Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

There is not blackpill.

Infilthtraitor


you can call me Infilthtraitor if you are not in disposition to accept the possibility that biology is not the cause of the Black Pill but the Mass Media. The Incel theory is amazingly accurate but needs an important correction. I want to reform the ovearll theory from a biologist approach to a social historical approach. Incels are wrong to blame the DNA or the Natural Selection when the case is that sexual rejection is caused by a massive brainwash permormed on women by the Mass Media. Got it? Even what you call an "Incel· could be attractive if you make enough propaganda and marketing to present it as attractive. We need to take control over the mass media and stop blaming evolution.
 
Last edited:
The requirement to be considered an incel is believing that Biology is the cause of sexual rejection therefore I am definitely not an incel, the empirical evidence contradicts that belief. Is not it a requirement? I have a deep and strong irreconcilable difference of opinions here with Incels. The general Incel theory is brilliant and absolutely true, yes it is true; 80% of women in urban zones are being reluctant to 80% of men due to their appereance. No doubt. PUA coaching is a big scam and it is not the solution, definitely true. But Stop blaming evolution, genes and DNA, the real cause of the problem is the propaganda and the mass media that have barinwashed women with artificial standards of masculine beauty specially since the 1990's. It is a historical problem created by capitalism with historical causes that provides a way for a historical change. Incels seem to have the common idea that this problem has no possible solution, therefore I have to display a big diffrence of opinions here; we want to present a way out, take the power upon the mass media and the problem will be solved; we need to make a revolution and torn down the mass media icons of masculine beauty, even a civil war will be needed; but it requieres to renounce to the biological approach called call blackpill. I accept everything from the Incel theory but I will never accept the Blackpill theory, it is biased, bullshit, natural selection is not the cause of this conflict. Cientificism and biolicism are not the correct approach to this matters. The problem is 100% cultural. Carl Marx is more appropiate to understand the problem tthan Darwin. So I cannot call myself Incel because believing in Blackpill is law here. Let's call my way the revolutionary pill.
 
Last edited:
Woah

Nice try editing my comment framing me, Shows you are really rotten to the core
 
Exactly, if the requirement to be considered an incel is believing that Biology is the cause of sexual rejection therefore I am definitely not an incel, Is it?
 
View attachment 934383
Nice try editing my comment framing me, Shows you are really rotten to the core
My fault I have corrected it now, Do not use it ad hominem to deviate the focus of the debate, now, let me ask you this, do you believe that the cause of sexual rejection is due to biological reasons as the Black Pill hypothesis states or is it caused by non biological related reasons as I state based on historical evidence. Do you think that being an Incel requieres believing in the first statement or not.
 
The black pill tells a thousand real facts, and I respect that, but it commits a BIG, BIG, HUGE unforgivable mistake.
1) It is true that many men are now being segregated by their biotype.
segregated by such things as jaw and chin type, height, and facial features. YES. It's true. (From now on we will call this: discrimination by biotype). But the black pill theory, (from now on called the biotypes theory), states that it happens due to BIOLOGICAL CAUSES. Women involuntarily seek some particular physical types by virtue of unavoidable biological and evolutionary reasons. Those who do not match that biotype are dead for sexual life. it would be better fot them to commit suicide because Nature has condemned them. It is their biological doom.
2) That is a BIG mistake, for not to say a lie. There are endless anthropological reserches that demonstrate that in every different culture throughout human history, women have preferred very different masculine biotypes contrary to the current canon that we have today, which some you Incels call «The Chad», and which is promoted by western media.
(I do not call it chad but the PMB , that is, the paradigm of current male beauty, PMB).
This paradigm has been promoted by DC Comics and the entertainment industry. The male with strong jaw and angular chin, squared face, ears in a straight line, height greater than a meter seventy five centimeters, etc. In several and different nations, women, led by different cultures have preferred small men, with short jaws, with round faces, with protruding ears, men with big teeth, etc. Otherwise humanity would not have biological variety and all males since the beginning of history would have been a boring copy of Clark Kent or The Rock. Like the elite described in the book «Brave New World».

3) The result would be the death of the species due to lack of genetic variety. The fact is this: crowded teeth, round faces, and short heights add genetic variety. It is biased to believe in the black pill. Natural Selection is not the cause of the problem.
The real reason of the current masculine beauty prototype is our culture. The culture created it in the USA and California since the 80s. It's the media and the entertainment industry that made that selection.
4) The indu-porn is the main problem.
5) In short, it is true, there is a sexual apartheid that discriminates millions of men. They are going to be left alone without inimacy because of their physical appearance or biotype. YES. We do not deny it.
But it is a big mistake to state dogmatically that this hideous discrimination is caused by any biological cause.
With all due respect, that is WRONG.

