Lazyandtalentless @weaselbomber @ItsovERfucks @Grodd @anandkoala @Epedaphic @Wumbus @The Judge @Biowaste Removal @KING VON

 

[DarkStar]

Will read soon

 

[Paperman]

First, the problem with the people who hate us is that most don't really back it up; people hate us to raise their own position. Second, the opinions of the Jews in the video automatically don't count.

 

[ToBurble&Pine]

tl;dr?

 

[AntoCel]

Skimmes through it, so far good post, bookmarked, will read later

 

[Wrath]

my attention span could never

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

tl;dr?

Blackpills you could expect from someone here but said by a foid who thinks she's owning us mixed with her screeching that every woman is entitled to a Chad, though she doesn't say so outright but it's clear that she means it.

 

[GeckoBus]

Oh, wait. I almost used logic and tried explaining a woman's thought process while thinking like a man. Notice, at the beginning, it was "Average Men Don't Have The Cards." If you've been asking how about average women, well, here it is. According to themselves, women can never be average, or below-average. How could they be? After all, all of them are certain that they deserve the top Chads they pine after. According to women themselves, all women themselves, they are always "top" and "above-average", being average or below-average is a male-only thing that no woman can ever be, and so if a woman can't get the top 20% Chad, regardless of her own status or looks, it is better to stay single than to "settle" for a bottom 80% man, because all of them KNOW for certain that no matter what, they are better than 80% of men.

Giga IQ thread as always

This part stood out to me - women always boost each other to high Olympus. While telling us that "nobody is entitled" to anything, women spend 1000s of hours telling each other "you are worth it," "you deserve love as you are" and so forth. They also obsess over "self worth." Why are women entitled to unconditional love, never having to change themselves etc, but men are not?
"If you dont want me at my worst, you dont deserve me at my best "​

Spoiler: two example articles

View: https://tula-m.medium.com/the-truth-you-need-to-hear-you-are-worthy-of-love-4b0be6e61d5d


View: https://medium.com/@oreokubadejo/the-love-we-deserve-899f95b7e6f1

but they seem to be disproportionately less likely to flaunt their privilege on the internet filled with less fortunate people.

Because unlike women they would be punished for it. We let children be narcissistic and self-aggrandizing, same for cats and dogs and other neotenous creatures. Anything that looks cute can be narcissistic without repercussions.

 

[PersonalityChad]

Blackpills you could expect from someone here but said by a foid who thinks she's owning us

I will agree with everything incels have been repeating for years but frame it as feminist and empowering, that will show those evil nazi inkwells, teehee

Dumb bitch

 

[Stupid Clown]

@DarkStar already posted studies showing women do indeed have privilege in terms of gaining access to high paying jobs.

As to women being oppressors, they are. Almost every work place has the female dominated HR and female managers who were promoted solely for having a vagina. (Don't believe me? Look up the dei policies at the company you work for. I guarantee they'll boast about having more female managers.)

this…good? Like, do guys actually want a woman to have reluctant sex with them so she can receive food and shelter? I always assumed no. I mean, most guys are wary of gold diggers for this reason, right?

Our species wouldn't be around without this you fucking retarded bitch. If women only bred with men they found hot we wouldn't have modern society. Modern society is not natural. Women in nature do not have access to unlimited resources given to them by men without exchanging something aka sex. Modern society is unnatural and if it collapses we'll go back to the old ways

 

[Stupid Clown]

I'm sick of this "DON'T FORCE US TO BE WITH GUYS WE DON'T LIKE"
bullshit. As men we're trained since children to be selfless and put ourselves down to help others. Meanwhile women can just do whatever they want no matter how badly it affects society and you're a BAD PERSON ™ for even daring to question any of it

 

[Yabadadabadoo]

Too long..., BUT I DID READ

Firstly fuck this whore

Secondly I just discovered this DOGE thing and I support it so much if its the case. Too bad in a country like cuckspain shit like this would never happen and why every spanishcel need to leave the country asap

 

[Yabadadabadoo]

Also women are getting everything handled to them specially millenials and gen z. From education (Bologna process) to high paying positions (40% of executives will have to be foids in Spain by 2030 if im not wrong). Yet she claims they arent

All this does is create an artificial system far from being meritocratic.

