Serious This forum made me sympathize a lot more with non-whites

[Deleted member 1252]

This forum made me realise that a lot of ethnics are low IQ and blame white people for everything.

 

[Breeding is immoral]

Ethnics have lower IQ

No they don't. Saying that proves that you're very low IQ. Some ethnics are smart some of them are dumb. I have met many smart black people and I have also met super low IQ blacks. Same with whites, indians, chinese, arabs, persians .... etc. Before you ask went to a top 100 uni and scored 99.9th percentile in my math SAT. inb4 hurr durr on average. Averages are very useless when discussing individual traits like height, weight, SAT scores, or other things like that.

 

[Brak123]

I will never understand the racepill because in my country black guys (sons of african immigrants) slay a lot.
I'm sure Moroccan, Serbian and Ukrainian ethnics are literallly all chads here

 

[GetFucked]

It's pretty obvious that most of the anger from whites who hate ethnics stems from their rage at white foids getting impregnated by them. Yet they seem to have no issue with noodlewhores getting rammed by whitecels so its just blatant tribalism hypocrisy. None of us chose what race we we're born into, so get over yourself, and realize we're all pretty much living miserable lives.

 

[incel-american]

IQ differences between the races are real but that actually has nothing to do with questions of superiority or inferiority. We live in a civilization that has put more emphasis on sheer intellectual prowess than any other culture ever did, but we also happen to live in the stupidest age in human history.

This contradiction is easily explained by the fact IQ doesn't actually equal intelligence. It is just a form of cerebral virtuosity which offers an advantage in a very external and purely relative plane. Don't forget that individuals of high IQ gave us stuff like this:



Meanwhile, so called sub-human low IQ blacks gave us this:



IQ essentially is the ability to deal with complex and difficult but highly relative and external concepts and abstractions which may or may not have any connection to any sensible reality and may not even contain a single trace of actual intelligence in them. Writing something like this requires an high IQ but there's no actual music or any trace of intelligence to be found in any of this:



Meanwhile something as seemingly simple as this requires a great deal of intelligence:



Not to mention something like this:



There's not even a single cognitive measure for g BTW, since it has been proven that there is a disparity in the higher ranges between a person's verbal, mathematical or spatial scores, and most IQ tests actually favor the verbal component, which is good for those races with a natural talent for discursive thought, such as Jews, or Northern Europeans.

The fact of the matter is that intelligence, true intelligence, is in essence the ability to perceive actual objective realities or metaphysical truths. It is the ability to pierce through the formal, in the Platonic sense, to see the reality that is outside the cave where as IQ only gives one the ability to deal with the shadows projected on the wall in an ever complex and sophisticated manner, but one that is no less illusory or relative.

Thus, in terms of this fundamental aspect of intelligence, all races are equal. But since each race is a different manifestation of the same human archetype, each will present certain differences not only in terms of their respective talents but also psychological differences and even different spiritual outlooks, and the basic division of the races seems to be that westerners or whites tend to be relatively cerebral and discursive, with a tendency for intellectual projection and outwardness which explains their creativity on one side, but also their dry rationalism and lack of intellectual subtlety on the other.

Asians on their part are more of a "visual" race and tend to think in terms of symbols instead of words. They are less creative than westerners but more contemplative and subtle.

Lastly, we have blacks, who have a "vital" form of genius. Their intellectual faculties are based on their greater understanding of forces and energies. Their ability in music or sports, credited to superior muscle mass, is actually owning to an higher "IQ" when it comes to thought when it occurs "in time" or in motion, so to speak. Unlike whites or Asians, black have less of a tendency to think in abstractions, either discursive or symbolic, which puts them in a disadvantage in an highly technocratic culture, but that is not actually a mark of inferiority for there is no intelligence in technology and modern civilization is a monstrosity to begin with. It is an aberration, a result of a mental deviation.

Either way, because of this deficiency blacks have an harder time assimilating among races such as Northern Europeans or Asians, but have an easier time with races of a more "intermediary" type, such as Southern Europeans, or Arabs and so forth. As a Salvini lookalike Italian untermenschen, i shared a certain degree of alienation when i lived in the states, since i found the mentality of people there to be too rigid, rationalistic and dry, not to mention very cold. I can only imagine how much worse it must be for blacks, who are even less rationalistic and dry than we Italians are, which is why i sympathize with their sense of alienation, even though i reject their Marxist inspired complaints.

super high IQ. I endorse this post entirely.

 

[DonkeyPunch]

It's pretty obvious that most of the anger from whites who hate ethnics stems from their rage at white foids getting impregnated by them. Yet they seem to have no issue with noodlewhores getting rammed by whitecels so its just blatant tribalism hypocrisy. None of us chose what race we we're born into, so get over yourself, and realize we're all pretty much living miserable lives.

Implying they aren't just as hypocritical.

 

[1984cel]

Another kike sponsored, high bait, and low IQ ethnic hug box thread from this guy

 

[SilentSoup]

You're not REALLY right wing unless you've taken the esoteric alt-right redpill. Realize that the only way to set things straight is when strong men restore monarchy and we learn to respect the Divine Right of their rule.

No nonwhites allowed! This traditional society will be like the Amish, except instead of beards and suspenders everyone dresses like Ancient Roman Centurions. Positions of governmental authority will be decided by a special scored competition where contestants have to play chess while they're weight lifting.

I'm telling you this because I'm a genius, a man with a clear vision of the future of humanity. Please ignore the fact that I'm a pathetic loser who can't even manage his own life.

 

[Angus13]

Most guys grow out of the alt right by the time they are forced to work and interact with society just like social justice Warriors.
not defending either as social justice Warriors and liberals view ethics as useful tools for their agendas.

Nobody gives a fuck about you and yeah most are destined to die alone.

The alt right was given to the white man, as a tool to ghettofy the white man in a similar method that the left, and socialism has done to the colored men. Think about this, the government has 2 gynocentric "sides" they play, they put the whites on the right, and the colored people on the left.

Angry white man blames jews for everything going on in the world (though personally I'm anti-zionist, not anti-jewish though), angry black man blames whites for everything going on in the world. Both have a strong form of ideological gynocentrism (liberal feminism vs. modern traditionalism, which is basically right wing feminism under another name), left promotes socialism, alt right promotes "national socialism" or "nationalism," which in itself is just a more insular form of socialism.

Both promote spoon-fed counter cultures that promote eugenics, and nihilism. The left started off as a counter culture, then it promoted Darwinism as evolution, today they are the mainstream, things flipped and now the alt ight is the counter culture. They promote the same concepts of eugenics and nihilism, either through some PUA/neo-masculinity type shit, or through the stormfront propaganda.

The idea of which behind these CCs is to erode the moral core of society to such a degree, that is becomes easier to dumb them down to such a level they become dependent on the state. And they will even advocate in extreme cases, for tyranny (ie dictatorship) as savior, as ironic as that is.

What I don't get is why an incel would even identify with race or political labels. Why simp so hard to beg for acceptance from a bunch of normies who've already rejected them on sight? Why should any incel (no matter their "race") be loyal to a race of people that disowned them?