FakeFakecel
PhD in Agony & Anguish
-
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2023
- Posts
- 5,695
All this would've been solved if the Glorious Imperium Romanum had conquered the world

No it doesn't. My parents grew up in the soviet union and things were a lot different than you westernoids think. All of youse romanticize that part of history way too muchCommunism allows to enforce egalitarianmaXxed policies such as home grown state mandatory gf
kys commie
With Nazi germany and flamethrowersAll this would've been solved if the Glorious Imperium Romanum had conquered the world![]()
![]()
![]()
You could shove that soy utopia up your ass commieSoyboy is the most negative IQ insult ever. Plus preaching for a totalitarian incel gigapower utopia isn't soyboy
High IQAll this would've been solved if the Glorious Imperium Romanum had conquered the world![]()
![]()
![]()
Then why did sexual revolution only happen in the capitalist west and not in the USSR? Capitalism caused sexual revolution, equal rights for foids and faggots.Marxism-Leninism is cucked. I don't know what the hell you're talking about. From Engels to Kollontai, through Lenin and his wife, they are the basis and foundation of modern "free love" and "sexual freedom" feminism.
The socialization of women worked most efficiently through enforced monogamy, forcing Chad into marriage and forcing people to marry to break their chastity, while making women dependent on men: patriarchy.
Your only way that your idealism for the USSR disappear is just reading the proper marxists and how the USSR really worked:
No it doesn't. My parents grew up in the soviet union and things were a lot different than you westernoids think. All of youse romanticize that part of history way too much
Right, it's always just about control. Keep in mind the elites lived nicely in private domiciles. Clearly not as equal as everybody else.I used to think that Marxists wanted to equalize all people, to protect the weak, so that no one would hurt anyone. But after talking to Marxists, not Western but post-Soviet ones, I became convinced that Marxism was not about equality.
It was literally all about the elites having complete control over people. That's still the case now but they learned that there's better ways of doing thatI used to think that Marxists wanted to equalize all people, to protect the weak, so that no one would hurt anyone. But after talking to Marxists, not Western but post-Soviet ones, I became convinced that Marxism was not about equality.
Respectfully disagree.Masculine sexual misery is just like all forms of misery, an opportunity to strive and a potential market for those willing to exploit their fellow human beings.
The degenerate capitalist bloc is the reason a lot of human experience are progressively turned into ressources by some rich maniacs ruling the tertiary economy, leaders of companies organizing capitalism of data and surveillance on a global scale.
For them, human misery is a ressource, and human propensity to strive is only useful if fake solutions to our problems can be monetized under the form of life long leasing. Thus the bubble on housing, debt, coaches for every single random stuff and Tinder+. As long as the solution they provide is unneficient BUT seems like the only good available solution, they win. And they can only win in the absence of a real counter model.
Now, if everything was under controle of a totalitarian state, its goal would be collective achievements and longterm perpetuation. Enforcing laws to actually favor human progress from birth to death is good for the state in competition against other states of the world. That's why responsible states tend to see benefits in good education system, public infrastructure and policies regarding sport and social bonding. A responsible state needs productive happy people making children.
That's what the USSR tried to provide for a certain period of time, and did marvels. Imagine how a regime could turn a primitive feudal society into the second superpower of this world in only 5 decades. This always blows my mind. And yet, the degenerate liberal agenda wants us to believe this isn't the successful way. In fact the USSR only failed because normies were manipulated to believe in the illusory intrinseque value of a null concept : liberty. USSR lost mainly because of soft power and the progressive capitalistic degeneracy of its elite.
And from liberty comes economical liberalism, sexual revolution, free trade, globalism ... All the things that directly or indirectly tend to enforce inceldom over us.
Plus only a USSR like regime could give you a state mandatory GF
The thing is women would be happier under incel totalitarian guidance. They would be free from the illusion of freedom and choice that the capitalistic moguls are selling them. Foids are just the victim of a system fetishizing greedy short term pleasure and endangering long term relationship building. Our soyciety however is self destructing towards its own collapse.Respectfully disagree.
![]()
Opinion | Why Women Had Better Sex Under Socialism (Published 2017)
Yes, there was repression behind the Iron Curtain. But it wasn’t sexual.www.nytimes.com
The thing is women would be happier under incel totalitarian guidance. They would be free from the illusion of freedom and choice that the capitalistic moguls are selling them. Foids are just the victim of a system fetishizing greedy short term pleasure and endangering long term relationship building. Our soyciety however is self destructing towards its own collapse.
A totalitarian communist state would have the power to enforce state mandatory GF, unlike our liberal capitalistic regimes. There was just not enough communism under communism.You think if we had a communist society we wouldn't see foids go for Chads?
I don't think this happened in the USSRA totalitarian communist state would have the power to enforce state mandatory GF, unlike our liberal capitalistic regimes. There was just not enough communism under communism.
Because as one other user said, "communism" as it was tried was just a bastardized version of mob capitalism. There was not enough communism under "communism".I don't think this happened in the USSR
Natural order is only good for fucking yeast. Humans need to think about how to build the most perfect and convenient social order to strive. The capitalistic option is only creating poverty, crisis over crisis, injustice and organized slavery. Inceldom is a direct product of the extension of the market towards the relationship field.Infact it's against natural order.
That's bs western propaganda.JFL. In the USSR I'd just be sent to a gulag or ''Kill myself'' with 3 bullet wounds on the head
You mean you copeIm mgtow cel, I stay away from women
It means i stay away from womenYou mean you cope
GAYIt means i stay away from women
Not by choiceIt means i stay away from women
He‘s just coping, not gay
Words of wisdom tbhCapitalism has killed more people than every 5 years than communism has killed in 74
At this point you are annoying and need to be silencedNot by choice![]()
GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY FUCKING POST YOU FUGING COCKSUCKER CUUUCK REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAt this point you are annoying and need to be silenced
GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY FUCKING POST YOU FUGING COCKSUCKER CUUUCK REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
![]()
Slave rebellion now !!! Where to sign !!@Fancy Alcoholic DM me for a slave rebellion
AgreeMasculine sexual misery is just like all forms of misery, an opportunity to strive and a potential market for those willing to exploit their fellow human beings.
The degenerate capitalist bloc is the reason a lot of human experience are progressively turned into ressources by some rich maniacs ruling the tertiary economy, leaders of companies organizing capitalism of data and surveillance on a global scale.
For them, human misery is a ressource, and human propensity to strive is only useful if fake solutions to our problems can be monetized under the form of life long leasing. Thus the bubble on housing, debt, coaches for every single random stuff and Tinder+. As long as the solution they provide is unneficient BUT seems like the only good available solution, they win. And they can only win in the absence of a real counter model.
Now, if everything was under controle of a totalitarian state, its goal would be collective achievements and longterm perpetuation. Enforcing laws to actually favor human progress from birth to death is good for the state in competition against other states of the world. That's why responsible states tend to see benefits in good education system, public infrastructure and policies regarding sport and social bonding. A responsible state needs productive happy people making children.
That's what the USSR tried to provide for a certain period of time, and did marvels. Imagine how a regime could turn a primitive feudal society into the second superpower of this world in only 5 decades. This always blows my mind. And yet, the degenerate liberal agenda wants us to believe this isn't the successful way. In fact the USSR only failed because normies were manipulated to believe in the illusory intrinseque value of a null concept : liberty. USSR lost mainly because of soft power and the progressive capitalistic degeneracy of its elite.
And from liberty comes economical liberalism, sexual revolution, free trade, globalism ... All the things that directly or indirectly tend to enforce inceldom over us.
Plus only a USSR like regime could give you a state mandatory GF