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

I'm sick of this "DON'T FORCE US TO BE WITH GUYS WE DON'T LIKE"
bullshit. As men we're trained since children to be selfless and put ourselves down to help others. Meanwhile women can just do whatever they want no matter how badly it affects society and you're a BAD PERSON ™ for even daring to question any of it

 

[LWii]

Read it all.
The gaslighting is insane.
These foids must be hanged

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

I can't read it without having to take a walk around my room, this bluepilled shit they say is unreadable. Although, great post as always, pointing normcattle bluepill scholastics lies and general idiotism is always a good thing

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

I can't read it without having to take a walk around my room

I know that feeling as well brocel.

 

[Emba]

Fascinating thesis

 

[Lazyandtalentless]

Will read soon

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Read every word. This entire rant is just another attempt to gaslight men into thinking women are anything but picky, entitled, and unrealistic.

 

[Maikowski]

this dumb cunt pisses me off so much, women love to yap and yap about shit they don't have a clue about. Classic midwit assholes

 

[Maikowski]

One thing that pisses me off - There's no social repercussions to admitting that you only care about appearance. why even lie about it on the internet? I'll tell you why, because that would lower views on women if all men found out. So self serving gaslighting it is. Anything to protect the sisterhood from valid criticism.

women are just bad people.

 

[Adolf Kitler]

@Fat Link say: "its pinning time" and then he pinned all over the place

 

[Lv99_BixNood]

What does this have to do with DOGE? Oh right, absolutely nothing except for the fact the DOGE employees are ugly

 

[Enigmaz]

This roastie is really advocating for 'Just meet people bro'. There's a reason why sub-5 men are doing this less than anytime in history. Foids are hypergamous, narcissistic, and most of all lookist. Meeting and approaching a foid in real life is like walking on thin ice, as a sub-5.

In short, this foid is just spewing the same blue pill rhetoric we've all heard. She didn't 'outsmart' us or anything. Also she's complaining about nothing. Foid's jobs being replaced by AI. That's because foids work the easy and most simple jobs of which a stupid computer can do. I hope AI replaces porn, deskjobs, and IT. Fuck you, roastie.

 

[Lazyandtalentless]

Brutal

 

[Deep.Nest]

Beautiful high IQ thread

 

[Todd Thundercock]

One thing that pisses me off - There's no social repercussions to admitting that you only care about appearance. why even lie about it on the internet? I'll tell you why, because that would lower views on women if all men found out. So self serving gaslighting it is. Anything to protect the sisterhood from valid criticism.

women are just bad people.

There are social repercussions for women within their sisterhood. There's still stigma when they go too far being cruel to others who still behave socially appropriate and I've seen it. That's the entire reason they harp on about personaliteehee nonsense only after the male opens his mouth first. They need the door to be opened first.

 

[Biowaste Removal]

Just put yourself out there to be humiliated bro. Just work out, put the phone down and stop watching porn for some reason, so maybe, one day, you can attract your looksmatch who never had to do any of that, and is in fact an obese, phone-addicted gooner, and she will graciously settle for you.

Looksmatch is a massive stretch, even Chads can't get their looksmatch

 

[Biowaste Removal]

More like betabuxx for a 2/10 and she's the one "settling" for you

 

[KING VON]

Thank you for the ping. High quality analysis as always.

getting off the phones,

reducing porn and video game usage,

and meeting more people in real life

 

[Blacksmith]

Great topic start. The lack of perpective on the article author's part is nuts. Like you guys say, the playing field is extremely uneven for women vs men, and the author somehow manages to completely ignore that.
Good of TS to identify and point out the complete lack of "average" or "levels" in the female ranks; being a woman is a quality seal in itself. Obviously not so for men.

 

[reveries]

Very high IQ, thank you for breaking down and absolutely destroying this whore's gaslighting narrative.

You pointed out multiple times how there's never ever even a thought of women being "mid". Truly, they treat themselves even subconsciously as the royalty, and men as the peasants who are supposed to appease and work for them, they can't even fucking hide it even when it's needed to push a narrative.
They see themselves like this because this is what the outside world does as well, this is the feedback they've been receiving all their lives. They get everything for doing nothing. It takes a high IQ, highly moral person (which we know women aren't) to NOT be psychopathic in these conditions.

Another reminder that we don't owe shit to this society. It sees and treats us like disposable garbage.

P.S. of course she has to claim the problem is we don't get out of our way to become funny and go the gym. I did all these things and way more. Where's my gf? Have you ever seen a girl obsessing over an ugly short dude just because he's funny and gymcels?