6) If tomorrow Western civilization ends by a nuclear war and India becomes the only society left standing, the "model of male beauty" will be an Indian male prototype, with crowded teeth, less than six feet, and dark skin. That will be the new "chad".

7) So do something ABOUT THIS, mobilize, denounce and fight back the culture that is nullifying you.
ONE WAY OR ANOTHER the hemegony of what you call the chad has expiration date. Just fight back.
This is not unavoidable. Throw away the black pill, it is scientist, it lacks anthropological and ethnographic knowledge.
I respect your insights, your incel theory will change the sociology of the next decades, you are telling the true, but you are wrong about the real cause of the problem, I must let you know your mistake.

With all due respect,

Thanks a lot.

Please look at the "chad" of the Zoe nation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5oxWayvyYI
I'd argue the reason behind genetic variety is simply because women back then had little option when it came to choosing their partner, They couldnt work and make money themselves therefore had to rely on a man to provide for them, Thats how its always been. Until the liberation of women recently. Where now they can work and be more Independent giving them the option to focus more on the biological factors of the man rather than the financial factor. That explains why women in the most liberated countries dont have much of the terrible features of round face, Short height, crowded teeth. And the countries which arent as liberated they tend to have an uglier population with the features i just mentioned. And i dont think women in different cultures really prefer/ed these features. More like they had little to no choice when it came to that matter. I must admit. The PMB part makes a lot of sense. Even now we see a change in women preference a lot seem to enjoy the prettyboy look which is very popular among young women. Which digs the question. Who controls these preferences? The prettyboy phenotype didnt come from the entertainment industry or DC comics. It was simply a bunch of guys showing their looks and it got popular only because women liked it. I dont think men have any say on these preferences.
 
I'd argue the reason behind genetic variety is simply because women back then had little option when it came to choosing their partner, They couldnt work and make money themselves therefore had to rely on a man to provide for them, Thats how its always been. Until the liberation of women recently. Where now they can work and be more Independent giving them the option to focus more on the biological factors of the man rather than the financial factor. That explains why women in the most liberated countries dont have much of the terrible features of round face, Short height, crowded teeth. And the countries which arent as liberated they tend to have an uglier population with the features i just mentioned. And i dont think women in different cultures really prefer/ed these features. More like they had little to no choice when it came to that matter. I must admit. The PMB part makes a lot of sense. Even now we see a change in women preference a lot seem to enjoy the prettyboy look which is very popular among young women. Which digs the question. Who controls these preferences? The prettyboy phenotype didnt come from the entertainment industry or DC comics. It was simply a bunch of guys showing their looks and it got popular only because women liked it. I dont think men have any say on these preferences.
 
In several and different nations, women, led by different cultures have preferred small men, with short jaws, with round faces, with protruding ears, men with big teeth, etc.
Yes. And these same women are getting chadfished every day by fellow incels with the same Chads.

the Zoe foids don't fuck Dolph Lundgren lookalikes because those are not available. If they join Tinder, their preferences would be the same as other foids'

Just like all males enjoy the feeling of warm pussy bouncing on their dick while a nice pair of round boobs bounce in front of our eyes because we were biologically wired to enjoy it; likewise Females all desire a similar archetype of the ideal male. These achetypical preferences are the DEFINITION of a species.

The species "zebra" exists because each zebra prefers fucking other sexy zebras. They all are born with an archetype of "sexy zebra" imprinted in their brain. That's why you don't see zebras trying to fuck giraffes... a giraffe is not sexy to a zebra, likewise a pajeet manlet is farther from the ideal human archetype than Chad is.

The Asians have their round yellow faces and chinky eyes with short jaws because the Mongols invented the composite bow before everyone else, and then killed all men and fucked all foids they could reach reach.

There is no blackpill but The Blackpill
and Hamudi is its prophet.
 
Last edited:
No he leído ni la mitad de lo que has escrito, comepalomas.
 
It is not your blame brother, my English sucks.
As a matter of fact all English in general sucks. It is a really poor impersonal language. Very primitive. Is there any possible way to have a forum in Spanish? does anyone speak Spanish here ? is it allowed?
Chúpame la polla. ¿Cuánto medirás en realidad? Estarás a la par que el peruano promedio, presuponiendo que lo seas realmente.

No, esto no es nada personal.
 
I agree for the most part with this. Very well put , can't add anything further.
 

Similar threads

Logic55
Replies
25
Views
982
Plggy20144
Plggy20144
Logic55
Replies
2
Views
295
Vilsonicvs
Vilsonicvs
drainercel
Replies
5
Views
216
Darth Aries
Darth Aries

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top