Blackpill There's no chad in himself

[Flagellum_Dei]

Existence of chad is mediated in existence of nonchads; the proportion of these two are set by hypergamy. The greater disproportion is - the greater hypergamy. I don't know how to set this proportion, but it's obvious the minimal value of it is at least greater than 1:1. Therefore to be one chad, there's needed at least one nonchad.

Knowing that, one can see that hypergamy is unsolvable while femoids are allowed to act freely. For even if they manage to kill all nonchads, the chads will divide into two new classes, according to this law. Moreover, it proves that there's no chad in himself, so one that will last in this state indifferent to the world outside him, but rather one's chaddom is determined by circumstances.

 

[Grodd]

but rather one's chaddom is determined by circumstances.

It's determined by genetics

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

It's determined by genetics

You misunderstood what I wrote. Chad can't be a chad without nonchads. But yes, attractiveness is determinated by genetics.

 

[Grodd]

Chad can't be a chad without nonchads.

Well yeah because there would be nothing to compare to

 

[Only_Perspective]

Knowing that, one can see that hypergamy is unsolvable while femoids are allowed to act freely

yeah, even if somehow all 'ugly' men just die out, average will become the new ugly and so on and on.

 

[Emba]

You misunderstood what I wrote. Chad can't be a chad without nonchads. But yes, attractiveness is determinated by attractiveness.

 

[Deleted Member 8090]

So are you assuming women's attraction is not based off biological prerequisites but rather just comparative attractiveness to other males? I don't know about this. Think of it the reverse:
In a world of unattractive incels, females would still be biologically unattracted to them and probably choose not to have sex with vast majority.
So in a world full of chads, sure the best chads would get the most attention, but I feel all males would have it a lot easier

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

So are you assuming women's attraction is not based off biological prerequisites but rather just comparative attractiveness to other males? I don't know about this. Think of it the reverse:
In a world of unattractive incels, females would still be biologically unattracted to them and probably choose not to have sex with vast majority.
So in a world full of chads, sure the best chads would get the most attention, but I feel all males would have it a lot easier

Cope. When preindustrial hyprgamy existed, at least in femoids without impact on world outside them, the chad was one who was highest and with broadest jaw at the time. But after industrial revolution and massive improvement of life standards, preindustrial chad was no more, since there were men better looking than him. And again: people were divided in accordance to the law I described. If you wait until even more fisherian runaway traits will grow, Meeks and other today chads will be trucels exactly because of this mechanism.