 

[Mecoja]

I'm sick of this "DON'T FORCE US TO BE WITH GUYS WE DON'T LIKE"
bullshit. As men we're trained since children to be selfless and put ourselves down to help others. Meanwhile women can just do whatever they want no matter how badly it affects society and you're a BAD PERSON ™ for even daring to question any of it

People can be brainwashed into literally anything. If they succeeded into brainwashing men into liking "curvy" and they brainwash young people into cutting off their breast and their balls, they could brainwash girls into nonchads, but the truth is opposite, current hypergamy is artificially inflated.

 

[anotherwastedlife]

Bookmarking this high IQ post, this dumb whore cannot compete against our might

 

[SmhChan]

Later in the article, I mentioned that most male opposition to women having the ability to work for their own income is driven not by genuine concern about children’s upbringings, the birth rate, or anything else vaguely altruistic, and is purely a sexual strategy. Ho-hum men will have the cards again if women have no means to provide for themselves. Most men cloak this strategy in language about family values, but occasionally one will go mask-off and gleefully look forward to a world where dull, doughy, lower to middle-income men are hot commodities for all women.

HAHAHA! This retarded bitch. She literally explained it herself at the end but didn't understand. Of fucking course, it's sexual because without men having the bargaining power in the mating dance, there'd be no family to speak of. Of course, this evil piece of shit is just hellbent on blaming men. So, she gathered these soundbites like, 'falling birthrate' and 'child-rearing' and tried to make this narrative about men only caring about sex and implying foids are the altruistic gender. As if foids don't visit the abortion clinic like it's a toilet, use kids in family court to extract resource, or complain the most about kids. Also of course, she painted all guys as the ones complaining about falling birthrate when it's just online RWs or incels. Your average normie has fuck all idea about falling birthrate or any demographic stats. As for child-rearing, men did complain in the past when their wives would slack around or gossip with neighbors instead of looking after the kids. Those all have taken a backseat because of this hypergamy hellhole. Typical foid and her retardation, mixing up causality.

Literally one paragraph later, the "mental chemistry is where women have high standards" is gone.

Jfl at the language and the way she cloaks it. "a world where dull, doughy, lower to middle-income men are hot commodities for all women" how about a world where dull, lower-income men can be partners to dull and lower-income women? Why are women never "dull"? Why isn't them being lower income ever a problem. Why isn't women being average ever a problem?

Oh, wait. I almost used logic and tried explaining a woman's thought process while thinking like a man. Notice, at the beginning, it was "Average Men Don't Have The Cards." If you've been asking how about average women, well, here it is. According to themselves, women can never be average, or below-average. How could they be? After all, all of them are certain that they deserve the top Chads they pine after. According to women themselves, all women themselves, they are always "top" and "above-average", being average or below-average is a male-only thing that no woman can ever be, and so if a woman can't get the top 20% Chad, regardless of her own status or looks, it is better to stay single than to "settle" for a bottom 80% man, because all of them KNOW for certain that no matter what, they are better than 80% of men.

Once again, Blackpill 101, thanks for agreeing with us.

Also, carefully see, how the existence of middle-class low-income men is not a failure of the state or the country according to her. As if every man can just "work hard" and make money. Her implication is that if foids didn't work, all these low-income men wouldn't see a raise in their salary as well as see other perks of the bygone days like retirement funds, medical coverage etc. She doesn't see anything wrong in that regard if it were to be true. How altruistic of her that she would rather have a corrupt nation, so she could be 'proven right' about 'dull and lower income' men.

Jfl at the tired "women never worked before" cope, we've seen that one destroyed so many times it's not even funny at this point.

Tbh, she has a point there, but she doesn't understand it fully given her lack of historical context. The reason foids worked in the past, especially during the industrial age, but didn't ditch their husbands because the incentive to stick together was stronger. In fact, even their kids before turning 10 started working in factories and farms given how bad the financial condition was. But the world now is too safe, no reason to stick around like a family. Even the biggest shitholes in the current world are like a safe haven compared to the past.

The rest of the article seems like she is reduced to a beggar, with retarded claims like "men do cushy jobs too." She doesn't get the point at all. Even if foids did 'hard jobs', they would still see this opposition.

https://incels.is/threads/women-opposed-female-rights-not-men-study.634544/post-17292454

 

[SmhChan]

@

@DarkStar already posted studies showing women do indeed have privilege in terms of gaining access to high paying jobs.

As to women being oppressors, they are. Almost every work place has the female dominated HR and female managers who were promoted solely for having a vagina. (Don't believe me? Look up the dei policies at the company you work for. I guarantee they'll boast about having more female managers.)

But MRA cucks told me men just 'work too hard' and ask for a raise. That's why they don't get hired. So, wouldn't it be in company's best interest to hire fewer long-term male employees on high pay instead of more foid employees to do yoga and shit for a year or two until they get fired?

