D
Deleted member 20207
–
-
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2019
- Posts
- 2,222
A female who only chooses to only have sex with and reproduce with Chads, takes what is given to her. I do not blame her for that. Everyone wants to live as satisfying lives as possible and reproduce with most attractive specimen of the opposite sex as possible. Doing so, if you have the ability, is only healthy and natural.
There is no reason to date your looksmatch when you do not have to. You certainly would choose Stacy over your looksmatch yourself, if you were able. You certainly would take one million dollar if they were given to you for free, despite that there are people starving, because they do not matter to you.
Yes, it is selfish, but selfishness is natural. I have no problem with people being, selfish, because I am selfish myself. Otherwise I would be a hypocrite.
This does not mean that I am defending female hypergamy. I am against it – not for moral reasons though, but rather for Darwinian reasons. Females are inherently weaker than men and thus have no real power. Females only have abusive power over men by proxy, because male cucks are giving power to females.
If men stopped being cucks, we could easily enslave the female sex though. We could then implement our own hypergamy and eugenics, including cloning Stacies, breeding females to be as sexy as possible for our own pleasure and aborting male fetuses so that we would have more females for ourselves.
It would be righteous, because we are stronger. Objective morality does not exist. Every moral system is inherently subjective and thus corrputing and manipulative, and debating morals is therefore a pointless waste of time. The only thing that really matters in nature, is might. Might makes right.
We, as men, should therefore use our might to remove female rights.
There is no reason to date your looksmatch when you do not have to. You certainly would choose Stacy over your looksmatch yourself, if you were able. You certainly would take one million dollar if they were given to you for free, despite that there are people starving, because they do not matter to you.
Yes, it is selfish, but selfishness is natural. I have no problem with people being, selfish, because I am selfish myself. Otherwise I would be a hypocrite.
This does not mean that I am defending female hypergamy. I am against it – not for moral reasons though, but rather for Darwinian reasons. Females are inherently weaker than men and thus have no real power. Females only have abusive power over men by proxy, because male cucks are giving power to females.
If men stopped being cucks, we could easily enslave the female sex though. We could then implement our own hypergamy and eugenics, including cloning Stacies, breeding females to be as sexy as possible for our own pleasure and aborting male fetuses so that we would have more females for ourselves.
It would be righteous, because we are stronger. Objective morality does not exist. Every moral system is inherently subjective and thus corrputing and manipulative, and debating morals is therefore a pointless waste of time. The only thing that really matters in nature, is might. Might makes right.
We, as men, should therefore use our might to remove female rights.