And Foids are such 'agreeable' angels, so much so that now these foids are replacing men in those senior positions in bulk. The fucking state of men.

 

[SmhChan]

People can be brainwashed into literally anything. If they succeeded into brainwashing men into liking "curvy" and they brainwash young people into cutting off their breast and their balls, they could brainwash girls into nonchads, but the truth is opposite, current hypergamy is artificially inflated.

Do you really think foids have been 'brainwashed' into being extremely hypergamous?

 

[Mecoja]

Do you really think foids have been 'brainwashed' into being extremely hypergamous?

To an extent i do. All this "yass qween dont settle for less you deserve the best" is brainwashing.

 

[Grodd]

I'm sick of this "DON'T FORCE US TO BE WITH GUYS WE DON'T LIKE"
bullshit. As men we're trained since children to be selfless and put ourselves down to help others. Meanwhile women can just do whatever they want no matter how badly it affects society and you're a BAD PERSON ™ for even daring to question any of it

 

[lifesucksandyoudie]

If foids don't treat other people well then they're not entitled to men treating them nicely. It speaks volumes about how inherently shallow, narcissistic and egotistical all womeme are when they demand men always prioritize female issues over their own male issues but they balk at men doing the opposite. They're retarded hypocrites that are too low IQ to realize their own double standards.

 

[based_meme]

This is what happens when women are given power. They spout these childish and retarded things that are given the gravitas of authority, because not doing so would be socially taboo (sexist, misogynist). This the women are wonderful effect, but applied to their words instead of their traits, attributes and characteristics.

We shouldn't have to respond to this drivel, but these mental children are taken seriously by enough that it almost demands a response.

 

[Fluoxymesterone]

I sometimes wish i could force the women you wrote this about to fully read this and make a response

 

[Gone Coping]

Hanania is a dysgenic freak, this is a guy who has needed to go for a long time.

 

[AssyrianCel]

One thing that pisses me off - There's no social repercussions to admitting that you only care about appearance. why even lie about it on the internet? I'll tell you why, because that would lower views on women if all men found out. So self serving gaslighting it is. Anything to protect the sisterhood from valid criticism.

women are just bad people.

Award winning post.

 

[Sans]

Not one letter

 

[8Ballcel]

Just another way foids get shielded from consequences and criticism because of incel accusations.
"Sure she killed your family, but she isnt jailed, what are you, a misogynist?"
Supposed to be hyperbolic but thats probably happened.

 

[8Ballcel]

They cant, the writers will resort to accusations and insults page one

 

[DarkStar]

I fucking love how her trying to "disprove" us or "reason" with us literally just proved us right in the first few sentences

Like you pointed out:
>Average men don't have the cards
>Statement implies average women do

Therefore, we've at least, at least, established this is a male-only issue.

Foids cannot fathom the concept of "average" because to them, they are exempt from being average due to soyciety. Simply, to a normie male who is bluepilled or even redpilled, a foid will always be a "Stacy" in a metaphorical sense, due to the fact that we've always been conditioned to see foids as the ultimate "prize" and thus, the guarantee of being seen as "better" or "above average" in the eyes of others.

They claim we have a deluded worldview, yet look at them. They literally cannot even seem to view themselves as on the same level as men, thus amounting most of us are subhuman to them.

@DarkStar already posted studies showing women do indeed have privilege in terms of gaining access to high paying jobs.

As to women being oppressors, they are. Almost every work place has the female dominated HR and female managers who were promoted solely for having a vagina. (Don't believe me? Look up the dei policies at the company you work for. I guarantee they'll boast about having more female managers.)

Yup, the fact that their "oppression" amounts to this is telling.

 

[DarkStar]

Blackpills you could expect from someone here but said by a foid who thinks she's owning us mixed with her screeching that every woman is entitled to a Chad, though she doesn't say so outright but it's clear that she means it.

you gotta read in between the lines

Giga IQ thread as always

This part stood out to me - women always boost each other to high Olympus. While telling us that "nobody is entitled" to anything, women spend 1000s of hours telling each other "you are worth it," "you deserve love as you are" and so forth. They also obsess over "self worth." Why are women entitled to unconditional love, never having to change themselves etc, but men are not?
"If you dont want me at my worst, you dont deserve me at my best "​

Yeah jfl, that's a prime example of their hypocrisy which is a blackpill
>: We deserve unconditional love!
>: Ummm sweetie you're too "average" you ain't got all the cards honey